HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay

quote:

---

how much per acre?

---

Their asking price is $3500 per. I'm thinking more like $2K per . So now we do the dance.

quote:

---

I don't think you're following this conversation very well.

---

One of us isn't , that's for sure

quote:

---

There is absolutely zero precedent for taking voter rights away permanently

---

Of course there is, felons, for example, can't vote. Are you really suggesting that a government that can remove a right for one reason can't do so for other reasons?

Let's use gun ownership a an example. That's an enumerated right, can't be argued, Americans have the right to own guns. Yet that right can be restricted for a variety of reasons....... How is this possible , I mean you just told us rights can't be taken away.............

quote:

---

If you were insinuating that the right for women to vote and black people to vote being granted gives you precedent to take something away, you would be incorrect.

---

I didn't insinuate that, you inferred it. What I DID say was that a document that can give rights can also remove rights. The COTUS has been used to give voting rights to people, so obviously it can be used to remove those rights.

I mean in theory , Americans could vote on an Amendment reconstituting slavery and if passed that would be the law of the land. THat's how our Constitution works. The majority literally CAN take away rights from the minority. Well, it would require a super majority, but you get the point.

quote:

---

Just to get back to your limiting of voting.... what exactly are your parameters that you are suggesting?

---

Oh nothing extreme. How about picking 20 random questions from the current citizenship test and if you can't get 15 of them correct, you don't get to vote?

Surely we could expect our current citizens to know as much as prospective citizens if they want to vote?

And I'll bet 80% of voters couldn't pass such a test. The ones who cared about voting would study and the ones who studied would make better voters.

quote:

---

Just because Republicans get their panties in a wad over the Russia investigation is not a good reason not to do it.

---

Someone should wad up their fist and put it right in your face. You are without question one of the dumbest motherfrickers to post here.

quote:

---

o...and the fricking things kept getting bigger and bigger and you can't even maneuvre around these a-holes in the parking lots and they want to take up 2 car spaces because instead of being a normal person - Johnny Office - has to buy a fricking tank as a commuter car in the hopes one day a year he might get away from the wife to go fishing.

I partly blame the consumer - who doesn't have cash on hand to buy these things outright - but demanding Chevy build these too big for the road monsters with all the bells and whistles inside.

---

If you wouldn't come rolling in in your $1000 piece of shite and slam the door into my $80K truck, maybe I wouldn't feel the need to park in the middle of two spaces.

quote:

---

Because there is a big difference in aspects of the Constitution changing and taking away the ability to have a true representation voting for those changes.

---

No there isn't. In fact the COTUS has changed over the years to give more people the vote than the founding fathers originally intended, so we KNOW that who can and can't vote can be changed via the COTUS.

In point of fact until the 15th Amendment voting in this country was NOT a right. The 15th Amendment is the very first mention of the right to vote you will find in the COTUS.

If you want to disagree about taking away the automatic right to vote, that's a fair discussion, but saying "the right to vote is fundamental to this country and can't be changed" is wrong, because originally every adult did NOT have the right to vote, and the COTUS was amended to allow it.

quote:

---

His older brother has a lab. Hes not impressed

---

Da fuq? Labs are probably the best all around dog there is. We just got another one, a sweet little chocolate, we named him Snickers.

quote:

---

All of them are criminals. They're entering the country illegally.

---

False, illegally entering both the US AND Mexico is not a crime. It's a civil offense. A completely different matter.

Not being factual should be a crime.

quote:

---

LLOTOT - "OMG, you have acquired so much land! I want your tiny weiner!" ...

---

I'm a married man and thus will leave the lovely ladies of the OT to their own devices.

quote:

---

Cool. Can I go hunting on your property now?

---

I currently have 300 acres, 50 of it is pretty wooded, pretty good spot for deer and turkey I don't personally hunt, but the guys I do let hunt in there always come back with meat.

quote:

---

I hope the Indians and government comes in and steals the property from you.

---

The government steals from me every year when property taxes are due .