Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Texas
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:11427
Registered on:4/25/2004
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
Indeed and main character syndrome is right. This baw, Pillow-man, and Candace could cook up some mighty fine CT's together.
quote:

What is Inthematrixxx?


Not a what, a who - a Q baker/influencer from waaay back.

re: This crazy bitch is uncontrollable

Posted by TigerDoc on 12/10/25 at 10:49 am to
I think a recurring problem of political discourse is our civics haven't absorbed a reasonable ethic of discussing conspiracies, so it descends into whataboutism like this. An alternative might be trying to distinguish conspiracies from conspiracy theories from conspiracism (conspiracies happen; conspiracy theories can be right or wrong; conspiracism is a worldview that overuses conspiratorial explanations at the expense of more likely causes of events).
If this baw was right, we'd have >600k additional new cancer cases in the US this year and MD Anderson, Sloan-Kettering or anybody else who actually treats cancer and the advocacy groups for these individual cancers would all be shouting their heads off. This is prop for the "turbo cancer" fan-bros.

quote:

First term Trump was a phenomenal president. Second term Trump is a gigantic sack of shite.


He's mostly the same and most of the difference is he had lots of people checking his worst impulses last time, but he's now surrounded only by enablers.

re: The Labor Theory of Value

Posted by TigerDoc on 12/4/25 at 12:31 pm to
Interesting post. This LTV vs. surplus idea is interesting with respect to discussion culture (e.g. w/politics). Most people including myself don't know lots of economics, but we nevertheless acquire folk understandings that trickle down from trends in formal economic thinking and so we swim in water with relatively few structural accounts (doesn't have to be LTV), creating this space where our at-hand explanations for events tend to be agential (e.g. great man history, conspiracism, etc.), which isn't to say agents aren't highly consequential, but it skews things away from the systemic or random. Of course ironically you can come up with plenty of CT's for that trend. :lol:
He didn't say it - he meant to DM it to Bondi, but accidentally posted it publicly then deleted it when he realized he'd fricked up.

They weren't a myth, but why the idea of liberty became a political force in the enlightenment (e.g. you don't really find it in the medievals) invites explanation.
close and understandable mistake - that was the ghost of the former Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez.
ah, you must've seen Dos Mil Mulas. :lol:
No, I don't disbelieve it, but the reason I believe it is because it was well-vetted information (by the way, SFP is right that viruses do this and covid causes those inflammatory heart conditions more frequently and more severely than the vaccine in addition to many, many conditions the vaccine doesn't cause). This isn't well-vetted info. We can get into what that would look like if you'd like. We could also get into why you should be more rather than less skeptical of these jokers w/r/t health info.

He shouldn't just vaguely gesture at case reports, though, right? He should actually publish the data like was done when the J&J vaccine was pulled from the market for much less than this.
it's cause and effect of distrust. If purebloods had just gotten vaccinated at the time they'd be justifying their decision the other way now just like the rest of us. :lol:
Yeah, he's old and he fears diseases that are dangerous to old people as he should.

He doesn't promote the vaccine anymore, though, because he doesn't want to upset his base who accept its dangerousness as an identity-badge.
It shouldn't be. There are similar dynamics there.
Why do you think Trump gets vaccinated for covid every year?
quote:

If people on social media say the earth is flat, many in the masses will believe it.


It's partially parasocial trust in influencers, but they also appeal to the same CT's that the believer already accepts - if an all-powerful Cabal is concealing that Brigiette Macron's true nature and the Charlie-Kirk assassination conspiracy and whatever else, how much harder to believe they're faking satellite photos and other "so-called evidence" of earth's roundness?
People aren't wrong to be skeptical of pharma, but they have little awareness that the wellness industry is much bigger and has no guardrails, no professional bodies, no regulators, no ethical codes, no boards. Almost nada keeping them from making any wild-arse claim.
The water is definitely muddy, but you're right. There's almost no pushback against the grifters because the folklore is virtually dogma.
People accept it as folk wisdom, not as critical readers of scientific literature.