tigress4life

Don't you realize all these photos, and videos were found, the stories written and posted just as the guy's name is released.

Want to 'splain that?

Sanders and the Dems were never held culpable for a lib Sanders supporter shooting Steve Scalise.
None of the lib-turd press blamed Bernie, so frick em, don't care what POS press, or actors that play pretend , or someone who plays children games for a living, think, say or do.

POS coward. Hasn't that been going on over a decade? The Lib-turd press allows the perpetrators of these attacks to define their actions as a game instead of the hate crimes they are. The frickin knockout game.

Vast majority of victims either white or elderly, and almost all of the assailants black. The only time that I know of that the attacker was charged with a hate crime was a white guy that punched a black elderly man.

Now Lib sites like Slate claim it's not going on, just normal street crime, hasn't spread to other cities outside the northeast, is not real, and my fav, despite on going video evidence these attacks happening, it's just a right wing myth.

Mystery Solved

Video of a guy dressed as female leaving "bombs"

quote:

---

Our support of the #BlackLivesMatter movement follows other investments that have taken very different paths, including the Dreamers and Occupy Wall Street. USP grantee United We Dream (UWD) for example, a youth-led organization formed in 2009 by undocumented students and other advocates, changed the narrative about undocumented people and continues to be a major player in the immigration reform field.

---

This is from an Open Society memo that is funded by globalist George Soros.
partial list of orgs funded by Soros

Soros has overthrown governments, destabilized societies all over the world. Neo-libs here are just "useful idiots" following his agenda which is destroying the National Sovereignty of countries that make up western civilization.

I saw the speech, real time. The article is as most from Big Media, very misleading.

It was members of the audience, workers from the plant he was visiting that apparently are waking up to the fact that Dems have been lying to them for decades, workers that realize Dems don't care about their well being.

It was those members of the audience that used the word "Treason" to describe the actions of Dems.

President Trump was responding to the audience.

Milo and guest

Milo was the first openly gay man to call out Libs for their all encompassing support of the muslim religion even though Islam calls for execution of homosexuals, and he has pointed out executions of homosexuals in muslim countries.

He also went to Sweden and marched to protest rape against women there. Primarily by muslim immigrants, and that fact is bolstered by the Swedish governments own numbers.

So yeah, I like the guy.

And I know why he was fired.

quote:

---

True, but if he ever rises to the forefront again, for any reason, the left can always shoot him down with the pedo comments

---

And yet the loony left supported and protected NAMBLA for decades.

And libs always take great pains to distinguish homosexuality and pedophilia but they can't seem to understand Milo wasn't promoting anything just relating his own sexual experience.

quote:

---

His only crime is appointing Meuller. Then, when he is replaced, his replacement will shut down the investigation. That’s been the goal of all of this.

---

So you think Rosenstein threating Nunes and other members of Congress is NOT a gross abuse of power.

Congress HAS oversight authority of ALL Federal agencies.
According to Gregg Jarrett:
In a meeting with Chairman Devin Nunes, FBI Director Christopher Wray and others, the source says that Rosenstein threatened to subpoena the texts and emails of Congress because he was”tired of dealing with the Intelligence Committee.” If true, Rosenstein must resign or be fired

Neo-libs modern Democrats are FOLLOWERS of:
The Father of Political Correctness, the most influential leftist in Academia, Entertainment Industry, Media industry in the U.S. of the Twentieth Century, and continuing today.

Cultural Marxist Herbert Marcuse:

quote:

---

Given this situation, I suggested in 'Repressive Tolerance' the practice of discriminating tolerance in an inverse direction, as a means of shifting the balance between Right and Left by restraining the liberty of the Right, thus counteracting the pervasive inequality of freedom

---

quote:

---

Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance: ... it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word.

---

And this is why education in Unis are more about indoctrination than education. Creating generations of like followers.

quote:

---

neutral, value-free, formal aspects of learning and teaching now become, on their own grounds and in their own right, political: learning to know the facts, the whole truth, and to comprehend it is radical criticism throughout, intellectual subversion. In a world in which the human faculties and needs are arrested or perverted, autonomous thinking leads into a 'perverted world'

---

The bases for discourse isn't logical, or objective because Marcuse, that is, cultural marxism specifically denies logic, objectivity as what is wanted in society.

quote:

---

The pre-empting of the mind vitiates impartiality and objectivity: unless the student learns to think in the opposite direction, he will be inclined to place the facts into the predominant framework of values.

---

This is why everything is viewed through political lenses, Dems can do no wrong, and Republicans can do no right.

So you now realize my generation had reason to call them, "the lunatic left", the "loony left", and my fav the "loony tune left"

quote:

---

Give us some facts to back that up. Thanks.

---

Question to me?

Frankly it fits well within Marcuse belief system which is modern political correctness.

Marcuse identified and promoted the idea of creating victim groups within a society, not because he cared for these proposed victims but to use these groups to create disorder, conflict, violence within society as a whole.

These "victim groups" become protected classes, again not for their benefit but to promote an in-equality which will promote strife within traditional society.

Marcuse specifically rejects logic, reason, objectivity as a means to determine truth. Like most ideologues his truth is relative or basically what one can convince of is truth, there are no acceptable objective measures.

Everything is political to Marcuse.

And in phraseology he is mostly opposite from it appears as a meaning.

MLK's nonviolence per Marcuse was actually violence, Black Panther violence is actually non violence, and so on.

"liberating" Tolerance according to Marcuse is:

Anything a Leftist does is ok, one should never criticize a leftist.

Nothing a non Leftist does is ok, particularly any action of a conservative.

If a leftist commits any vile act or if a Leftist POLICY destroys the economy, even if a leftist policy leads to the deaths of millions of people.

That's OK, that's acceptable because Marcuse's intent is to destroy traditional society here in the U.S. Nothing within Marcusean belief system would create a civil society because that's not its intent.

But back to Liberating tolerance (actual the intolerance of the left)

If a non leftist particularly a conservative creates millions of jobs, stimulates a booming economy, that is a bad thing because that would not further the leftist goal. Even if someone cures cancer, that's bad because it would create a positive view of society, and Marcuse promoted only a negative view, any positive view of traditional society could not be tolerated.

Political correctness is the fruition of Marcuse intent for every individual's action to be viewed only through a political lense.
The only important education is indoctrination according to him.

How does this fit in Steinle's case?

Marcuse would identify Zarata as part of a "victim" group and therefore a protected class.
Not because he thought he was a victim but simply because traditionalist, conservatives object to illegal immigration, particularly criminal illegal immigrants.

As a individual victimized by "hate" speech, by inequality endemic in our racist, zenophobic society, he is simply a product of society, (per Marcuse) though his action killed a women, he cannot be held responsible for his actions.

Of course I don't agree at all. Marcuse was nuts and his followers equally so but their influence in institutions are considerable.

And of course Open borders is an essential leftist policy because it creates constant destabilization of mainstream society, and the whole intent of Marcusean Neo Libs is to destroy what is considered to be the traditional American society.