
Powerman
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Dog Catcher |
| Number of Posts: | 170785 |
| Registered on: | 1/27/2004 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
Unless they told him they plan on bringing in another safety this year to replace Haulcy. Just because he was a backup this year doesn’t necessarily mean that they plan for him to be a starter next year.
So he doesn't think he can compete? :lol:
re: The LSU OL was bad but the RBs didn't help them out
Posted by Powerman on 12/31/25 at 6:29 pm to NotaStarGazer
They got handled pretty often by 3 man fronts...
quote:
Adaptation (microevolution) is a thing.
Darwin’s theory of Evolution doesn’t hold water. (macro evolution)
So if no new species can ever form then we have to have significantly fewer species than we did when we had "all of them" because we know they can go extinct. 99.9% that have ever existed are extinct. So you'd have to believe that humans existed when the first organisms existed.
There is no evidence to back this notion
re: Port of Call fired an employee and forgot she had their passwords for social media...
Posted by Powerman on 12/31/25 at 7:27 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
the only reason I go to Port of Call is because of the guy making burgers in the kitchen
The only reason anyone goes to any restaurant is because of the guy making the stuff in the kitchen :lol:
re: Darwin’s Doubt: the mathematical problem of evolution and DNA
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 9:06 pm to cssamerican
quote:
That isn't necessarily the case. You can hold the view that a single ancestral 'kind', like the original feline, possessed far more genetic diversity than any cat alive today. As that one group branched out and specialized into lions, tigers, and cheetahs, they 'devolved' in terms of total genetic potential, but multiplied in terms of the number of species. It’s not that the number of animals is shrinking from a starting point; it’s that the original, rich genetic code is being sorted into many different, specialized boxes.
But at the species level of taxonomy most species that have ever existed have already gone extinct. So at the species level it is estimated that 99.9% of all species to ever exist are extinct. So at that level we're constantly shrinking and never adding if evolution is not possible.
re: Loomer does not hold anything back
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 8:50 pm to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
And I don’t ever recall seeing you rush on a thread to white knight for MTG before she was no longer loyal to Trump.
That partisan stuff cuts both ways it would seem.
I'm not white knighting for her now either
She always seemed like a bit of a fraud to me and a crazy person
re: Bowl games are like quantitative easing......
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 8:42 pm to bamacoullion
The playoff consuming all of the good teams is the issue
Call me crazy but I don't think making homosexuality illegal will get you much political support
quote:
Yes. Adaptation and selective breeding; not the evolution of new species.
The problem is to believe that things don't evolve you would have to believe that there were vastly many more species at some point in time and we're just constantly shrinking from a starting point number somewhere.
quote:
I did. I never liked the bitch from the moment I heard she was openly cheating on her husband with her gym trainer.
Same for Boebert. I don't like that bitch either and she is still loyal to Trump. I think Boebert is a frickin bimbo who is too stupid to hold office.
Well at least we have some honest people around here :cheers:
quote:
You can fact check all of those & they are all true.
Yet no one gave a shite about any of her character flaws until she wasn't loyal to Trump
She's just a worthless suck up
Not hard to see why you identify with her
Not hard to see why you identify with her
re: The US government has to much money.
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 9:55 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
How to make the people understand the federal government is not the solution, the federal government is the problem?
I would say you have a fundamental misunderstanding if this is your belief
re: Trump has done a great job with his number one promise
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 8:43 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
I’d like to see that go into the negatives.
You might want to look at the graph again buddy. You can't have a negative amount of encounters :lol:
re: Anyone here ever not filed their taxes?
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 8:05 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Not everybody is a W2 employee.
Sure
But I don't know his specific tax situation since he didn't mention it
If he owes money that's his problem
re: Anyone here ever not filed their taxes?
Posted by Powerman on 12/30/25 at 7:12 am to muttenstein
Your taxes are already being withheld. Not filing isn't going to do you any favors.
Of course
I'm questioning the magnitude that he is saying here
If we have that much fraud it's a very serious issue
I'm questioning the magnitude that he is saying here
If we have that much fraud it's a very serious issue
re: Elon Musk: Annual fraud of US Taxpayer $ is an estimated lower bound of $1.5 Trillion +
Posted by Powerman on 12/29/25 at 2:20 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
No one has the political, ethical, or moral will to do this.
Eventually they won't have a choice
re: Elon Musk: Annual fraud of US Taxpayer $ is an estimated lower bound of $1.5 Trillion +
Posted by Powerman on 12/29/25 at 2:11 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
I agree. I actually don’t want to believe it is that much. That would mean that they are not just terrible stewards, but retarded-willingly-blind stewards.
It would mean that almost the entirety of deficit spending was fraud
Or put another way if the fraud was of this magnitude, our budget deficit would be small enough to where we might actually have a shot at balancing the budget
quote:
So it essentially becomes an argument as to whether the aid is justified.
Spending that we don't like isn't fraud though of course
re: Elon Musk: Annual fraud of US Taxpayer $ is an estimated lower bound of $1.5 Trillion +
Posted by Powerman on 12/29/25 at 1:20 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
People are actually disputing/arguing that the person is wrong about the amount of fraud, not the fact that are 100’s of billions in fraud. It is amazing, yes?
Is the 214 billion actually fraud though? Or just deemed unnecessary?
Popular
1












