Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:25258
Registered on:11/1/2016
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Her rhetoric is apocalyptic, claiming the order sent “chills down her spine”


:lol:

This is what SFP is defending.
quote:

Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie


Yes, the EO is the focus of this thread as well.
quote:

yes but that wasn't a focus of the ruling.


But it was part of the focus of the EO.
quote:

No dude, it's this thread. You chose to discuss something different, which mirrors the activist judge position. Maybe you could stop being the arbiter of who is keeping the discussion focused, you suck at it.


He does this constantly. If he has 3 or more posts in a thread that's a sign he feels he can derail the conversation.
quote:

No I'm discussing the case at the center of OP.



The case about the EO that mentioned unethical behavior in its language?

You're saying the claim that whether or not Perkins Coie acted unethical is not relevant to that case?
quote:

No dude, it's this thread. You chose to discuss something different, which mirrors the activist judge position. Maybe you could stop being the arbiter of who is keeping the discussion focused, you suck at it.


100% chance of a "pivot" retort. Brace yourself.
quote:

Not in terms of the law, EO, or court ruling at issue.

Like I said, you'd need a new thread and EO to have that discussion


The EO said security clearances were being pulled because of viewpoint differences?
quote:

He didn't have a point.


:lol: You just said you did address his point, now he doesn't have one. Which is it?
quote:

That's an entirely different discussion


Nope, it's a realistic alternative to viewpoint differences.
quote:

Flailing, irrelevant!


90% chance of a "pivot" incoming.
quote:

I did


Saying he's flailing then talking about what Trump could have done isn't addressing his point.
quote:

Correct.


Why can't this be about unethical behavior instead of viewpoint differences?
quote:

If you want some irony


I suspect he'd rather you address his point rather than handwave.
quote:

So everyone is guilty except the team with the security clearances and paying for shite. Sweet there are some Mob guys that would love that defense.


:lol:

This has to be his stance, he's put so much stock in "there's no such thing as lawfare".
quote:

Sure. That's literally irrelevant, though.


With respect to whether or not this about viewpoint differences?
quote:

By Steele. Not Perkins Coie.


Perkins Coie was still aware, though.
quote:

It was. i think you meant to include the "by a campaign" language and forgot.


And Perkins Coie just forgot that the knowimgly false report they had a hand in creating was being used in courts/investigations, huh?
I haven't found a satisfactory definition of viewpoint discrimination, therefore it doesn't exist.

Am I doing it correctly?
quote:

I saw it during the campaign. Hell I think I may have shared it on social media during the campaign.


"It was reported on during a campaign therefore it's 100% a political advertisement."

quote:

Dude. Just stop


With wrinkles your comparisons can't properly account for?

No, I don't think I will.