supatigah

I wonder if this type of defense will be tried in one of cases where a poor woman with anger control issues shakes or beats a child to death

there are way more of those awful child abuse cases than a affluent suburban woman allegedly has severe post partum depression or psychosis

I am a non-practicing white too

quote:

---

I'm not dogging Charlotte but we have Atlanta, Nashville, Dallas and Houston in the conference that are all probably pulling more of this than Charlotte.

---

perhaps I am not making it clear what I am saying

in Charlotte you have a concentration of big business surrounded by hundreds of colleges in the Atlantic Seaboard Region and the city is built with a central rail line that a lot of the 23-30 year old professional types live off of and use for work

Of course Dallas, Houston, Nashville, Atlanta are all bigger and have more people but they are all very spread out and pretty much driving cities.

Charlotte has a metro train system that people actually use so the single women are more concentrated in apartments and condos in specific parts of the city. Not scattered all over the place

We had a business dinner at a cool Tapas restaurant right on the train line and were sitting by a big window. For two hours it was non-stop very attractive professional women in yoga pants and sports bras running, walking or walking their dogs. literally hundreds of them.

HOT

quote:

---

It's definitely not Charlotte by a mile

---

go sit at any Charlotte South or Mid City bar or restaurant on the Blue rail line around 5:30, look at the hundreds of 23-30 year old women running, walking or biking and get back to me

Charlotte is a major medical, Insurance, banking and Tech hub for SC, NC, VA, WV, MD and the city pulls graduates from schools in the ACC, SEC, and all of the smaller conferences in the region

quote:

---

Well, it used to be where all the hot SEC school coeds would go for jobs when they finished college.
Not sure if that is the case anymore

---

now it is Charlotte by a mile

quote:

---

Once you get used to it you wont park any other way. Its so much safer, prevents wrecks, side swipes etc

---

I am a back up parking and parallel parking ninja in my Ford Expedition

quote:

---

imagine if the white defense attorney had convinced the white judge to kick the sole black man off the otherwise all white jury to let the white women off the hook

---

:bow:

it's the progressive Kobyashi Maru

6 mins each to murder each child

she started with the 8 month old

then the 5 year old

then the 8 year old. The little girl saw her brothers murdered by her mom and ran away and hid in her daddy's office. Her mother hunted her down and then murdered her on the floor.

Clancy told each child to Go To God

she stopped in the middle to call her husband back after she missed his call while murdering her middle child and to tell him generic medicine was ok for her daughter's stomach ache. Then she murdered her daughter.

frick that bitch

quote:

---

Prosecution rebuttal witnesses

The first rebuttal witness called by prosecutors was forensic psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack. He interviewed Clancy in April of this year, saying she seemed normal but did tear up at points. He said she wasn't happy with the food at Tewksbury Hospital and wasn't interested in physical therapy.

---

quote:

---

"She described feeling miserable, not wanting to be alive," Mack said.

He concluded that Clancy probably suffered from a major depressive episode and anxiety. But he said there was no evidence that she was ever bipolar in a manic state, like the defense has argued.

Mack also cast doubt on the defense's main argument that Clancy was psychotic at the time of the killings because she was overmedicated.

"I can appreciate that she felt side effects and a degree of change from the medications that she took," he said. "I don't know that that feeling or belief is necessary psychotic."

---

quote:

---

Mack said Clancy told him that on the day of the murders, she heard a loud male voice in the late afternoon.

"The voice said, to the effect of, 'you should kill the kids, this is your last chance so that you can kill yourself,'' Mack said.

He said she described how she strangled and killed the children.

"She described that while that was happening, she was saying out loud, 'go to God," Mack said.

Mack also testified that Clancy seemed to know the difference between right and wrong.

"My opinion is that she retained the capacity required for having criminal responsibly for these actions," he said.

Contentious cross-examination between Mack and Reddington followed. Reddington asked how Mack investigated Clancy's past, and Mack answered it was by talking with Clancy after the murders and reviewing records.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

This story is fascinating and is easily one of the most important things happening at the intersection of AI and politics right now. It's critical everyone understands the situation because this is just the beginning of the AI infowars and psyops

Jacob Coxon, a relatively unknown AI researcher, gives the WSJ an exclusive story about his resignation from Anthropic and his concerns about AI

Twenty minutes after the WSJ story drops, Jacob posts on X about how he's concerned that AI could kill us all in a few years. This post now has over 149M views. For reference, Ilya Sutskever (a very well known AI name) left OpenAI in 2024 and his announcement post has fewer than 6M views as of today

Bear in mind, Jacob Coxon's X account had no prior posting activity public, but it is immediately reposted and boosted by numerous AI-doomer policy advocacy nonprofits funded by the same donor (Jaan Tallinn) who just happens to be one of the leading investors in Anthropic

We find out Jacob Coxon, who worked at Anthropic for only a few weeks, worked for a left-wing political advocacy group in 2021 (Newspeak). This organization is a British NGO with ties to hacking democracy, Hillary Clinton, prison abolition and extinction rebellion

Many major Democrat politicians are now using Jacob's X post to fear monger the public into voting to regulate AI. It just so happens Bernie Sanders has a bill already written to ban artificial superintelligence (ASI) and to create a new federal agency to protect the public from the dangers of AI. This bill was announced just one week ago on September 3rd

It would also place a temporary pause on "advanced AI" until a new federal regulator exists and has issued safety rules and a model-review process

Elon then points out how none of this feels organic, and Jacob decides to take a shot at him for firing some xAI researchers

Meanwhile, we know Anthropic has publicly asked the government to audit and block frontier models and Anthropic has run a state-by-state campaign for rules that only large AI labs trigger, meaning the rules are structured around barriers only frontier labs can easily clear (limiting competition)

There is extensive Anthropic personnel and financial overlap with the groups that wrote the Biden-era AI policies. It is well known information you can seek out if you want the detail

This all seemingly comes back to regulatory capture and political motives. None of this feels natural. Jacob can say these are his real views all he wants, and they may be, but there is clearly far more to the story

---