Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1111
Registered on:6/23/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:


Stop answering this a-hole so he'll go back to smoking his joint and blowing his uncle or whatever he does when he's not looking up debunked conspiracies online


what isn't true here, other then the technicality of 0.3 thc in industrial hemp

thanks
quote:



So, you're saying that Standard Oil got MJ/hemp banned, decades after it couldn't get itself broken into dozens of smaller companies?

Interdasting.


mighty selective there, wasn't there a number of other names and industry leaders named? think so, might have to scroll up have a page and check.

standard oil break-up was mostly fo-show, btw. it actually in a round about way benefited Rockefeller.

I'm saying the industries that would have been destroyed by hemp colluded to have it banned, that is literally a verified and accepted fact.
quote:

I couldn’t give two shits if hemp is used or not.....but I think it is quite clear that society can, and will continue, to thrive without hemp.


what is the point of this comment?

I'm asking if hemp was suppressed by capitalists?
quote:

Capitalism has played no role whatsoever. It’s been a regulatory government.


and who pulled those puppet strings?

could it have been capitalists named Hearst, who owned timber and paper mills and newspapers?

or the Dupont's, who created the chemical laden synthetic nylon.

or the Rockefeller's, who owned the oil industry

literally traceable evidence shows these capitalist titans did exactly that.
quote:

You have big problems with definitions I see. If something is illegal that means you get arrested for doing it.....from 1937 to 1970 it was not illegal to grow, sell, or utilize hemp in any way. Nobody got in trouble for it then.



you seem to have a big problem with honest internal processing.

hemp was banned in 1937 (that exact headline is used by credible sources), you are being extremely dense for no other purpose than trying to win the internet today.


DuPont, Hearst, Mellon, Rockefeller and others who's industries would have been destroyed by hemp made it literally impossible for the plant to be an industry leader. At the time of all of this a new machine was created to the make hemp extremely profitable. Popular Mechanics magazine front page: The New Billion Dollar Crop. That was shut out by the capitalists who wanted to remain in power. There was technically ways to get granted the right to grow it, but intentionally it was also impossible at the same time.

You are being educated right now. Be thankful instead of trying really hard to make this work out in your favor so you feel better about yourself. You are literally making a joke of yourself.



the snitching element is in part a psyop against white conservatives

it's unlikely most of these stories are real as it's also unlikely most of the names and faces seen at the capitol riot are real

there is even a decent chance none of that stuff happened in real time like they say
just imagine if you ignorant fools would have watched some more 911 documentaries. we'd not be in this position now.

imagine just fricking imagine if I or other 'conspiracy' people posted a documentary from a frickING PILLOW GUY and said this was the proof.

It would be laughed off this site.
quote:


the Qmunity isn't close to 75M strong, bubba



what a retarded and irrelevant comment

the community of people who voted for trump is at least that
quote:


Yeah. That's why biomass fuel for cars is soooo cheap compared to gasoline


how can you even be serious here - comparing current prices to what might have been before established industry and supply chains, and what was a viable way for people (mostly farmers) to make their own fuel.

I can't take this level of trolling seriously. you're banned until you can be real.

quote:


Well, capitalists tend to prefer a market with products to buy or sell. Central planning folks (i.e. not capitalists) tend to want to restrict and vector folks into single/no choice options.



sounds an awful lot like Standard Oil and William Hearst, the big players in making hemp illegal
not to mention the William Randolph Hearst angle, in which he owned the timber to paper mills that were used for his newspapers.

huge campaign by him to make hemp illegal as to not cut into his profits
quote:


Setting aside the arguability of this statement, the answer (not the one you are looking for) is CORRUPTION and efforts at population control.

Americans have always scared somewhat easily (despite our notions about "toughness" of prior generations), and government officials (not "Capitalists") used a whole range of scare tactics to gin up support for a broad range of prohibition measures from the 20s (during the alcohol prohibition era) through the late 30s (peak of The New Deal(tm)).

Trying to pin this on "capitalism" is very akin to trying to pin prohibition of prostitution on "capitalism" - nonsense. It is government elites who push such policies, enact them, enforce them, sustain them and, ultimately, benefit from them.

"Capitalism" would gladly sell a valid product in a competitive marketplace.



do you even know a main reason alcohol was prohibited for a short time? oil

it was a way to centralize energy production because alcohol was a cheap, decentralized way to produce fuel. the money behind prohibition trace to the oil-garchs.

your analogy was laughably retarded. there is no comparison to a product with hundreds of great uses and zero negative effects to a women selling herself on a street corner and societies decision to outlaw that in the public domain.

you are coping by trying really hard to find an answer that doesn't incriminate your favorite ism.

those in control of industries through collusion and government ownership didn't want anything to disrupt the trajectory of their power and control. Period.
quote:

Or make you care that your dick don't work right.

Wait... I guess that's what it's cousin does, isn't it?


you're thinking of what they call 'whiskey-dick'

the cousin of hemp is considered more of a helper in that area than a harmer
quote:

I fricking hate the gov't and the prohibition on anything, but what I really hate are these people that tout fricking hemp/CBD/THC as some miracle cure for ANYTHING.



sounds like you're pretty unaware of all the products it replaces and scientifically backed as being stronger or longer lasting on top of cleaner and more efficient

this isn't about the pathetically diluted cbd industry and your limited understanding of what the plant produces
quote:


Care to provide a link for your assertions?



all over the google's

for something like this, that is so well accepted by most already, I'm not going to do that work for you.

you old timers can handle a google spin
quote:

Also the shite hasn't been illegal for 90 years...it's been illegal/banned since 1970 which by my counts is 51 years....again 51 != 90



hemp was effectively banned in 1937 by making it literally impossible financially for anyone to grow and sell. The language was cleaned up in 1970 to remove wiggle room.

you are again, dense

quote:


The last 90 years doesn't mean shite...


it means a lot of shits when applied to the question in the op

and it means a lot of shits when you are talking about how it can interact in the market today after being suppressed so long, and it's not truly completely legal now in terms of anyone being able to go plant as much of it as they want.

you are dense and committed to not understanding the situation here
quote:

I've got a great idea for the Hemp guys....do whatever you have to do to get hemp cheaper than cotton...that's the only way it will take off.

Has the hemp industry been hindered by big business damn right they have....but why should big business purchase a product that is more expensive than what they can get know and make a decent profit off of?


I guess you're like incapable of seeing what the last 90 years of it being illegal may have done to the price.

what a dense reply. wow.
quote:


It is a good thing. I watched his stuff and it is not nutty, it is real evidence.


the election was a fraud.

but I swear all of you are motivated to see the truth and evidence

the literal SAME level of non nutty evidence exists for so many important things and most of you are incapable of having the same motivation to see it.