Favorite team:LSU 
Location:NELA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Atty at Law
Number of Posts:35176
Registered on:2/16/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

How many spending, or debt reductions has Trump proposed that Massie hasn't supported?

I guess none, since y’all just got through saying Trump hasn’t proposed any at all.
Your childish behavior and name calling doesn’t exactly invite any legitimate efforts to respond to the question(s).
quote:

all of Obama and Bidens spending was due to Massie voting for them

Has anyone actually said that, as you’ve clearly stated it right there? I have a hard time believing that.
quote:

It sounds to me like you don't want Republicans or Mike Johnson investigated for fraud.

Not the case at all, and I’m not sure why it even has to go there. That’s actually akin to the same tone and approach I was referring to in the first place.
That being tossed in at the very end is tantamount to an insurance qualification, sort of like the universally known “not that there’s anything wrong with that.” I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume the true sentiment is the one you led with.
quote:

Why? The motherfricker has lied his arse off and stalled as much as he could since being elected speaker. We all know both sides are guilty of all sorts of malfeasance.

This is one of your own comments in this thread. It was in response to a comment about giving Johnson the benefit of the doubt, the literal cornerstone of American justice. It strongly appears to me that you yourself have prejudged this matter, and him, as a lying malfeasant. I’m not making any assertions or insinuations about you personally, so don’t take anything that way, just emphasizing my original point.
Well, the exact words “he’s guilty, throw him straight in prison” aren’t necessarily used, but I think in a number of cases the sentiment is pretty clear. IMO in the majority of such cases, it’s a matter of simply disliking the individual subject of the allegation, any allegation, as opposed to the actual merit of the allegation itself.
quote:

Who is that guy? I checked his website and there is no "about us" page.

Doesn’t matter who he is. As you can see, there are some amongst us who already have Johnson in prison based on this allegation from this source. Lol
I’ve got an aversion to it. I can’t really explain, don’t even know if I could if I wanted to. It’s a strange thing.
I think you know I’m right. All good. No offense intended at any point.
quote:

Beware of the freak out humiliation session that awaits you for speaking out against the Trump administration.

Bro, when there’s some criticism of something or someone on an internet discussion forum, and then there’s a reaction or response to the contrary, why does that bother or surprise people, at all? That’s sorta how the whole thing works, is it not? It’s totally acceptable for there to be a reaction in opposition to a criticism of any aspect of the Trump presidency, just as it’s totally acceptable to issue the criticism of/against it in the first place. In fact, it’s expected in a forum like this.


And no, there’s no imbalance in the fervor associated with opinions or views going one direction or the other.
I mean, regardless of whether one supports this administration or not, are you not able to draw another interpretation from those words, specifically “just getting started?” Y’all seriously haven’t had any experience with that saying? It’s not exactly an uncommon one. You’ve never heard someone, maybe a coach of a team that’s had a burst of success and says “we’re just getting started”??

Some of you try way, way too hard on the whole Trump criticism thing. When it’s clearly deserved, that’s one thing. But when you force it in every single instance and aspect, all that does is discredits and diminishes the moments scattered in there wherein you may actually have a valid point.
quote:

Yet he’s a guy hardcore MAGA continually hates on and blames for obstructing Trump. Make it make sense.

That would be a vocal minority of loudmouth drama queens who have apparently been taught that they should get everything they want, er, demand or throw a fit for, in life.

That’s how it makes sense - well, at least for everyone other than said loudmouth drama queens.
quote:

This is how you know the fix is already in.. INVITE vs. SUBPOENA

I’m neither defending nor condemning anyone here, but some of you are just looking for stuff to be outraged about. It’s absolutely commonplace for a committee chair to first invite voluntary appearance, and if the individual/witness refuses to appear THEN a subpoena goes out to compel appearance.
quote:

You people don't understand that there are many competing interests and factions at play in Congress, with divisions among Republicans and not just between Democrats and Republicans. You can't just ram through policy you want simply because Republicans have the majority. The GOPe is the problem. They won't get out of the way and let the will of the voters prevail. They are purposely obstructing and protecting the DC blob.

This guy gets it. Big time.
Lol. “This bunch”. The overly broad brush with which you paint a generically undefined “bunch,” including I guess everyone but yourself, immediately discredits your attempted assertion. C’mon, man.
Oh I believe you’re exactly correct. It’s been a very self-defeating recent time period for the fella. Very, very poor strategies and decisions.
I believe Massie’s precise plan is to present himself as a “maverick” who will eventually be what he believes is an obvious replacement for the previous “maverick” that has clearly been a popular choice for Kentucky voters. IMO this is all a self-promotional stunt by Massie to position himself for when Rand Paul decides to hang it up.

re: Massie Floating Bondi Impeachment

Posted by davyjones on 12/30/25 at 2:07 pm to
At first I thought you were talking about Massie. :lol:

But I think it could be the case for both.
Honestly, and I realize this is probably gonna come across a little sassy, but I’m convinced that as a general matter there isn’t going to be much reasonable or rational commentary on this subject from anyone other than attorneys, and even more specifically from those who practice criminal law. There’s just way too much nuance and procedural aspects/obstacles and subjective factors for the non-lawyer to identify and factor in. I see an epidemic of oversimplification and ignorance of (no insult) a vastly more complicated matter than most will understand. If you know, you know.

I may not approach “expert” status on many subjects, but on this one I’m pretty confident, having bounced back and forth between the defense side and the prosecution side. I’m currently the latter, so I’m not exactly talking outta my arse…..this time. Muahahahaha