Primeminister337

I have no doubt Armstrong self then Mcneese kid our way, and would bet Wade was recruiting him before he left Mcneese. That would be a huge piece for our generals return.

Nah if he had reed we would have only won 1 NC cause he would have left as the number 1 pick in the draft after his first one lmao!

Good coaches do have the possibility to make the tournament in year one and of they don’t, they at least leave you with the feeling that it’s comming next year. As a fan of the sport and LSU , you recognize right away if ya got the right guy for the job regardless of year one in my opinion. The writing is usually on the wall. A feeling most of us never truley felt with Mcman.

I thought Mcman developed all these players? Once Reed goes number 1 in the draft the haters will see lol

I hear what your saying my man and always respect what bring to the table ATL. But most coaches, especially when trying to fins the new age ones are long shots until someone gives them a chance and heck maybe I could be wrong on Braeur. And it’s kinda out of character for me for me to push this hard for a guy cause I’m usually the first question any hire but I feel like at the price we would have to pay for him, combined with our current situation he’s worth the gamble.as far as their strength of schedule, yeah I get it, but winning that many games at any school regardless of schedule is not easy. One key thing I look for in a coaching prospect is if they are able to rip off 9-10 games in a row. Cause come March, if we ever want to dream about maybe a final four on the future you gotta have a coach that can win 5 games just to get into that position in the tourney. That’s just my opinion and to each his own, I just feel like it’s great value considering the state of our program right now. Also, one thing I didn’t add was when it comes to locking the right coach you gotta consider style of play. Unlike Macman he’s already building his identity. Tough nose defense which in a style that adapts very well to the SEC. A lot of guys in this board throw out names cause of success a coach is having but don’t take into consideration if his style of play fits our conference and style of player fits our region. Style of play and regional fit are major factors, it’s kinda like taking a high profile PAC 12 coach and putting him in the SEC , it just doesn’t work out sometimes

Kinda off subject, but when it comes to spending NIL, first priority should be getting the PG at Mcneese, I can promise you he’s gonna be on the list of quite a few teams, Kid can flat out play

Gonna be hard for SFA to beat Mcneese in lake Charles tonight, either way ya can’t overlook the job he did at SFA this year. That being said, Armstrong has done a hell of a job too. I just lean more toward Matt because of his age and who he’s learned under

Matt Braeuer

Our lack of production is completely mental. We just need a couple guys to get hot because hitting is contagious, once that happens everyone will follow suit

ATL, I know not a lot of people on this board know about him, but he’s starting to turn heads in the coaching world, your good at researching, check out the coaches he’s been under and what he’s accomplishing right now. Matt Brauer

LINK