yallallcrazy
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 836 |
| Registered on: | 10/16/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: How is the drainage at Tamahka Trails?
Posted by yallallcrazy on 5/20/26 at 10:29 am to Gings5
4ball match play.
re: How is the drainage at Tamahka Trails?
Posted by yallallcrazy on 5/19/26 at 7:55 pm to JoeNelson
Hope the weather holds out. That’s such a great tournament with a really cool format. Sadly, couldn’t play this year.
re: Why does my lob wedge hate me ?
Posted by yallallcrazy on 5/13/26 at 12:13 pm to SenGooner
quote:
What's your most common miss? Once you figure that out, you can figure out a setup that focuses on elimination of that miss.
My personal issue is that I have about an equal distribution of two different misses. On a 35 yd shot, I am equally likely to hit 160 yards screaming blade shot, or a chunk that rolls
Neither one of them happens all that often, but it’s just enough that it stays in your head all the time
re: Srixon ZXI5 irons. Anyone playing them?
Posted by yallallcrazy on 5/11/26 at 5:03 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Great irons. Work well for a wide variety of handicaps. they have enough launch help that most handicap levels can use them. Pretty long as well but without those hotspots some irons can have, and they are consistent enough in distance and controllable enough that I know quite a few low single digit players who use them
To me, they are as close to a “cannot go too wrong” set as you can get. For any given person, they may not be the absolutely most optimal, but they would probably be reasonable
To me, they are as close to a “cannot go too wrong” set as you can get. For any given person, they may not be the absolutely most optimal, but they would probably be reasonable
re: Coeur d'Alene resort golf course
Posted by yallallcrazy on 4/29/26 at 12:54 pm to Ttiger37
Last year. Very enjoyable. Was last weekend of season so had a frost delay to start the day and I was concerned it would be a looong round. Nope. Forecaddies kept everyone moving at a comfortable but reasonable pace.
Well manicured, great views, deer and turkey everywhere, memorable island green hole with the boat ride. Plays longer than expected.
I also drove a little ways and played Circling Raven, which is very different but was also nice
Well manicured, great views, deer and turkey everywhere, memorable island green hole with the boat ride. Plays longer than expected.
I also drove a little ways and played Circling Raven, which is very different but was also nice
re: Cabo Golf
Posted by yallallcrazy on 3/27/26 at 7:16 pm to TheSHU
Played Solmar. Don’t have to stay in any certain property to get on.
Was really enjoyable.
Was really enjoyable.
re: Big lake red trip 1/2026
Posted by yallallcrazy on 1/31/26 at 11:58 am to KemoSabe65
[url=LINK ]
[/url]
[/url]re: Big lake red trip 1/2026
Posted by yallallcrazy on 1/30/26 at 8:38 pm to AlxTgr
lol
I noticed that as well. I figured it would be worthy of a comment.
I noticed that as well. I figured it would be worthy of a comment.
re: Big lake red trip 1/2026
Posted by yallallcrazy on 1/30/26 at 8:26 pm to AlxTgr
Just polished off a plate of salsa simmered redfish with smashed potatoes. Yesterday it was half shells.
The awesomeness of that trip and the aftermath cannot be overstated…!
The awesomeness of that trip and the aftermath cannot be overstated…!
re: Electronic Ear Protection
Posted by yallallcrazy on 1/26/26 at 5:42 pm to LSUDUCKMAN67
There are any number of custom options you can get from hearing aid places.
Cheaper, non - custom fitted options with decent sound quality and good protection:
Otto noise barriers
Peltor eep 100 (or TEP200 but more $$)
Axil
I’ve used Otto and Axil. Like Otto better but they are more expensive.
Cheaper, non - custom fitted options with decent sound quality and good protection:
Otto noise barriers
Peltor eep 100 (or TEP200 but more $$)
Axil
I’ve used Otto and Axil. Like Otto better but they are more expensive.
re: LiveScope is something else!
Posted by yallallcrazy on 11/4/25 at 2:05 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
3:1 arse whipping
It’s usually more like 30:1
re: John Carmouche: "the taxpayer has never paid for a coach and never will"
Posted by yallallcrazy on 10/31/25 at 5:11 pm to dstone12
quote:
Landry is technically correct but not practically so. Then practically take the taxpayer burden out of the technical contract. Replyreplies3... up vote5
Here’s the one I replied to. There are several others where you say ‘ it’s in ink’ etc
My point is, it doesn’t say the words ‘ the taxpayers are responsible’ so that cannot be taken out.
It’s just that if you ask an attorney who is responsible for the buyout and then you go down the entire cascade you eventually arrive at the taxpayer because LSU is a state entity.
LSU is the responsible party. LSU has many sources of funding but in the end, in a total Armageddon, the final rung in the ladder is the state, i.e. the taxpayers.
But, here’s the kicker. We are discussing buyout.
In the scenario that this would reach that far down the ladder of responsibility— just don’t fire the guy!!
Then there’s no buyout. And if the boosters don’t pay, the athletic department has gone insolvent, the university has gone insolvent, and the state has gone insolvent — losing football games won’t be the biggest issue.
re: John Carmouche: "the taxpayer has never paid for a coach and never will"
Posted by yallallcrazy on 10/31/25 at 12:48 pm to dstone12
quote:
the taxpayer is on the contract
How would you propose to remove the taxpayer from the contract, as mentioned in your previous post?
It’s not like it’s directly stated in there that the taxpayer is responsible. LSU is responsible, because LSU is hiring the coach to work for LSU. The only way to get “the taxpayer” out of the contract is to not have LSU named.
I’m genuinely curious what people want to see in a contract to alleviate this “problem”?
re: John Carmouche: "the taxpayer has never paid for a coach and never will"
Posted by yallallcrazy on 10/31/25 at 11:30 am to dstone12
The contract between a coach and a university is, and always will be, between the coach and the university.
That makes the university ultimately responsible
If it is a state university, that makes the taxpayers ultimately responsible
This is every coaching contract, and every university employee contract, and is not alterable unless you want to have a major booster hire the Coach directly as a personal employee. It is not alterable because the coach WORKS FOR THE UNIVERSITY.
However, university leaders will go out into the community and solicit donations to cover the cost of the Coach or the cost of the buyout.
If donors are unwilling to donate said funds, the coach will simply not be hired or fired. And to be honest, if donors are not willing to pony up the money for the hire buyout, maybe there is not enough consensus that the coach should be hired/fired in any event.
So, therefore, the taxpayer is “technically” responsible ( just like they are responsible for every other employee of any state university), but there is not a reasonable scenario where they would ever actually have to come up with the money.
That makes the university ultimately responsible
If it is a state university, that makes the taxpayers ultimately responsible
This is every coaching contract, and every university employee contract, and is not alterable unless you want to have a major booster hire the Coach directly as a personal employee. It is not alterable because the coach WORKS FOR THE UNIVERSITY.
However, university leaders will go out into the community and solicit donations to cover the cost of the Coach or the cost of the buyout.
If donors are unwilling to donate said funds, the coach will simply not be hired or fired. And to be honest, if donors are not willing to pony up the money for the hire buyout, maybe there is not enough consensus that the coach should be hired/fired in any event.
So, therefore, the taxpayer is “technically” responsible ( just like they are responsible for every other employee of any state university), but there is not a reasonable scenario where they would ever actually have to come up with the money.
re: Billy Napier's records at ULL
Posted by yallallcrazy on 10/28/25 at 9:50 am to Contra
You have to look at more than just the record. Lots of guys end up with a three or four year run because they happened onto some special players. Curley Hallman is a very extreme example of this, but there are many others.
The thing about a Sumrall is that he did it at 2 schools. I’m not saying he’s the guy we need to get, just saying that that is a relevant data point
The thing about a Sumrall is that he did it at 2 schools. I’m not saying he’s the guy we need to get, just saying that that is a relevant data point
re: Ear protection for hunting suggestions
Posted by yallallcrazy on 8/12/25 at 9:44 pm to jpggpj
Otto noise barriers.
Have the Axil. Like these better. Little more, but not up in the custom fit range. Can use many different types of comm tips.
Have the Axil. Like these better. Little more, but not up in the custom fit range. Can use many different types of comm tips.
re: Why do people just assume Tiger is the Goat?
Posted by yallallcrazy on 6/15/25 at 6:27 pm to Tyga Woods
Jack: 18 majors and 19 seconds. Of the Forty majors played in the 1970s he finished in the top 10 in 35 of them ( heard this today on PGA Tour radio and have not confirmed). 73 top 10s
Tiger : 15 majors and 6 second places. 40 top 10s.
The way I always think about it is that Jack has the greatest record of all time, Tiger was the most dominant for an extended period of time that has ever been.
Not sure which one of those that makes the GOAT. Do you prioritize the record over decades, or the level of dominance over like one decade? Either way, no one else is in the same category as those two.
Tiger : 15 majors and 6 second places. 40 top 10s.
The way I always think about it is that Jack has the greatest record of all time, Tiger was the most dominant for an extended period of time that has ever been.
Not sure which one of those that makes the GOAT. Do you prioritize the record over decades, or the level of dominance over like one decade? Either way, no one else is in the same category as those two.
re: Whats rorys deal with the media at majors?
Posted by yallallcrazy on 6/13/25 at 3:49 pm to prostyleoffensetime
quote:
Yeah, he should have named names, but also should have chastised the media to their faces over it instead of running from them. Basically been like it was these shite heads that leaked it and they should be dealt with, but you as the media are being disingenuous for blowing this out of proportion. Being however many whatever measurement out of conformity results in a very negligible result. Here's a TaylorMade rep to explain it for you clowns. If you already knew this, and still reported it, this is why nobody likes your profession. If you didn't know this and reported it, why are you even allowed in this room?
Hell yes!!
I do not know why more athletes/politician/public figures do not do this. It would be fantastically entertaining and would also stop all the half-truth BS clickbait crap that goes on.
re: Speaking of balls, that Titleist ad with "Won't Get Fooled Again"...
Posted by yallallcrazy on 6/3/25 at 7:37 pm to bopper50
I remember the first time I hit one. I had found it on the course. Prior to that I was constantly debating and going back-and-forth between wound balls for spin and things like precept that flew so nicely.
I have found this one on the course, dropped it on the fairway and hit a six iron to the green. It flew like the solid balls. Next hole I had a little pitch shot that spun like a bottle. It was like a magic potion.
I have found this one on the course, dropped it on the fairway and hit a six iron to the green. It flew like the solid balls. Next hole I had a little pitch shot that spun like a bottle. It was like a magic potion.
re: Name some extinct Louisiana golf courses
Posted by yallallcrazy on 5/29/25 at 1:48 pm to BlastOff
quote:
Bayou Barriere GC in Belle Chasse
27 holes. We used to play there while the Belle Chase Air Show was going on. The planes would make turns over the course and hit the gas to get back into formation over the airbase. Was always a unique day on the course!
re: Ball in divot revisit…
Posted by yallallcrazy on 5/26/25 at 6:09 pm to CBandits82
quote:
you can’t fully define a divot.
You cannot. Divots go through a progression and at some undefinable point they are not divots anymore. Nearly every spot in any fairway that isn’t perfect is likely a spot that’s been hit off of before, even if a week ago.
And the idea that a lie in the fairway is supposed to be perfect isn’t really accurate either. Your odds are certainly better, but it isn’t guaranteed just like a bad lie in the rough isn’t guaranteed. That’s golf. Hit it, find it, hit it again. The one who can do that the best and deal with what comes up wins.
Popular
0











