omegaman66

quote:

---

You think we're going to have full and total control of 90+ million radical Islamic hostiles in 10-20 days?

---

This statement shows you do not know what you are talking about. And the number of upvotes shows that you are not alone.

You appear to be under the assumption that there are 90 million people we will need to fight or suppress. In reality the number you posted is basically much closer to the number of civilian in Iran that want to fight the IRGC and topple this regime. You have it backwards.

US forces are not going to invade and take Iran. The Iranian people are going to do that, with a little bit of help once the air campaign is over.

quote:

---

Yea I’m wrong. I now realize you tards think Iran is plotting a submarine campaign against us. I’m out.

---

Why do, I mean, why DID they have a sub?

Nobody said they were planning a sub attack. We were talking about capability.

How do you know they were not planning to use a weapon of war against the USA?

quote:

---

He's a satanist

Bleeding heart Liberal. Prince Philip couldn't stand him. Apparently neither could Diana

---

Satanist. This isn't even something new. Satanist and it isn't exaggeration. That is why they killed Princess Diana. She wasn't one of them and she wasn't converted.

quote:

---

Lets examine the matter further. It is factually true that Iran did not in January 2026 and has never possessed missile technology capable of striking the United States (i.e. ICBMs). You can look it up and you will find this statement is true.

---

Why did you change your argument from the ability to to strike the USA to the ability to strike with ICBMs?

You realize that a submarine has the ability to move right. You realize when that Americans were killed in Israel during the Oct. 7th attack right?

I sure hope so. Maybe the next one will not be so kind to the DS.

quote:

---

Iran has largely acted rationally though.

---

Exactly... bombing you own allies is not irrational despite what common sense tells us.

quote:

---

Axios has been well sourced throughout this conflict. Barak Ravid and Marc Caputo have a direct line to the administration. Sorry if that ruins your safe space.

---

So you think "well sourced" means that they can't spin and lie about stuff. There isn't a single person on this planet that doesn't have an agenda/narrative that they want pushed.

quote:

---

BREAKING: Nonstop heavy airstrikes are pounding Iran’s southern coastline, with multiple targets hit in and around Bandar Abbas, a key strategic port near the Strait of Hormuz.

---

Could this be the answer as to where the MEU is headed?

quote:

---

“If you saw what I saw, you would know UFO’s are REAL”

---

Oh yeah, well I haven't see what you have seen an neither have you.

Species from another planet have zero chance of breeding with humans are any other animal on this planet and having viable offspring. Sort of part of the definition of what a species is.

IF they can have sex and produce offspring with us then they originated here or we originated there.

quote:

---

President Trump: U.S. operations have set Iran back 15–20 years, claiming destruction of its military, telecoms, and leadership. “It doesn’t matter whether they come or not… they have no navy, no air force, no anti-aircraft systems. Their leaders are all gone. That’s why we have regime change.”

---

Yeah that might be true but the dims or the UK or China or NK, or Russia will sell them one.

Regime change is the only answer. The ONLY answer. It really is very simple. If a regime hates you the only way to prevent them from hurting you is to kill them. Nothing else works. This regime needs to die. It is not as if a nuke is the only means an enemy has to hurt you.

quote:

---

I agree NATO should be doing more, but to say "NATO isn't helping us at all" is just flatly false. In fact, we wouldn't have been able to conduct our air campaign with anything like its current sortie level without using NATO bases. That's just a fact.

---

I don't count getting out of our way as actually helping.