Chancellor

quote:

---

The TRUTH is the British caused all of this with the Balfour Declaration and Israel compounded the issue with the help of several Arab states by forcing many non terrorist Palestinians to live in abject squalor. It has become a breeding ground for terrorism and when that happens you can’t be shocked by collateral damage in the process.

---

“Look what you made me do!”

You’re a piece of shite.

4cubbies.

Damn Africans. You can’t take them anywhere.

quote:

---

and he will never have a bill pass, because he refuses to saddle our next generation with more debt, and he refuses to vote on a bill that gives tax dollars to foreign entities and governments.

---

And THAT is why MAGA and dumbasses like a rooster hate him.

That is where all the Massie hatred and MDS started.

He wouldn’t suck Trump’s cock on huge omnibus bills that increase spending like they do.

Before BBB, Massie was a good Congressman.

But, he opposed big spending.

Which, ironically, is what every single one of these trashy arse fricks, here, claimed to want him and other Republicans to do… until Trump told them otherwise. :lol:

Those are some supremely stupid motherfrickers.

quote:

---

Here’s a dose of reality for you: Massie is going to lose big on May 19th. It won’t be close.

---

You’re are going to be soooo angry and hurt and disappointed when the Conservative doesn’t lose.

This is MAGA, now- anti-Conservative because Conservatives support the things they used to support before Trump told them to do something else. :rotflmao:

quote:

---

congressmen aren't impeached

---

Semantics. It really isn't the gotcha you thought it was.

So…. a company that has gone bankrupt twice, already, folded because fuel prices went up in the past 8 weeks.

That Pocahontas is one stupid, lying count.

And her pretending to be someone she isn’t would make even SlowFlowPretendPro blush… kinda.

Are PT posters who aren't real, legitimate attorneys, but pretend to be attorneys on the internet invited, as well?

Asking for SlowFloPretendPro.

quote:

---

Wrong. I said the spending cut didn’t happen. I even pointed out the cut was actually only one percent and was conditional. The conditions weren’t met and the cut didn’t occur.

---

No, you said, “That didn’t happen,” in response to me saying that Massie voted for the CR because it contained a 2% cut in spending.

The exchange can be found, HERE.

“That,” is a direct reference to Massie’s CR vote and his reason for voting in favor of it since that is the statement of mine that you quoted and to which were responding.

To paraphrase, I stated that Massie voted for the CR because it contained a cut in spending and you said he didn’t, or, as you put it, “That didn’t happen.”

But, it did, in fact, happen.

Now, perhaps by, “That didn’t happen,” you meant that the cuts for which Massie voted didn’t happen, later, but that doesn’t fit the context of the statement to which you were responding and is irrelevant, anyway. We were discussing Massie’s reasoning for voting for a CR during the Biden administration and how that is different than voting for an omnibus bill.

“That didn’t happen,” in context, is a refutation of the fact that Massie voted for the CR because it contained a spending cut, not a refutation that spending cuts subsequently occurred.

Now, given your severe retardation coupled with your general dumbassery, your failure to communicate unambiguously, intelligently, and contextually, although noted, can be forgiven, I suppose. After all, I can’t very well expect a supremely stupid frick like yourself to understand all written words or how to use them, yourself.

Regardless, whether or not spending cuts for which Massie voted were later enacted is completely irrelevant to the fact that the cuts were the reason he voted for the CR.

Also, the 2% figure was merely an aggregate or approximation. The spending cuts were a 1% spending cut from defense spending and another 1% spending cut from some other spending, thus 2%, although that 2% may not represent 2% of the total fiscal budget and wasn’t intended to do so.

quote:

---

Didn’t take you to be a disingenuous poster. He said there was a 2% spending cut in the bill. I replied that the cuts didn’t happen. He responded “Except they did.” That is still there in his post at 1:05.

---

Except it’s not and never was. Speaking of being disingenuous. :lol:

You said Massie did not vote for a CR that included 2% spending cut.

You said it didn’t happen.

I said it did.

And it did. Massie did, in fact, vote for a CR that included 2% spending cuts. As I told you in the post at 1:05, that’s a fact, dipshit.

You are one supremely stupid motherfricker and a trashy arse liar to boot. :lol:

And, now, look at you and your fellow retards melting because Massie will be re-elected after not voting to increase deficit spending.

Just damn.

Bonds and MAGA from the beginning of time through 2024: “We have to cut spending and decrease the deficit. Also, we shouldn’t be the world’s police and shouldn’t get involved in more wars.


Massie in 2025: Votes against a HUGE omnibus bill that increased deficits and spending.


Bonds and MAGA in 2026: Reeeeeee! Massie is a RINO Democrat and he must be voted out because he voted against huge omnibus bills and increasing deficits and spending!!!! Reeeee! Muh melt. Muh TDS. Muh bots! Muh panicans!

:rotflmao:

Goddamn stupid motherfrickers.