Dandy Chiggins

I *think* he's saying:

1. China should open up their market to US products
2. It would be good for them
3. Closed markets don't work

Immigrants for the; but not for me…..

To me; flying is the best part of that sport.
They should fly.

quote:

---

That's great. I would recommend using more language like that.

---

So the recommendation is to use "more" of the language I've already been using? Got it.

quote:

---

I'm simply asking you to not post made up things as if they are fact.

---

Use "in front of house" instead of "driveway", which I already admitted was a mistake. Got it.

quote:

---

I'm not taking it too seriously. I'm simply asking you to not post made up things as if they are fact. I don't understand why you think that's a crazy request

---

I'm certainly not going to fact check my memory against the trial transcripts before posting to a tigerdroppings thread; so again, feel free to skip over my posts. Or continue to have a weird boner for fact checking me.
Once again, I'm no expert and have freely admitted if I've made an error and; continually add qualifiers to my posts as noted above. Hope your day gets better man.

quote:

---

You keep posting a lot of things as factual statements that aren't actually true.

---

And admit others follow it closely and admit if someone clarifies it for me.
I’m not a juror. I’m casually discussing a trial I’m interested in on a message board.
Feel free to skip over my posts.

1 other thing for me, that is certainly open to interpretation:
Her crazy calls to him that morning definitely sounded real, emotional, and genuine.

She honestly came across as a (somewhat psycho) girlfriend who believed he was shacked up somewhere. Not someone who was calling to cover tracks.....

I think it was the prosecution who played those tapes, (Maybe defense?). But if anything for me they prosecution story MORE believable.

(I dont believe she hit him; BUT even if she did, she appeared to not know it)

I'm guessing it was the defense.?
Based on memory; didn't the defense expert say the iOS version the prosecution tested was the wrong one?

You seem to know it pretty well; thoughts on this…..
Another thing that bothered me is the sheer logistics. The defense never made a point out of it that I saw; but the logistics don’t make any sense:

1. KR was in the driveway. Both sides testified to that. Yet JOK was found at the complete other side of the yard.

Did he walk to the other side of the yard for no reason whatsoever; why would he be near the street at all? then….

2. KR, drunk as a skunk, backs out of the driveway and gets up to 25 mph in reverse and hits him. JOK is standing there watching and just lets her get up to 24 mph and drill him?

3. Assuming he stood still……
Driving a car sober at 10 mph in reverse isn’t normal. 25 mph in reverse is difficult; while drunk and hitting a target seems like it would be a pretty hard.

The bite wounds had pork DNA.
Defense theory is that many dog treats and chew toys contain pork.

So I think it does go to reasonable doubt in that the most likely thing to cause a bite type wound is a dog not a taillight.
The most likely way for pork to get into a bite type would is probably from dna remaining on the dogs teeth.certainly not from a car.

Etc etc etc….

His dad is the Equalizer?