BookSack

Came with Battlefield 1. What is the second game that I should buy?

Shooters and Sport related games mainly interest me.

quote:

---

He was used to test the #1 defense in a Lamar Jackson role

---

Looks like he did Lamar better than Lamar himself :lol:

He's on the roster

(No Message)

Well I mean as long as we're judging coaches by their bowl performance we might as well say Tom Herman was a horrible hire by Texas.

quote:

---

Remember when he was going to be the GOAT?

---

Statistically, he never ended up being the statistical GOAT. But we consider him to be at least average because he had the speed, elusiveness, and strength to do stuff like this:



And this:



And this:



And this:



I would show you more, but your trailer park WiFi router would short circuit and burst into flames because there are so many gifs of Fournette making defenders look silly.

He also played 90% of his career under the moronic and senseless coach that looked like this:





And he did something spectacular in every game except for when he met this:



And hurt this:

(No Message)

I honestly would choose Harris just because of his experience in the SEC. But if Narcisse comes in against a team like Mississippi State and puts up better numbers, he deserves a shot. Narcisse's prone to injury is also put into consideration.
Tua should be thrown in the mix if he commits somehow.
Linsey Scott is a great descision maker and is built like a truck. His best shot is to basicaly do the same thing as I said above with Narcisse.

Yes he is. He is the best DT Quarterback recruit in the country according to the ESPN 300.

Recently, the two most popular candidates for LSU on this bird have been Lane Kiffen and Art Briles. I made a comparison of the two and thought I would share.

Art Briles, whether you like it or not, has revolutionized the college spread offence. He does not use a play book (uses a numbering system). This allows him to run the offense as fast as he wishes; up to 11 seconds between snaps. The most common thing and individual would do is look at Baylor hang 70 points on TCU and say "Well, doesn't he throw %90 of the time?". His play call ratio is actually about %75 percent run/play action. Quarterback wise, the most impressive thing I have seen him do is put Jared Stidham after Seth Russel was injured, and have equal success.

Game plan wise, many of his concepts consist of a mix of multiple principals. He mixed his passing game with a pro style attack and plays that consists of a cover 3 and cover 2 beater. His run game combines mostly inside zone, outside zones, and zone reads. I did like when he still hung a significant amount of points on Oklahoma even though he was dominated on the line of scrimmage.

Art's obvious cons are the allegations that he had at Baylor, as well as his inexperience in the SEC.

Lane Kiffen on the other hand has done an excellent job on doing well with the playmakers he has. His ability to change his philosophy based on the talent he has is excellent. When he arrived, he looked at the playmakers that he had. He had Blake Sims (A dual threat quarterback), and Amari Cooper. So, He designed a spread offence based off of these two players. Then in 2015 he saw that he had Jacob Coker (An pro style quarterback, game manager) and Derrick Henry (A big and physical back that won the heisman). So he created a pro style passing attack with a smash mouth run game. This year is another spread based on using Jalen Hurts as a passing and running threat.

The cons to Lane Kiffin are that he has been notorious to have discipline issues. He also has a good chance of going to a low tier university as a head coach.