BarCo49

Ahhhh... It must be depressing to be you. One generation removed from New Jersey.

Casting pearls before swine. Much wisdom in your assessment. If they didn't have that vitamin P - we'd hunt them with dogs.

Looks like that one and 2 more just like it. Damn!

That deserves another rendition of the New Iberia Haircut song...

Statistics.

I was a Charlie Kirk fan. I was saying the shite-show on justifying this killing is just beginning. I am nauseated about this. I don't know how to make that more clear. The guy was a martyr in my opinion. I don't know what else to tell you.

Just get ready....you will be amazed I'm quite sure.

That +/- (more or less) is there for a reason. A survey is generally regarded as the gold standard. An attorney's interpretation of the legal description or an old survey usually does not trump a recent/current survey. I sell land for a living - I've had more surveyors find errors in the chain of title than I've had lawyers find them. I think the only legal challenge to a current survey that would prevail would be an "open, hostile, and notorious" challenge, also known as adverse possession - that is the legal term for an accepted boundary line such as an access road or fence that has been unchallenged 20 years or more.

If you got what you wanted for the 51+/- acres - I would not care if it turned out to be a few acres more. I don't understand why the buyer's attorney would refute the 54 acre claim and revise it back to 51 acres in the face of a recent 54 acre survey unless they think the additional 3 acres might cause you to back out. If there is no contingency for the property being a minimum of 51 acres or based on a price per surveyed acre - then you have a contract to sell based on 51 acres, more or less. If you have a price per surveyed acre contingency in your contract, then the buyer's attorney is trying to keep his client from paying for an extra 3 acres.

ETA - "perhaps, allegedly, maybe"...I'm not an attorney and I'm not giving legal advice. Just sharing my experiences. :lol:

Looking at a Benelli M2 or a Beretta A400 shotgun. 20 gauge, 28 inch barrel, synthetic - black gun is fine - camo not a a must have. I do understand the inertia vs gas proposition here - I have both operating systems in other guns.

I'd appreciate some advice vetted through use of either of these models. Just gonna be a dove gun - dropping down to 20 gauge for recoil and weight purposes. I shoot a lot of dove in SE Alabama - I'm getting to an age where I don't like running 2-3 boxes of shells through a 12 gauge.

I'm having a hard time understanding the price differential aside from the A400 making it's recent comeback outside the Xplor model, which I do not want.

I did a 12X90 for $6,500 just over a year ago. Concrete was $188 per yard. That sounds high as GP.