burreauxxx

No.

quote:

---

Drinkwitz. We could do worse.

---

No.

You don’t fire BK and be on the hook for $50M on top of assistants turnover, to then pay MORE per year for a guy who’s literally never accomplished anything of consequence.

No way.

They’ll go cheaper with a Dillingham/Sumrall type before they go that route imo.

Jesus people

Bauer fkn sharp

How did these guys beat out Xavier Atkins ?

Looks like Franks still tailgating

You can use a little bit of sense to figure most of this out

ND is heading to playoff again a year after he went to the championship game

He’s making $9M/yr and has a young QB in place who they can build around for two more years ahead. He's also a Midwest guy.

Arrogant to think he’s leaving imo

This isn’t a bad thing

Will motivate boosters to extend even more for the right coach

I’d find it pretty hard to believe that we’re interested in paying a guy 8 figures annually that’s never made a playoff or won any big games of note.

For anyone out there who’s suggesting Drink, you’re basically in belief that the above is possible because he’s already making $9M so it would obviously go up here. .

Can’t see it.

You don’t fire BK with a $50M liability along with assistant buyouts, then turn around and pay a guy like Drinkowitz more than BK.

If you’re willing to do that then you’re getting someone more proven. Like.a Heupel-level coach or better imo. .

First of all, he makes $9M which means you’d be paying him more than Kelly after having bought out the latter for $50M

Would be terrible optics for Verge et al imo. There’s absolutely nothing on Drink’s resume’ that’s even close to the guy you had. That alone is a reason to not go this direction.

They’ll either pay Drink-level money for a real perceived upgrade, like Kiffin, Heupel, etc

Or they’ll go for value with unproven candidates like Sumrall, Brady, etc imo