White Tiger

He had a very rough game.

Chattel slavery was part of the world at that time and not just in the US and Europe. It was on the way out for practical reasons. How the holy framers handled it in the Constitution is typical of the deception that marks governments the world over, but perhaps none more than that of this country. They never used the word slave, rather "individuals held to service" or some such. I do not have data regarding your claim about black slave owners other than there were some. Perhaps 25% of people in the South owned slaves and maybe a few percentage had more than one. The point is that the institution did not have quite the currency that Hollywood would have us believe. An interesting side bar to the history of slaving in the New World the story of Dr. Tony Martin who taught at Wellesley College. He had a singular experience at that institution for daring to shed some light on the subject.

NFL is four square behind wokeness. 100%. Don’t support it.

Cremo and Fomenko reach similar conclusions through different means. I see nothing wrong with Fomenko’s methods. The fact that no one has found any errors and his work has been ignored are ringing endorsements in my view.

Check it out.

In my historical inquiries, I have found, at the risk of sounding trite, that logic is the best evidence. What I have learned repeatedly is that the presented facts do not make sense together like the entire Civil War narrative which is plainly, a lie from start to finish. The states have the right to secede inasmuch as the Constitution is silent on this point. Eleven states voted, peacefully, to leave having realized that they were destined to be a permanent political minority subject to the wishes and whims of the northern states. The votes were not close. This fact is completely ignored by history despite a major narrative being that "your vote matters"! No discussion of the fact that giving women the vote has resulted in the promotion and perpetuation of most of what is wrong in this world today. There are sound reasos why women and others, were not allowed to vote. Why anyone in government or on the dole is allowed to vote remains unexplained beyond weak appeals to the false god of egalitarianism.

Nothing about the moon landings makes scientific sense. Now that we understand that relativity is nothing more than a model, we can ask questions like, "How are celestial distances measured?" I recommend Dave McGowan's "Wagging the Moon Doggie" which is an excellent thought experiment that completely collapses the Apollo missions.

More recent narratives such as the Las Vegas shooting lacked any semblance of rigorous forensic investigation such as autopsies available for public scrutiny, appropriate analysis of ballistics and the ponderous question of how Paddock got all that gear into the hotel unnoticed. Moreover, why did it take security so long to respond? Also, still no serious official analysis of acoustic data in the Charlie Kirk murder.

The NFL is not your friend.

Your postings savor heavily of AI, maybe especially ChatGPT. Am I correct? To your point regarding a single datum collapsing an entire theory/scientific system, Cremo and Thompson have described 19th century archaeological research locating evidence of the use of tools as remote as the Paleocene using conventional terminology. This puts tool-making many millions of years prior to the earliest accepted claim which is around 3 million years in the Pliocene. No one has raised serious critiques of this work which analyzed 19th century descriptions.

Fomenko's opus magnum was prompted by American astronomer Robert Newton of Johns Hopkins and NASA. He could not rectify ancient eclipse data using precise calculations based on what most people assume are fixed planetary/celestial motions. He assumed, erroneously according to Fomenko, that the historic timeline was a fixed boundary not open to question. Using statistical frequency analysis of literature from "ancient" times comparing same to recent and verifiable records, Fomenko proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the current timeline is not accurate. Anything prior to about the 13th century is probably unknown. He used the reigns of kings, wars and other notable historic events along with astronomical data to prove that many eras in history are actually duplicates. For example, it is the case that ancient Rome did not exist as we have been told. No one has brought any serious criticisms of his methods.

With respect to relativity, its weight bearing pillar concerns the speed of light in a vacuum. If that gives way, the entire system of relativity collapses. This quantity has never been empirically validated. Ever. Michaelson-Morley claimed that their experiment proved the non-existence of aether, something that had been posited as a medium through which light traveled. It need not be stated that an absolute vacuum (despite NASA's prior claims to the contrary) is both a logical and physical impossibility. Dayton Miller did multiple experiments over years under numerous conditions concluding finally that aether moved at about 10 km/s. The only criticism of his work has been intrerpretive.

Relativity at the end of the day is a more or less internally consistent model with no empiric underpinnings. Relativity's predictions are based on assumptiions regarding "space" that are not directly testable i.e. no way to make needed measurements. Appeals to parallax are bootless inasmuch as they make assumptions about the optical characteristics about space that are, well, unknowable at this time.

van Lomel and others have exploded the brain as the provenance of consciousness through the phenomenon of NDE, psychic phenomena of transplant patient which are both well-described. Also, look at multiple cases reported by John Lorber a neurolgist at the University of Sheffied in which patients had severe redutions of brain tissue, specifically the cerebral cortex who were intellectually and socially normal. One man who had perhaps 2 mm of cortex earned a double first in math and had an IQ of 126.

How's that?


:cheers:

From a logical standpoint a single datum can collapse a theory. I am convinced that our historical timeline has been manufactured. Science as a dispassionate pursuit is much as you have described. The problem lies in the fact that much of what is considered foundational is, in fact, false. Consider the provenance of consciousness. Like the physicists with gravity, neuroscience has no explanation for or of it. “Consciousness Beyond Life” by van Lomel is an excellent exploration of this completely ignored topic central to the metaphysical foundations of humans and all things actually.

Ask yourself who controls the media and government?
.