Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:10867
Registered on:8/31/2007
Online Status: 

Recent Posts

Message

re: History Channel Shows

Posted by Homeboy on 2/9/10 at 12:30 pm
Sucks now.

I started watching National Geographic Channel.
Military is good, too.

re: Liberal Propaganda (movies)

Posted by Homeboy on 2/9/10 at 9:56 am
Did you guys actually watch the movie?
quote:


[Note: You may perceive some of this column as a "spoiler".]

If you liked the politics of last weekend's Oscar nominees, you'll love "V for Vendetta."

It's an exciting, quality Bin Laden film.

But if you're like the rest of mainstream America--you support our troops, believe in firmly responding to terrorists on our own shores, and/or respect Christianity--then, don't waste your time at this piece of garbage masquerading as a superhero movie. It is anything but.

If most other Hollywood films subtly whisper of an agenda, "V" clocks you over the head with it with a still sizzling, iron frying pan of extreme leftism. It doesn't arrive in theaters until March 17, but already the mainstream (ie. liberal) movie critics and entertainment media are raving about this egregious attack on our war on terror.


"V for Vendetta":
Natalie Portman, Guy Fawkes Mask-wearing "V" Are Terrorist Heroes
Based on the graphic novel series of the same name, "V" comes complete with all the bogeymen the far left loves to hate: NSA spying and wiretaps; government renditions and torture complete with Abu Ghraib hood fashions; lecherous, elderly Christian clerics in collars raping young girls; Islam, gay rights, and free speech under attack; and even a Bill O'Reilly-esque evil cable talk show host/wicked pharmaceutical billionaire/heinous military officer combo rolled into one character.

Oh, and by the way, the hero of the movie: He's a terrorist in a Guy Fawkes mask, who blows up important government buildings. Sound familiar? His mask might as well be a kefiyeh wrapped around his head in a Nick Berg video.

The movie takes place in futuristic England, and there is only one American star (Natalie Portman, who plays the terrorist's protege). But it's quite clear to whom the "commentary" is directed: Joe and Jane American. When this movie takes place, "the United States of America" doesn't exist anymore. America is in the midst of a civil war.

And America and the war on Iraq are the enemies--along with Christians and the right--in this movie. We are treated to newscasts about how "America's War [on terror] spread to England." One character--a gay, British Jay Leno type who hosts a latenight show--keeps a secret vault of prohibited items, including a giant poster of "the Coalition of the Willing," depicting the American and British flags surrounding a swastika. Think about our troops fighting and dying in Iraq, before you decide to give your dollars to this film. Do you really think they are Nazis?

Also in the secret vault of sacred prohibited items: a Koran. Portman, whose Evie is the "heroine" of "V," asks, why the Koran? "Are you a Muslim?" she asks the late-night host. "No, but its [the Koran's] images are beautiful." Then he comments about how he can be executed for possessing the Koran. (Not a peep in this film about the thousands who've been executed in the name of the Koran and "its beautiful images.")

Puh-leeze. If anything, both Britain and the U.S. have bent over backwards not only for the Koran, but for its extremist Muslim followers. Where Christian displays are absolutely forbidden in any schools, despite so-called "freedom of speech"; where Ten Commandments are removed from the Alabama Supreme Court, despite their being the basis for our legal system; children are required to learn about Islam, read from the Koran, and behave as Muslims in elementary schools, in the name of "tolerance" and "education."

In "V", while Islam and the Koran are treasured but prohibited, Christianity is pure evil. Nice juxtaposition, when in real life, the 19 hijackers, the '93 WTC, U.S. Embassy, U.S.S. Cole, and British subway bombers were hardly Christians. Hmmm . . . what religion were they? We don't recall Mohammed Taheri-Azar, saying on Friday in his post attempted-murder 911 call, that he tried to use his jeep to kill Americans in the name of Jesus. No, he mentioned someone else's name, another religion . . . which are both nowhere blasphemed in "V."

We've already mentioned the high-ranking Christian priest, who regularly rapes young girls procured for him through an "agency." Before the priesthood, he was an evil military officer at a hospital where politically dissident youth had experiments conducted on them for the government (complete with Abu Ghraib-style hoods).

Then, there's the government. It's run by a religious Christian zealot. But not just any Christian zealot.

No. Chancellor Sutler is the supreme evil Christian. In order to get elected, he and the Bill O'Reilly-esque character (remember, before he became a cable host, he was a pharmaceutical CEO and made billions) arranged for hundreds of Brits to die from chemically poisoned water. The government said that terrorists did it, a story which became accepted fact and the conventional wisdom in media coverage. The fear that ensued garnered Sutler the chance to rule England, along with the martial law powers the English parliament gave him.

It's no coincidence that the symbol used for his government is some sort of Cross-come-Swastika combo. Not offended yet?

Under religious Christian zealot Sutler, gays are rounded up, imprisoned, tortured, and executed. Ditto for any dissidents, any left-wing activists, anyone who dares speak out against or flout the Chancellor's actions. Tell that to the ACLU, which seems to be running legal policy in our country, these days, and its partner in crime, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the wealthiest "public interest" group in the U.S., to the tune of hundreds of millions. We don't see any prospect of them being rounded up by the government anytime soon, unfortunately.

Under the religious Christian Chancellor, "unjust" Gitmo-style military tribunals and absurd NSA-style wiretapping is going on at every corner. Throughout the movie, we are shown vans of law enforcement personnel listening in to every home. As if that's what NSA wiretapping was about. It isn't, but "V" drills it into you the way the ACLU wants you to see it: every conversation in every kitchen, etc., secretly being listened in on and laughed at by guys in sweaty, rumpled shirts and ties.

The evil government law enforcement chief, Creedy, runs a meticulously ubiquitous surveillance program nationwide. If only our FBI's Robert Mueller were so competent, we'd be safe. Instead, he's cavorting with extremist Muslims and testified in depositions to ignorance of the most basic newspaper facts about Al-Qaeda.

Overall, the most outrageous thing about "V" is the ending. Instead of vanquishing terror, all of Britain sides with the terrorist hero of this movie. They celebrate his murder of all the top officials in government, his blowing up of the Houses of Parliament and other government buildings.

Terrorists and terrorism are the heroes, the government fighting them and trying to keep us safe are the enemy.

This is the glorious revolution? Osama Bin Laden must be very proud.

re: Liberal Propaganda (movies)

Posted by Homeboy on 2/9/10 at 3:56 am
Avatar anyone?

V For Vendetta. Conservatives are terrorists and blame Muslims to create a police state and ban gays.

A Handmaid's Tale. Christian conservatives take over government.

Pretty much every film made has liberal propaganda stuck in it somewhere.

re: Repo Man with Jude Law

Posted by Homeboy on 2/9/10 at 3:26 am
Repo MEN is the title.

Most Jude Law movies suck bad.

re: 24 sucks 2 weeks in a row.

Posted by Homeboy on 2/8/10 at 11:44 pm
This season sucks. I'm tuning out soon.

The white trash boyfriend story SUCKS. Worst subplot ever.

Show ran out of gas.

A Face in the Crowd

Posted by Homeboy on 2/6/10 at 1:07 pm
Very much ahead of its time.

Any fans of this film?

re: Dear John

Posted by Homeboy on 2/6/10 at 12:22 pm
My wife wants to see this shite.


:banghead:

re: Lovely Bones / Peter Jackson

Posted by Homeboy on 2/6/10 at 10:03 am
Sucked.

Father should have killed the killer.
Sharon Stone was HOT in the flick.

Listening to the director's take is kind of a cheat -- like the BLADE RUNNER commentary.

Where's the ambiguity?
Not a "dream" but it could have been an implant. That's kinda the big "?" of the film.

I love the previous seasons. Even with some annoyances they were entertaining.

THis season... kinda think they ran out of steam.

Try watching The Simpsons. The show that invented 'jumped the shark' has 'jumped the shark.' Watched half an episode last week and ZERO laughs.

re: The Crazies

Posted by Homeboy on 2/4/10 at 1:26 pm
Looks great. Started a thread on it last week.

Favre Injury Pics

Posted by Homeboy on 2/3/10 at 12:43 pm
No wonder he didn't run:

LINK

if it's Germans, sorry. don't live on this board.
Book was pretty damn good. Don't think it qualifies.

You'd need something kinda middle of the road that someone took and nailed it out of the park. Not a huge GUMP fan (the team or the film) but heard the book was absolutely horrible. So that's one.

Best and Worst -- TV Show to Film

Posted by Homeboy on 2/3/10 at 1:28 am
Last thread of the night I'll start but had to get this out:

Worst ever: The Avengers. Cool though dated British series and godawful film. Completely wasted the cast. Pathetic.

Best? I'm stumped. The Twilight Zone film was okay. Star Trek 2 and the recent reboot were entertaining but not classics. Lot of really bad ones. What am I overlooking?

The BBC Hitchhiker's Guide was better than the theatrical version, which did kinda suck.