jackamo3300

So does anyone lend any more credence to opinions from Sununu regarding Trump than they would from other similar type Repubs like Christie, Wolfewitz, Kristol, Romney, George Bush, George Will, Sexton, Lowery (from the National Review), Erickson, Coulter, Barr...

You Republicans surely have a dubious Rogues Gallery in your own Party to have to deal with. How much more internal undermining can your Party take.

quote:

quote:

---

No one has been able to prove that it’s happening at all. Unless you’re claiming one sentence about a survey on racial biases is indoctrination, In which case I need you to explain how that sentence is indoctrination.

There is proof but you don’t believe it if you’re not in the classroom yourself.

Or you’re just a liar.

---

This tactic of challenging whether some things are true just because they themselves haven't seen it is something very nearly exclusive to the left.

Sometimes it takes years before the truth comes out because people who actually experienced it are finally willing to talk.

Just saw one of the absolute worst examples of weak parentage - if not the worst.

Through the miracles of multi-culturalism, some transplanted east Indians into various communities in this country in the '80s and 90s somehow were able to convince some "progressive" parents to send their kids to India to be under the tutelage of Guru Yogi Bhajan and his 3HO cult, to be students in any of his many ashrams learning predominantly yoga and meditation in lieu of math and reading.

Nearly impossible to believe that some parents actually did this to their kids.

What wasn't publicly known nor revealed was that the girls were being groomed to ultimately serve all his instinctual compulsions.

Yet he covered himself by having summer camps for the students where they were supposed to be taught the way to be pure of mind.

Even while he was claiming celibacy for himself.

The parents who put their children in this impossible situation were/are the weakest of the weak. And they're still out there.

Most if not all of these Occidental American kids were given East Indian names.

Some who were allowed years later to return home to visit their parents didn't even recognize them.

Now that they are well into their adulthood some are beginning to speak and tell the world what went on in the 3H0 cult.

One of them spoke of how she had been sent by her own parents to this freak in India to be under his complete control.

She spoke of how it is to be confused and have no one to turn to. To be completely helpless in the face of forces that had total control over her.

No parents to hold her and assure her that she was loved, protected, and safe.

The point is that these things are generally made possible by "progressives." They are weak and can be influenced to take part in any deviancy as long they're told that it is the latest in progressive social theory.

Now the kicker. When the dissolute deviant Bhajan finally died from heart problems and diabetes from a life of indulgence and license, our own Coelenterates in Congress called him, "the essence of spirituality."

Some of those who fell for his line, all these years later admit to being gullible, weak, and manipulable.

Yet, after all they suffered under Bhajan a few still steadfastly, stubbornly believe in the 3HO cult and want it to continue. Some people can't be helped.

All Hail multiculturalism. For another New Year of it.

quote:

---

I think its already happened.

---

Brought here around 1935 thanks to the naivete of the times, and has been festering and embedding itself deeper into every institution since - just like any malignancy.

Now the ideological deviants they've kept producing for about three generations are in their next phase and getting their second wind.

Lots of enthusiasm and smugness among them.

Deviancy never corrects itself. It wallows in itself.

Some of those East Indians sure seem to be "racist."

But this question appears periodically. Presently, the only thing that means anything is how it's being presented in the propaganda mills.

Slavery was the ancillary wedge used to coax the South into "doing something" which they ultimately did, but also as a military assist.

In tandem with the harassing tariffs placed on commodities shipped to the north ostensibly, solely via the Atlantic coast.

What wasn't told the South is that they would be used on commodities being shipped across to the mills in Europe, which was the real purpose for them from the start.

Which would allow North authoritarians to board the Southern ships and fine, and even seize the cargoes conveniently were it decided upon.

The North was not about to allow the South to become both an agrarian and an industrial giant.

They knew all the potential was down here for it, with just the accommodating weather giving us longer periods for production.

But an ambience that all around is superior to the North.

So if there were no blacks and no slavery, skirmishes would've been inevitable.

There have been wars fought for far less.

The Dutch even fought a war over spices.

The above reasons were more than intimated by T. Harry Williams whose two-volume book on American history was the texts used for the course across Louisiana's colleges for at least two generations.

Is it still used? Or has it been discreetly replaced because it doesn't give the full modern narrative that's now been decided upon by progressive revisionists.

Plus, victimhood has been big business in this nation, and will continue to be.

And property destruction, mayhem, injury, and death will continue unabated as one of the residuals we've been gifted with because of it all.

Actually was presumptuous enough to believe that something like this would be done in Louisiana with Ardoin.

If not by the Feds, even if it had to be done by a state panel, to invite and coax him into explaining and defending openly and proudly why every RFP he ever wrote for the acquisition of voting machines favored Dominion.

Maybe it didn't happen because Orleans was unable to swing the election here for Biden.

We'll still have more than enough time for it to be done with this new Secretary of State - Nancy Landry - who was on Ardoin's staff and who was recently quoted as believing that everything is just fine with the State's voter rolls.

Nothing as yet from her about Dominion.

More evidence of the gaps in the rationale of the typical voter, Brandon Trosclair, who was the only candidate to go into specifics about addressing the corrupt voter rolls across the state, and how he would make it his first priority came in 4th.

There's nothing "possible" about that type of symptom being evidence of serious psychopathy.

It's one of the major indicators - which can show itself as early as the childhood years - and no, they don't grow out of it.

The post said "hints" of psychopathy - is that enough of a qualifier?

The successful writer Ian Fleming had that dysfunction all the way from childhood.

Writing was part of his regimen to sublimate and channel his sadistic tendencies elsewhere.

The former.

This is a sore spot with us over here who have seen and had to deal with indescribable abuse at the private and professional levels that would sicken all but the worst, most irretrievable psychopath.


"If there were no animals, man would die of a loneliness of the Spirit."

~ Chief Seattle

quote:

---

Brought to you by the bunch that kneeled and cheered the domestic terrorists known as Black Lives Matter.

---

How'd ya like to have types like that living next door to you.

A young couple with a BLM sign on the front of their house. Who blew in here from Oregon (would like to say from Portland), so it's not all that surprising.

More of the types who believe they can buy peace for themselves through pandering, even by compromisng their self respect.

The accusation that leftists pull up and move somewhere else after they've made their digs unlivable, but curiously don't leave behind the skewed view of reality that helped cause the necessity for the move is authentic and unassailable.

We had three attempted home invasions orchestrated together here one Saturday night. The young Oregonians' answer to that was to put their sign up.

It would be hilarious and even entertaining were it not so sad and demeaning.

The new age of the poltroons.

Still it's curious how some grab hold of something like this desperately as though they actually are trying to force themselves to believe that this might be the "start of a new beginning."

That Farrakhan might actually vote for Trump.

"Supporting" should be in quotes.

This couldn't at all be Farrakhan's use of the deceptive dissimulation (Taqqiya and Kitman) which are doctrinal and required of real muslims, whom he might even regard as his "bros."

But then we're still not sure how "submissive" he is to the doctrinal requirements of real muslims.

Just one more excursion into the manifold, multiple assault and attempt to further undermine Trump's already wounded image.

So many variations of "operation chaos" to at least try.

Looking forward to possible sudden announcements of fervent backing for Trump from types like critical theorists Judith Butler and Angela Davis; or how about Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

All as likely as something similar from Dershowitz.

quote:

---

They are. They were all the Rubio/Cruz nevertrumpers

---

Maximum certitude. They're like a neon sign displaying it.

But at least this time their favorite complies with Article II Section 1, clause 5 as goes eligibility for the position.

That is, if there is any credibility at all in the interpretation of The Document by the textualists and originalists.