Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:268
Registered on:8/13/2017
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
He could get more if he took the $30m settlement. Let's assume he finds another job making $5m per year (which is reasonable in today's market) on a 6-year contract. That's $30m from a new employer.

If he takes that job without accepting LSU's offer, the $30m in new salary gets deducted from the $54m that LSU owes him. He still nets $54m ($30m from new employer, and $24m from LSU).

If he takes that job after accepting the $30m offer from LSU, he gets $60m ($30m from new employer and $30m from LSU).

Therefore, a $5m per year job is likely the decision threshold between accepting or declining the LSU offer. Below that, decline; above that, accept.

His declining likely means either a) he doesn't intend on coaching at a top-end school or b) he's going into broadcasting.
quote:

If he doesn’t want to work, there’s plenty of opportunity for him to do the bare minimum and keep collecting his paycheck.


Then he'd be setting himself up for a huge lawsuit for violating the terms of his contract. LSU would certainly be willing to pay the legal costs of that fight in order to avoid the costs of the buyout.
quote:

If someone owed you 50 million would you just puss out and say ok I will take half of what I am owed?


You don't seem to understand the contract and the incentives that the buyout creates. The contract contains a follow-on job provision that mitigates any payout from LSU. If Kelly gets a new job, his LSU buyout is reduced dollar for dollar based on his new salary. The $30m offer is a way for both to financial benefit by LSU getting a lower buyout and Brian Kelly getting to pocket both his new salary and the $30m LSU buyout. He can't accept the $54m from LSU and pocket all the salary from a new job. If he rejects the deal, then he'll be reducing his LSU buyout by every dollar he earns in a new job. Given his background and his success, I suspect he'll have no problem finding a good job. If I were him, I'd jump at the $30m offer and take a new job. That makes the most financial sense. The only way the $54m makes sense is if he plans to fully retire and not work, and I've heard the contract requires him to look for work.

re: Why Saban may want to return

Posted by kbroom on 11/2/25 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I’m not the dumb arse wishcasting on a public forum about a man in his 70’s becoming coach for a second time at a program that’s in shambles.


What a Debbie Downer perspective. The LSU program isn't "in shambles". Far from it. The team has talent and money, and has been competitive over the last four years. It was in shambles after the Archer years (poor recruiting), the Hallman years (poor coaching), and the Dinardo years (poor coaching). LSU isn't anywhere near that same place. LSU just needs the right coach to get us back over the hump to being a championship contender.
quote:

quote:
Saban and Miles came here at very similar points in their careers.


I think Michigan State and Oklahoma State football is on a higher level than Tulane football. Even if only for the competition they play.


Saban and Miles both also had NFL coaching experience. Sumrall doesn't.
I was happy when Saban was hired. I had followed him at MSU and knew he was a good coach (but I'll admit that I didn't think he'd be an elite coach) who could help turn us around. I was skeptical about Miles and was very worried when we hired Orgeron.
quote:

Spoken like a true fairweather fan. We will not miss you.


Some fans get so wrapped up in LSU football's success (or lack thereof), that when the primary goals are out of reach (NC, SEC title, etc.), it's a relief to not be all consumed with LSU football. There's nothing wrong with that, and it's not indicative of being a bandwagon fan. It's just that when LSU turns mediocre, you have to focus on the future (where there is promise) rather than the present (where there is frustration). That doesn't make anyone else less of a fan. Judge yourself, not others.
I liked him until I met him. After that, I couldn't stand the guy. I met him when he was doing a speaking tour over in Europe. I was stationed in Germany and heard him speak at my base (kaserne). That was the same trip when he met Shaq at another nearby kaserne. I spoke with him briefly after the speaking engagement, and never liked the guy after that. He was completely dismissive to me and other troops who were there.
quote:

quote:
I prefer this throw:
2013 SEC Tournament Final


I love that throw too, but it is not in the same universe as Bo’s throw.



Bo isn't an LSU Tiger, so it isn't meaningful at all to me.
quote:

If he can stack on a couple more awards and a World Series I think he’s in HOF


He already has two World Series rings. I suspect he is good there.
MM needs to go. He hasn't earned that type of investment. Let a new guy come in with that kind of backing. MM's teams initially stagnated, and then have regressed.
He needs to go. It has been three years now and I'm not seeing any signs of progressing towards being a competitive team. I'm actually seeing signs of regression. Simply put, our team is less than mediocre.
Freeman was a "continuity hire". It was a gamble that worked out for ND. It's not that much different than the gamble LSU took with hiring Mike Archer, which didn't work out.

re: What does Nuss do for the bowl

Posted by kbroom on 12/19/24 at 5:56 am to
quote:

He's not getting "paid to play"


While you may have a semantic legal argument, the reality is that he is indeed getting paid to play. The bottom line is that if he wasn't a player, he wouldn't be getting paid. Regular students don't get NIL money.

re: UW should hire Pete Carroll

Posted by kbroom on 1/13/24 at 5:20 am to
quote:

How old was john Robinson and bill walsh when they went back to college to finish off their careers ?


Neither were successful in their returns. UW should not use them as a model of success.
quote:

Bill won with Brady and defense in the weakest division in football for 20 years


Divisions are meaningless once the playoffs start.
quote:

The two best coaches in my lifetime across all sports at all levels are Nick Saban and Phil Jackson.


I agree on Phil Jackson. I disagree on Saban.

I'll agree that Saban is the greatest college football coach of all time, but the NFL is where the big boys go to prove themselves, and Saban couldn't hack it at that level. The NFL is designed for parity. When your team is great, you get the worst draft choices and the hardest schedule. When your team sucks, you get the best draft choices and the easiest schedule. It's not like college where you can stockpile talent and maintain an advantage for an extended period of time. Saban quickly realized this and immediately went back to a level where he could sustain success.

I think Belichik is the better coach. He won all those Super Bowls despite all the structural obstacles designed to bring the top teams back to the pack.