DesenselessPlayer
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 299 |
| Registered on: | 10/23/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 3:31 pm
quote:
I love it when some nobody/alter calls out a board veteran as being an alter.
You mean Ree? The guy that (according to another thread) never posted anything for years after joining but all of a suddden the moment Orgeron was hired became one of the most active accounts on the forum? Yeah, nothing suspicious about that. Lol
2
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 3:23 pm
So there is no way that I could have been just reading the forum before? That’s beyond possible?
Is it beyond possible that I’m not an alter at all but maybe a friend of someone else who posts here and that this friend is filling me in on information regarding the board?
Again, you are projecting on me what is true about you/Ree/Roger.
It’s so obvious that those three accounts are from the same person. They have the same tendencies in their wording.
Is it beyond possible that I’m not an alter at all but maybe a friend of someone else who posts here and that this friend is filling me in on information regarding the board?
Again, you are projecting on me what is true about you/Ree/Roger.
It’s so obvious that those three accounts are from the same person. They have the same tendencies in their wording.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 3:15 pm
quote:
Review his post history. He's gonna be banned quickly.
For? Yet you, Ben, and Ree personally attack people on a daily basis here.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 3:09 pm
quote:
Nah man, only people on TD dislike O
My neighbor loves Orgeron. He’s been telling me about this “rebuild” since the hire.
I asked him yesterday to point specifically how we are better off now than we were under Miles.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 3:06 pm
quote:
Bitching about stuff from years ago blows the cover that nobody bought anyway.
Or maybe I live in Louisiana and hear what people have been saying since Orgeron was hired.
Don’t get mad that I’ve called you and your alter accounts out. That’s called projecting.
re: McKay explains why there is no need to melt about the DL recruiting
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 3:03 pm
quote:
If LSU signs a very good Dline class next year this will not be a problem either.
Oh? So experience doesn’t matter now? I was assured that experience was key and one of the main reasons our lines were so bad this year.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:41 pm
I agree, the formula is a bit flawed. But, my point was, we are now getting into the area of “no excuses”. Basically (and I may have expressed it in an unclear way) I’m saying everything going forward is pretty much 100% Orgerons success or 100% his failure. He’s been given enough time to “rebuild”. He has “his players and staff”. Aside from something crazy happening like Burrow getting a season ending injury, we should see vast improvements this year. That’s pretty much the only position that losing a player at would be a legitimate excuse for not seeing improvement. You can’t say “but we lost a linemen A”. If he was truly doing his job, he would have recruited well enough on the lines that losing one or two guys wouldn’t totally rank your season. No, the QB position is the ONLY position in football where losing that one player for the season is a legitimate excuse for your season to go poorly.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:26 pm
I can see why you think that and in hindsight I probably should have said “I no longer want to hear (but muh rebuild)”. I apologize for the confusion.
However, my post was specifically about the post definitely no longer being usable as an even remotely legitimate excuse. These are now almost completely Orgerons players.
If he can’t get it done by 2020, he isn’t the answer.
However, my post was specifically about the post definitely no longer being usable as an even remotely legitimate excuse. These are now almost completely Orgerons players.
If he can’t get it done by 2020, he isn’t the answer.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:13 pm
He switched back to the Ree account. Lol
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:12 pm
quote:
I don't think anyone really cares what you want. It's just kinda funny to watch you melt every day.
Go away Ree. People who actually know football are talking here.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:05 pm
The “rebuild” excuse has been used since Orgeron took over. I’m pointing out that this “excuse” can no longer be used. (It was always invalid because if you do the 4 years prior to this ranking you will still end up at #3 or #4).
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:01 pm
quote:
Most of these "excuses" are in your imagination.
And in the heads of the ones who used them.
Edit to add
Oh look! Ree changed accounts!
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 11:59 am
quote:
Wait. It looks like 2/3 of this score is based on this year’s class, and another 20% on last year’s class, right? So does that just confirm that the rebuild is happening?
It confirms that it can no longer be used as an excuse. Orgeron has had enough time to “rebuild” and this verifies it. If we are “weak” in one position, (I.e. defensive line or Offensive line) it is now 100% on Orgeron. No more excuses.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 11:48 am
quote:
But muh rebuild the trenches.
A swing and a miss. Just like Orgeron recruiting linemen.
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 11:43 am
quote:
3. LSU
But muh rebuild.
re: Dandy's signing class grades by postion
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 11:39 am
quote:
Which, after QB, is the most important, and the reason we get our asses handed to us by Alabama and Florida.
Orgeron tried real hard to get some linemen. That’s all that matters.
Or so I’m told.
re: Dandy's signing class grades by postion
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 11:37 am
quote:
More copy and paste. Do you ever post anything original? Wait I know the answer..
Careful. He’ll get on one of his alter accounts and call you a woman.
re: Dandy's signing class grades by postion
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 11:36 am
Tiger Ree is the Toby Flanderson of the Rant.
re: Hannigriff and Ott making excuses why we shouldn't expect to beat Bama
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 9:10 am
quote:
As soon as you drop the delusional shite about me getting paid.
You are doing this for free?
re: A&M’s best recruiting class ever
Posted by DesenselessPlayer on 2/7/19 at 12:08 am
quote:
ESPN has A&M 3rd.
Lol. ESPN rankings.
Popular
28
