Favorite team:LSU 
Location:College Station, Texas
Biography:New Orleans native living in College Station.
Interests:Hunting and fishing, tennis, food.
Occupation:
Number of Posts:228
Registered on:6/14/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Real Per Capita Gross Domestic Product-St. Louis Fed[

Two problems: (1) that is nominal GDP, so it doesn't account for inflation over time, and (2) population has grown over that period as well. Real (inflation adjusted) per capita GDP grew from about $50,000 in 2000 to about $69,000 in 2025, or about 1.3 percent per year over that time period.
I was in Prague this past fall. The Czechs are still not happy that Patton's troops were ordered to stop advancing because there was an agreement among the major powers to let Russia occupy Czechoslovakia. It appears that but-for this order, Patton could have (and would have) easily occupied the territory and spared the citizens of Czechoslovakia decades of brutal misery at the hands of the communists.
quote:

It was companies/corporations buying in larger quantities to help buffer against the elevated tariffs while these negotiations are underway


i.e, investments in inventory. My point stands.
Go back and take more economics classes. Do you ever wonder why imports are subtracted from the GDP formula? The answer is because you are trying to measure DOMESTIC production and if you don't subtract them, you can't do that. Further, import sales are captured in other parts of the GDP formula (consumption spending and investment spending), so not subtracting them leads to double counting. Yes, there was a surge in imports. People either bought them for consumption (causing an increase in consumption spending) or for investment purposes--buying equipment or machinery for example (causing an increase in investment spending). If you don't subtract imports, you do not measure domestic spending. Relying on the surge in imports to argue that GDP is actually better than it looks is simply incorrect.

re: Karoline just wrecked the Ap

Posted by DRMPHD on 3/11/25 at 3:18 pm
Once again, this ignores reality. If Canada could not produce steel at or below competitive prices in the U.S., then users would not import it anyway and tariffs would be irrelevant. To the extent U.S. steel users do import Canadian steel, it is because they cannot get steel of the same quality for a better price from other sources, including from U.S. steel producers. Thus, imposing a tariff harms those users and drive up the prices of the products they produce. It's basic economics.

re: Karoline just wrecked the Ap

Posted by DRMPHD on 3/11/25 at 2:38 pm
quote:

You can argue whether or not that hurts the individual consumer, but it unquestionably helps the industries that employ American workers.


This is simply not true. It may help some industries, but it hurts others. Think of all the companies that use steel in manufacturing their products. Raising steel prices via tariffs raises their costs, lowers their profitability and production and reduces employment in those businesses.

If Trump wants to use tariffs as a short term bargaining strategy, fine. But let's not fool ourselves. Tariffs will raise prices, reduce efficiency and increase unemployment if maintained for an extended time period.
Warning, a long article, but very interesting and pretty balanced interview with a historian on Trump, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the limits of American power and the relationship between America and China. Very fascinating, and I think more pre-Trump than one might expect from the New Yorker:

Can Ukraine - And America - Survive Donald Trump?
quote:

Ukraine needs to hold an election


You do know that the Ukrainian constitution does not allow elections during a war in which martial law has been declared. Unlike Putin's Russia, it appears Ukrainians respect their constitution as even the "opposition" parties that Trump officials allegedly talked to have rejected elections during wartime LINK Ukraine's Opposition Leaders Reject Wartime Elections
The only rational explanation I have seen is someone on National Review saying we will never see the files because Epstein was likely an intelligence asset for one or more countries (including the U.S.) If he was collecting information or honey trapping bigwigs on behalf of intelligence agencies, it would make sense not to release that information.
Or, maybe they can do a deal with China. China would do the deal and they have more influence over Russia. That may mean Trump has less leverage than he thought. We will see.
I shipped Haydel's king cakes to clients for years. They have always been somewhat pricey, but lately they have gotten ridiculously expensive to ship. I stopped sending them a few years ago. I don't really have a better recommendation--just wanted to complain and warn you should you decide to go that route. I do really like Haydel's king cakes. Just be prepared for the sticker shock!

re: Fun fact about Canada

Posted by DRMPHD on 1/7/25 at 12:41 pm
quote:

Canada is one big Massachusetts. No thanks.


+1

re: Fun fact about Canada

Posted by DRMPHD on 1/7/25 at 12:36 pm
I think you people do not fully appreciate what an economic basket case Canada is. If added to the U.S. it would rank 50th in per capita GDP, ahead of only Mississippi.

Ranked U.S> States v. G7 Countries
If Francis doesn't press Joey to get his soul right before its too late on the killing of babies and the mutilation of children, he is more of a failure of a pope than I thought
I mean, Major Burns is about to enter his 15th year of eligibility. He will pick up the position finally next year!
That would likely be deemed collusion by the colleges and a violation of antitrust laws. The NFL gets around that because players are employees of the teams and unionized, which allows for collective bargaining between the teams and the players over things like salary caps. Barring unionizing college athletes, the colleges would not have the same exemption from the antitrust laws.
They should put QR codes all over every athletic facility on campus where fans can scan and donate. That’s my two cents.
I thought the same thing. This is something more than just a disgruntled customer. Killer had to know the victims schedule. Went to a nearby Starbucks and apparently was only waiting for a matter of minutes before the victim walked out of his hotel at 6:45 AM. That’s not some guy just waiting around until the victim happens to walk out. That’s somebody who knew the victim would walk out at that time.
Killer had to have information on the victim’s movement. He went to Starbucks and apparently only waited outside the hotel for only 5 minutes before shooting him at 6:45 in the morning. I’d start to focus on people who knew his schedule for the day.

re: Gym bro problem of the day

Posted by DRMPHD on 11/19/24 at 4:46 pm
Tylenol is not an NSAID!