Favorite team:LSU 
Location:NELA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Atty at Law
Number of Posts:37595
Registered on:2/16/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
They ain’t worried about the actual war aspect of this war, but rather irrefutable evidence of muh broked prawmiss. Trump prawmissed them that there would be “no wars.” Full stop, as far as they’re concerned. Which I guess would confuse the shite out of them, say, if an attack on our homeland occurred……remember, Trump promised no wars!! They didn’t even think to say anything about an exception for reprisal for an act of war, perhaps right in their home town!! Gotta let it slide.
You’re probably talking about the Taliban when you say “the Afghans.” Not a fully organized, uniformed national army. There’s a vast difference between the two.
:lol:

So what about the all the same negativity before the war? What’s the excuse for that negativity? Or “negativity for sport,” as it were.
Yeah, that’s how Americans communicate that a person sucks - electing the person to the Presidency, and not by a small margin either. :lol:
Vainglorious people aren’t exactly prone to soliciting advice from others very often, hence the excessive value a vainglorious person assigns to his or her own beliefs and ideas. So your effort to drive the lane and a power dunk has been swatted up into the upper deck.
Exactly. It’s a matter of “pleasure,” not necessarily legit criticism or evaluation, when it comes to Trump. Sometimes the truth accidentally slips out.
I’ve never heard or seen any reference to the Saudi military being noteworthy or remarkable in any way. Certainly no more so than any other in the region.
Yeah the “principled” folks seem a bit oblivious to the fact that when a couple few of them get to boasting of their superior in every way “principles,” they fail to realize for a single moment that they’re not even on the same page with each other as to what actual “principles” they’re talking about. Each of them thinks the other has the exact same list and description of top “principles” as he or she does. :lol:
I love how you all toss “conservative” around as if any two you in reality even use the same definition. Most people don’t even realize it, lol.

With all due respect, I might add.
Y’all been hoping and praying for that bottom to fall out for several months now. Maybe it’ll hit for y’all. I certainly hope and pray not myself, but that’s just me.
Well, they did get “hit hard,” and there’s a large difference between “he said he would help them” and what you’ve attached there, which is referring to punitive action for their transgressions against the referenced protesters.
quote:

Such as?

Your insinuation clearly being that Trump left those people hanging, then they got slaughtered, I was referring to everything I quoted.
quote:

You mean like when Trump said he would help them in January and then stood by and did nothing while 30+ thousand died fighting for their freedom?

I believe you’re taking some liberties there, and then some.
quote:

Or Iran is good at propaganda.

Many amongst us don’t want to hear that. Which is quite telling. I.e. they want it to be the exact case as described in the piece.
Dang. Well then who ran Cornyn’s campaign that lost to the one you just described there? Must’ve been pretty bad. :lol:
And to make such an admission, ie “uncalled for,” or any sort of admission of wrongfulness, is one of the rarest occurrences on this site……so kudos to you for your willingness to do so. Just me personally here, but I tend to think highly of that. :cheers:
quote:

I used to give morons like yourself some benefit of the doubt. I read all those articles insisting we needed to understand the plight of ignorant trash (again, like yourself) and how sadz you were when industry, technology, and society as a whole moved the frick out of Shitville, Arkansas and that your dumbassery was actually my fault, and I'd think to myself, “Shame on Trump for exploiting these mentally defenseless idiots.”

Someone must’ve roofied my drink with a heavy dose of crazy pills.
If it doesn’t go completely to plan, pre-war plan that is, then it’s a failure. All successful wars did and do so. :lol:
Has anyone said “They’d matriculate perfectly, present day, and just as it is now they were mere puppets to globalist puppet masters”?? ……the only difference being every person in the room was chain smoking then.


Any said that yet? Or anything along the lines of puppets, puppet masters, globalists, cabals etc? Surely I’m not the first.
I wouldn’t have bothered asking you. :lol:



Too many words to process.
Honestly, I believe the administration, and its operators, agents and assets possibly in Iran, were taken by surprise by the level and extent of our own citizens’ (including even many supposed “conservatives” amongst us) openly trashing the military effort, which contributed (or spurred) MSM’s own same actions, but to an international audience, including I’m sure compilations of nonstop examples shown relentlessly by the regime in Iran. Which of course leads to diminishing confidence that America as a country is up for it and instead a bunch of pussies.

Thus we could have been trying relentlessly ourselves to “set something up” in this arena, but the embedded assets/contacts may well be reporting back “we’ve been met with reluctance and distrust by vastly more potential insurgents than we initially predicted.”

Feel me on that?