Tigershine

Lester Earl, do you get paid by how many downvotes you accumulate. Because you sure seem todo your best to put out stupid bs and hoard them. If this true, how does one go about getting this gig?

That may all be true, but the fact remain McMahon's name was brought into the thread, needlessly, and once again starting the derailing of a recruiting thread. All after your apology and promise to not do this again. Pardon me while I think the apology and promise were insincere.

So once again we have a basketball recruiting thread and the usual cast of characters have jumped immediately jumped in to ruin it. Mind you, this is AFTER apologizing and promising to cut it out. Sigh.... :banghead:

Yes, a thread that made no mention of Wade or McMahon was steere that way as soon as these douches saw the chance. So damn infuriating.

Yes there are pro Wade and anti Wade, as well as pro McM and anti McM people in this thread and it's so damn frustrating. What people come here for and have beg en begging for is an we please limit this thread to actual hs and portal recruiting news. The pro and anti forces can then carry their debate to their own thread and cease gummying up every other mbb thread. That would improve the TD experience tremendously. That is all.

Does anyone believe these annoying SOBs will ever give up this juvenile pissing match? Or maybe it's actually their jobs, working for Ruined Threads Are Us? or maybe Really Annoying MFers and WE Really Don't Care?

Possibly Charley Joiner goes in that top 5 somewhere before Thomas

Billy Truax, and Roland Barbay from Holy Cross, New Orleans

Palmer over Austin for sure

with all those WRs, is there anyone who also has prior experience at CB

Yes I DO understand what you're saying. I too was looking forward to seeing Tyson today and this season but the injury doesn't totally discount the pick though it is dampened a bit. The fact is , unless we truly expected the Saints to make a real run for the Super Bowl, it can still be a good pick and that's what I'm holding out for.

perhaps it is a bad take but my point still holds. People are not willing or able to look beyond the immediate.

Whether or not it's a bad take won't be known for a few years.