BaylorTiger

DUDE! I hope this is true (not really), you are about to win a MAJOR law suit if you play this right...GL TO YOU.

quote:

---

A State Department spokeswoman declined to comment but noted that Pompeo said after his talks in Pyongyang last week that the date for the meeting remained flexible. Just before departing Pyongyang, Pompeo said that the meeting was set for Thursday but that it “could move by one day or two.”

---

quote:

---

It was not clear why North Korean officials did not attend the meeting Thursday or whether they had confirmed their intention to.

---

:lol: :lol:

Another fail thread...did you even read the article?

quote:

---

So we would never have fewer troops, or spend less money in Europe if all the NATO countries stepped up and paid what they agreed?

---

Here's where you find the shallowness of their intellectual pool. They didn't quite make it this far in their logical progression or, more likely, their talking points stopped here.

If Germany, and for conversation sake, and all of our other allies spent as much as the US on defense, would the US feel the need to spend as much?

It's a really good question. I have an opinion but not a well vetted, informed answer. My opinion is no, the US would not spend as much if everyone else spent more.

I'm willing to hear why not...but I doubt they come here and address this...because they can't.

quote:

---

TBoy

---

Interesting, so you're saying that if the rest of our allies spent more money on defense it would in no way impact our level of spending?

Would love to read more about this, do you have a link or any sort of supporting evidence or are you just totally full of %#*@?

quote:

---

There are a couple of plea agreements obtained by Mueller that do not include these cooperation provisions.

---

Patently false. They all have a version of it. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

Little advice since you clearly, again, DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS, look for the words obligation and "breach" if your half baked CTRL + F search is letting you down on the word "cooperation".

quote:

---

Remind Me

---

You were basically running around saying the SC has jurisdiction to investigate anything, anywhere that occurred at any time.

You linked the exact statue I would of linked but you cherry picked a sentence in the middle of a paragraph and tried to use it to prove your grossly ill informed "point" without trying to, or maybe completely unable to, use any context like...I dunno...the surrounding sentences.

quote:

---

Flynn is still cooperating.

---

:lol:

quote:

---

There are cooperation provisions in his plea agreement you can read if you want to know the parameters. It’s on the Special Counsel DOJ web page.

---

:lol:

How many plea agreements have you read? Please tell me how many of those agreements DID NOT include this.

I love when you try and cite things you don't have the knowledge, background and flat out pedigree to understand and layer your inadequate, unqualified level of understanding on top of it.

I think we had this same argument when you tried to outline the scope of the special council and in your attempt to twist the statute to your view you left out the single most important, defining sentence in the entire paragraph.


:lol:

It's definitely been confirmed. Several different sources.


Edit: The person arguing this, the points of contigency you are using to try and refute this are beyond idiotic and illogical.

I once saw a grown lady beg Phil Michelson for a ball at
a tournament once.


Held out her hand and said "Phil wouldn't you like to give that ball away" which he promptly replied, "You're right I would" and he handed it to a kid on the other side of the walk-way.

I became a Phil Michelson fan after that for life, screw what they say about the gambling, insider trading, blow and hkrs...he's ok with me!

Literally...what in the actual fck are you talking about?

I've never said this before, and I'm not a huge fan of it, but this is textbook melt.

WOW that poll is so slanted it's almost worthless.

Slanted towards democrats, not even remotely close to an accurate representation.