TenWheelsForJesus
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 10514 |
| Registered on: | 1/25/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Woman complains about society forcing her from being a stay at home mom.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/14/26 at 1:10 pm to tom
quote:
She thinks 21 year old her deserves a man bringing in 250k so she can hire a nanny and cosplay as a tradwife after spin class.
How did you get "hire a nanny" and "cosplay tradwife after spin class"? She literally said she wants one kid in her belly and one on her hip while she milks cows and harvests eggs. What she said and what you are claiming she wants aren't even in the same ballpark.
And the $250k was clearly your input, not hers. She just wants a husband to cover the bills while she handles the home. The same situation that has worked for thousands of years.
This woman is literally saying what conservatives claim to want, but half the posts are bitching about her. She clearly says she wants to be a stay at home mom, but she can't as a single woman. She says being a homemaker is more fulfilling than a corporate job. Isn't this what conservatives have supported in the past?
Even when they get what they want, conservatives still complain.
0
re: NBC NEWS, translated: "Democrats warned to stop saying stuff they believe out loud before
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/14/26 at 10:20 am to Jbird
Did democrats not get the memo that MAGA is dead and Trump has already lost the midterms?
re: Trump: Anything less than Greenland in the hands of America is unacceptable
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/14/26 at 9:55 am to LSU0358
quote:
Yay more welfare recipients on the dole.
I guess we'll have to extract the trillions in minerals beneath their feet to pay for them. How will we ever recover?
This highlights the short-sightedness of conservative principles. If we can get $1 trillion extra GDP by paying out $100 mil in welfare, then anyone with common sense would say it is worth it. Being against welfare on principle is fine, but blanket solutions to problems will regularly return bad results.
Solutions need to be tailored to the problem. Everyone in IT understands that even though best practices exist, they don't always resolve the issue. You have to look at each edge case individually to develop the most effective solution.
re: When will the “Supreme Court” “rule” on tariffs?
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/13/26 at 2:50 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
The Supreme Court isn’t a supervisory body that steps in whenever policy goes badly. It reacts to viable cases that survive standing and jurisdiction. If you think the courts failed, the real question is where the cases were supposed to come from and why Congress left so much discretion in the first place.
Texas vs Biden: Texas sued over the rescission of Remain in Mexico. SC chose to endanger the public and rule against the country.
The entire legal system is a clown show that causes as much harm as good. Conservatives are letting our enemies use the legal system to destroy us from within. We're stupid for allowing it, but that's bound to happen when you believe rules are more important than results.
re: So the tranny going before the SC today is named Hecox
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/13/26 at 1:54 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The question is whether the Constitution ALLOWS institutions to exclude them.
Well, the constitution doesn't explicitly say that you can't have sex with children. I guess if a state wants to make it legal to rape a 4 yr old, then we just have no choice, because by not specifically denying it means it is allowed.
Or... we can just use common sense.
The whole idea that we should do what is legal instead what is right is retarded.
re: The Republican majority passed 3 Dem bills tonight for more than $1 billion in spending
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/13/26 at 9:27 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
You don't understand how populism works. It's not about how much money is spent, or in most cases even what it's spent on. That doesn't make any difference at all to a populist.
This is just what you have to tell yourself to feel you are superior. It's no different than the left calling everyone racists and fascists.
This is typical of TDS. You always have to argue against a strawman because arguing actual facts would leave you with nothing to say.
What the money is spent on is the most important thing. It's always you people who bitch about spending no matter what it is, even when it is beneficial. So, now you are just projecting your inability to analyze individual expenditures onto others. You treat all spending the same because it's easy.
re: SCOTUS votes tomorrow on tariffs.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 11:37 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
But paying all of that money back isn't the SCOTUS' problem and that consideration is not part of their job. The tariffs (at least in this form) are either constitutional or not. How big a mess it will be if they are not should not be part of the decision making formula.
That's short-sighted. Everyone agrees Trump has the right to place tariffs. Forcing us to repay tariffs just so they can be reapplied is silly.
If a judge doesn't consider the consequences of his ruling, then he is not a good judge. The cure can't be worse than the disease.
Laws are there to protect citizens. If following the law doesn't protect the interest of the citizens, then what is the point of having the law? Your country at that point becomes about rules instead of outcomes. That sounds draconian and authoritarian to me. We need laws, but we also need to use common sense when applying them.
A judge willing to put the country in debt an extra $1 trillion dollars is not a patriot and shouldn't be a judge. And the weirdest thing of all is that the people who complain about spending the most will be happy about it because it will be a loss for Trump.
Harming the country just so we can say we did the right thing is selfish and myopic. We'll all be paying more in inflation if it happens because they'll have to print money, but at least we'll have done the right thing. We'll hold our heads up high while stretching every dollar.
re: Exxon not interested in Venezuelan investment — Trump is not pleased.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 2:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
We're still waiting on the President to fulfill his commitment to take over the Gaza Strip. Does the President consult with anyone before he makes these pronouncements?
How many terms will it take for people to understand Trump's negotiation style?
re: Exxon not interested in Venezuelan investment — Trump is not pleased.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 2:49 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:
If Trump's plan was to oust Maduro and have the Americans restore oil production, he should have talked to the Oil Execs on the front end.
Basing foreign policy on the opinions of CEOs seems like a bad idea. As a conservative, I'd prefer if corporations stayed out of foreign policy. That's how you end up with the MIC.
re: Voter fraud doesn’t happen. Ever. Ok, maybe a little. But, it’s isolated. Not widespread
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 1:49 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
One of the ways you know this is true is that it would be so so so much easier to find evidence for wide spread voter fraud and republicans have still presented absolutely zero evidence for it
This doesn't make sense. If most of the fraud occurs in states managed by democrats, how will the Republicans find and bring that evidence?
Why do democrat states repeatedly sue to prevent the fed gov from viewing voter rolls?
Why do democrat states sue to prevent voter rolls from being cleaned?
Oh, and there's that little story where over 100k ballots were ruled invalid in Fulton County alone. Kinda blows up your whole narrative, doesn't it?
re: Republican Senator Thom Tillis not happy with Trump Justice Department going after the Fed
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 12:31 pm to L1C4
quote:
When you don't have to fear repercussions by Trump, you can speak your own mind.
Look at Mr. True Conservative overlook wasteful spending just because he has TDS.
You are running defense for a $2b grift renovation, because you can't control your feelings. Don't ever complain about spending again.
re: The 'Ice Out' protest in NC is an AARP meeting for boomer white people
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 11:17 am to LB84
quote:
Boomers ruined this country. Most spoiled and virtue signaling generation ever.
I know right. All those boomers who died in Vietnam were just virtue signaling. All those boomers who grew up before welfare were just spoiled.
It's hilarious you think boomers are more spoiled than millennials and gen z.
It wasn't boomers who were receiving participation trophies.
It wasn't boomers who were passed in school so their feelings wouldn't be hurt.
It wasn't boomers who grew up thinking their feelings were facts.
It wasn't boomers who grew up thinking they had a right to wifi.
It wasn't boomers who showed up to interviews with their mom.
It wasn't boomers who complained about 40 hours a week being too much to handle.
All this generation talk is stupid anyways. Except for Gen X. We're better than all you schmucks.
re: Explain the “Judge blocks Trump on…” thing
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 11:06 am to Jesterea
quote:
I mean, the simple fact is that the administration has argued that the power of the executive is much larger and sweeping than any previous administration before it. The reason it happens so often is because they are doing unprecedented things. It’s part of the admins’ push on unitary executive theory.
This sounds good, but it falls apart when you look at the actual numbers. Trump has been sued more times than all presidents in the previous 40 years combined.
He is not doing that many unprecedented things. Also, Trump has already won at the SC, but district judges keep violating the orders of the SC.
You literally have democrats saying that the chief executive doesn't have the power to control executive branch agencies. You can't be dumb enough to think that President Trump wanting to control the agencies under his authority is "unprecedented."
Even after Trump wins, the democrats make up another bullshite excuse to sue him again. Only idiots think these lawsuits are legitimate and not lawfare.
re: Omar: ICE a ‘lawless’ ‘occupying force’
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/12/26 at 9:50 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I don't get why the Officer Noor case is supposed to be a burn.
It points out the stupidity of the left.
One innocent woman is actually murdered by a cop, but there was no outrage by the left.
Now, a criminal tried to murder a cop and was rightfully put down, and they are all in a tizzy.
You really don't see the significance of the comparison? It's all about leftist politics, not justice.
re: What is a viable option for our military regarding Iran killing citizens?
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/11/26 at 11:53 pm to 3down10
quote:
However, I'd donate to a private operation that air dropped food, guns and ammo to the people. Along with the importance of having a 1st and 2nd amendment with whatever government they replaced it with.
How many extra people will die between the time the military can drop weapons and the time it takes you private citizens to pool your money and gather resources to drop?
This is one of those times where principle doesn't meet reality. While you are working your principles, people will be dying. You are putting your ideology above human life and the success of the operation. That is zealotry.
Another problem with conservatives is that they are too timid to take advantage of a situation. If all it takes is a little effort and a few dollars to improve a situation, they will choose to let the problem grow instead. They prefer being inactive opposed to proactive.
re: I have a question about the ICE shooting
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/11/26 at 7:09 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
What do either of your insults have to do with the veracity of what our DHS Secretary told the nation?
It's a summation, not a point-by-point timeline. Nothing she said was false. You really are just looking for something to complain about.
re: So I guess we are going to have a new war in Iran
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/11/26 at 2:56 pm to tyler925
quote:
I’d say you can look at the history of neocon wars/military actions and come to a conclusion about this.
So, your argument is that Trump is the same as the past deep state presidents. It's possible, but the evidence suggests otherwise.
You guys were sure we were going to war in Iran. And then Venezuela. And now Iran again.
You are using "evidence" from 20 years ago to justify your opinion that Trump is starting a war when you could just be using the recent evidence of your repeated failures of predicting said war.
If you keep predicting a war, eventually you will be right. Just hang in there.
re: Noem calls Good's actions domestic terrorism
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/11/26 at 12:52 pm to mwade91383
quote:
That lib reporter who looked up easily accessible public information that she was pointed directly to by Noem And Vance. Like these dipshits did it TWICE!
The worst part is nobody in MAGA circles caught it the first time and said, “hey maybe don’t doxx our boy?””
Your lib friend chose to publish the address the LEO and his father. And you are blaming Noem. Did Noem force the agitator to publish it or is he an adult who made his own decision to feed innocent people to the mob?
You piece of shite leftists never take accountability for yourselves.
You're such a stereotype. A cookie cutter simpleton.
re: Breaking - US launching strikes against Syria
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/10/26 at 6:10 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
America first ?
Yes, killing terrorists who killed Americans is America First.
I took a history class once, and we learned that not one time has pussification defeated aggression.
I've always supported bombing people who harm Americans. Long before Trump took office.
What's the point of having a military if you're going to let foreigners kill your own citizens?
re: Any polling on Rand Puss or Massie being voted out?
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/10/26 at 1:38 pm to CitizenK
quote:
The only reason that Ron Paul was not defeated in a primary was because he brought home bacon like a mofo. As one local chemical manufacturer told me, "Ron is nuttier than a loon, but his earmarks make us wealthy"
This is a bad look for the Paul acolytes.
"We're against spending... unless it helps us get re-elected. All principles are out the door when it comes to our personal finances. But you other guys, you really need to tighten your belts for the good of the country."
re: Trump is doing everything he can to help midterms
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus on 1/10/26 at 3:45 am to 3down10
quote:
Socialism
"Everything I don't like is socialism!"
Let me add some more stupidity to the list:
Not wanting jobs shipped overseas - socialism
Not wanting monopolies - socialism
Not wanting to rely on foreign countries - socialism
Not wanting despondent youth with no jobs or houses - socialism
Not wanting 99% of the wealth concentrated with the 1% - socialism
Not accepting the monetary system that has been designed to screw over the average person - socialism
Wanting a fair market that benefits the middle class - socialism
It's amazing how many conservatives have been convinced to white knight for the uber wealthy and corporate power brokers while ensuring they stay disadvantaged all in the name of the "free" market that doesn't even exist.
These wealthy people buy politicians to pass laws that benefit them at your expense, and you just bend over and ask for more.
Popular
36
