Rhino67
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 809 |
| Registered on: | 11/27/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
How would you react if Kiffin were suspended?
Posted by Rhino67 on 9/9/26 at 11:45 am
Would your reaction be different if he were suspended for three games versus the whole season?
More importantly, how do you think LSU would react?
More importantly, how do you think LSU would react?
37
Let the men handle what? A shitshow of complaining, emotional accusations, gossip, lawsuits, he said she said, they did we didn’t??? This whole CFB environment, and this board, sounds more like a bunch of women to me.
quote:
College football is now everything that is great about America: Violence Committee meetings between decision-makers Lawsuits
For real. :lol:
Before money ruined amateurism, watching sports, particularly college football, for me had been a needed break from news and politics. Now college football has more news and politics in it than actual news and politics. It’s disgusting. When the trout and redfish start making political statements, I think I’ll be done with life.
Anyone else just exhausted by all this?
Posted by Rhino67 on 9/3/26 at 4:10 pm
My interest in college football is at an all time low. Anyone else gonna take more fall weekend fishing trips this season? I’m completely disgusted by what college football has become.
I’m an Uber driver and plan on working for the game. Getting there shouldn’t be too hard, but leave early. Leaving the game, you’ll be walking a long ways…or staying put in one spot near the stadium for hours.
LSU is just begging to get kicked out of the SEC
Posted by Rhino67 on 8/28/26 at 8:44 am
re: Jayden Daniels sends cease-and-desist to LSU after Pickett given No. 5
Posted by Rhino67 on 8/12/26 at 11:46 pm to TexasTiger_08
Don’t y’all love the new college football?
Salary filler? You could have just said Jordan Poole.
Fair point. If we're talking about the Pelicans' current roster construction, mentioning "salary filler" without naming likely contracts is vague.
In a hypothetical Pelicans–Celtics framework for Jaylen Brown, a player like Jordan Poole could be used to help match salaries if he were on New Orleans' roster at the time of the trade. Other contracts could also be involved depending on the exact cap situation and league rules in effect.
That said, my main point wasn't really about which contract gets included. It was that I wouldn't want New Orleans to pay all three of these costs simultaneously:
Dejounte Murray
Trey Murphy III
Multiple first-round picks
for Jaylen Brown.
If the trade is essentially:
Murray + Poole + picks ? Brown
then I'd be much more interested.
If it's:
Murray + Murphy + Poole + multiple firsts ? Brown
then I think New Orleans is overpaying.
The reason is that Murphy isn't just a throw-in. He's one of the league's better young 3-and-D wings, fits perfectly next to Zion Williamson, and is entering his prime. Replacing Murphy's shooting and versatility could be harder than people realize, even if Brown is the superior overall player.
Fair point. If we're talking about the Pelicans' current roster construction, mentioning "salary filler" without naming likely contracts is vague.
In a hypothetical Pelicans–Celtics framework for Jaylen Brown, a player like Jordan Poole could be used to help match salaries if he were on New Orleans' roster at the time of the trade. Other contracts could also be involved depending on the exact cap situation and league rules in effect.
That said, my main point wasn't really about which contract gets included. It was that I wouldn't want New Orleans to pay all three of these costs simultaneously:
Dejounte Murray
Trey Murphy III
Multiple first-round picks
for Jaylen Brown.
If the trade is essentially:
Murray + Poole + picks ? Brown
then I'd be much more interested.
If it's:
Murray + Murphy + Poole + multiple firsts ? Brown
then I think New Orleans is overpaying.
The reason is that Murphy isn't just a throw-in. He's one of the league's better young 3-and-D wings, fits perfectly next to Zion Williamson, and is entering his prime. Replacing Murphy's shooting and versatility could be harder than people realize, even if Brown is the superior overall player.
What about trading Dejounte Murray, Trey Murphy, and multiple first round picks for Jaylen Brown?
If the deal is Dejounte Murray + Trey Murphy III + multiple first-round picks for Jaylen Brown, my reaction as a Pelicans fan would be: probably no.
Here's why.
Why Jaylen Brown is great
Jaylen Brown is the better player today. He's a proven championship-caliber two-way wing, a multiple-time All-Star, and can be the second-best player on a title team. Recent reports indicate New Orleans has at least explored the possibility of acquiring him.
Why the cost worries me
The problem is that you're not just trading Murray.
You're giving up:
* Trey Murphy III
* Dejounte Murray
* Multiple first-round picks
Murphy is only 26, shoots at a high level, defends multiple positions, and fits almost any roster. Around the league, he's viewed as one of New Orleans' most valuable assets and a foundational piece.
The question becomes:
How much better is Brown than Murphy over the next 4–5 years?
My answer: better, but not "Murphy + picks" better.
The roster fit
If you make the trade, you could end up with:
* Zion Williamson
* Jaylen Brown
* Herb Jones
* Young players such as Jeremiah Fears and Derik Queen
That's a talented group, but you've also:
* Lost your best shooter (Murphy)
* Lost future draft flexibility
* Taken on Brown's massive contract
* Still not solved the center problem
Many Pelicans observers have argued that center and overall roster balance are bigger needs than another high-usage wing.
A version I'd consider
I would be much more interested in:
Murray + salary filler + 1–2 picks for Brown
or
Murphy + Murray for Brown with little or no additional draft compensation
But if Boston is demanding Murphy, Murray, and multiple firsts, New Orleans is probably paying a superstar price for a player who, while excellent, isn't quite in the tier of someone like Giannis Antetokounmpo.
My verdict
For the Celtics: I'd seriously consider it. Murphy is exactly the kind of young two-way wing teams covet, and the picks add flexibility.
For the Pelicans: I'd pass unless the draft compensation is minimal. Murphy's age, contract, shooting, and fit next to Zion make him almost as valuable to New Orleans as Brown is, and the extra picks could end up being the difference between a contender and a team that tops out in the middle of the Western Conference.
A trade I would prefer is using Murray and picks to acquire a high-level center while keeping Murphy. That improves the roster balance without sacrificing one of the team's best long-term assets.
If the deal is Dejounte Murray + Trey Murphy III + multiple first-round picks for Jaylen Brown, my reaction as a Pelicans fan would be: probably no.
Here's why.
Why Jaylen Brown is great
Jaylen Brown is the better player today. He's a proven championship-caliber two-way wing, a multiple-time All-Star, and can be the second-best player on a title team. Recent reports indicate New Orleans has at least explored the possibility of acquiring him.
Why the cost worries me
The problem is that you're not just trading Murray.
You're giving up:
* Trey Murphy III
* Dejounte Murray
* Multiple first-round picks
Murphy is only 26, shoots at a high level, defends multiple positions, and fits almost any roster. Around the league, he's viewed as one of New Orleans' most valuable assets and a foundational piece.
The question becomes:
How much better is Brown than Murphy over the next 4–5 years?
My answer: better, but not "Murphy + picks" better.
The roster fit
If you make the trade, you could end up with:
* Zion Williamson
* Jaylen Brown
* Herb Jones
* Young players such as Jeremiah Fears and Derik Queen
That's a talented group, but you've also:
* Lost your best shooter (Murphy)
* Lost future draft flexibility
* Taken on Brown's massive contract
* Still not solved the center problem
Many Pelicans observers have argued that center and overall roster balance are bigger needs than another high-usage wing.
A version I'd consider
I would be much more interested in:
Murray + salary filler + 1–2 picks for Brown
or
Murphy + Murray for Brown with little or no additional draft compensation
But if Boston is demanding Murphy, Murray, and multiple firsts, New Orleans is probably paying a superstar price for a player who, while excellent, isn't quite in the tier of someone like Giannis Antetokounmpo.
My verdict
For the Celtics: I'd seriously consider it. Murphy is exactly the kind of young two-way wing teams covet, and the picks add flexibility.
For the Pelicans: I'd pass unless the draft compensation is minimal. Murphy's age, contract, shooting, and fit next to Zion make him almost as valuable to New Orleans as Brown is, and the extra picks could end up being the difference between a contender and a team that tops out in the middle of the Western Conference.
A trade I would prefer is using Murray and picks to acquire a high-level center while keeping Murphy. That improves the roster balance without sacrificing one of the team's best long-term assets.
How can the Pelicans make their team better? ChatGPT weighs in.
Posted by Rhino67 on 6/5/26 at 11:51 pm
The Pelicans' biggest problem isn't star power — it's roster construction, health, and defense.
After finishing 26–56 with one of the league's weaker defenses, the organization appears headed for another significant offseason under executive vice president Joe Dumars and new coach Jamahl Mosley.
1. Build a real defensive identity
New Orleans ranked near the bottom of the NBA defensively, allowing 120 points per game and posting a bottom-tier defensive rating.
Mosley earned a reputation in Orlando for defense and player development, so the Pelicans should lean into that.
A starting-caliber rim-protecting center would help tremendously. Several analysts have identified center as the roster's most obvious weakness.
2. Keep the Zion–Trey Murphy core
Unless an overwhelming offer appears, I'd keep:
* Zion Williamson
* Trey Murphy III
* Herb Jones
* Jeremiah Fears
* Derik Queen
Reports indicate the Pelicans have already resisted trading much of that young core.
Murphy, in particular, looks like the ideal modern two-way wing to build around.
3. Decide what Zion's future really is
This is the franchise-defining question.
When healthy, Zion is still an All-NBA-level offensive force. The problem is availability. Since entering the league, injuries have repeatedly disrupted both his development and the team's continuity. ([New York Post][4])
The Pelicans have two paths:
**Path A:** Fully commit to Zion and build a roster that maximizes his strengths:
* Shooting at every position
* Rim protection behind him
* Fast-paced offense
**Path B:** If they believe his health will never stabilize, trade him while his value remains significant and pivot around Murphy, Fears, Queen, and future assets.
Given recent reporting, the front office appears closer to Path A.
4. Add more shooting
The Pelicans have often surrounded Zion with lineups that lack enough perimeter shooting.
To maximize Zion's downhill attacks, they need:
* Reliable catch-and-shoot wings
* Stretch bigs
* Bench scoring
Spacing has been a recurring issue throughout the Zion era.
5. Be patient with the young players
The most encouraging part of the roster may be the youth.
Players such as:
* Jeremiah Fears
* Derik Queen
* Yves Missi
could become foundational pieces if developed properly. Mosley's reputation for player development is one reason the hire makes sense.
What I would do
If I were running the team:
1. Keep Zion for one more season.
2. Keep Trey Murphy untouchable.
3. Acquire a defensive center.
4. Add shooting around Zion.
5. Let Mosley develop Fears, Queen, and Missi.
6. Reevaluate Zion's future at the 2027 trade deadline if the team is still outside playoff contention.
That path gives New Orleans a chance to compete while avoiding a full rebuild. The Western Conference is too strong for half-measures, but the Pelicans still have enough talent that a smart retool is more sensible than tearing everything down.
After finishing 26–56 with one of the league's weaker defenses, the organization appears headed for another significant offseason under executive vice president Joe Dumars and new coach Jamahl Mosley.
1. Build a real defensive identity
New Orleans ranked near the bottom of the NBA defensively, allowing 120 points per game and posting a bottom-tier defensive rating.
Mosley earned a reputation in Orlando for defense and player development, so the Pelicans should lean into that.
A starting-caliber rim-protecting center would help tremendously. Several analysts have identified center as the roster's most obvious weakness.
2. Keep the Zion–Trey Murphy core
Unless an overwhelming offer appears, I'd keep:
* Zion Williamson
* Trey Murphy III
* Herb Jones
* Jeremiah Fears
* Derik Queen
Reports indicate the Pelicans have already resisted trading much of that young core.
Murphy, in particular, looks like the ideal modern two-way wing to build around.
3. Decide what Zion's future really is
This is the franchise-defining question.
When healthy, Zion is still an All-NBA-level offensive force. The problem is availability. Since entering the league, injuries have repeatedly disrupted both his development and the team's continuity. ([New York Post][4])
The Pelicans have two paths:
**Path A:** Fully commit to Zion and build a roster that maximizes his strengths:
* Shooting at every position
* Rim protection behind him
* Fast-paced offense
**Path B:** If they believe his health will never stabilize, trade him while his value remains significant and pivot around Murphy, Fears, Queen, and future assets.
Given recent reporting, the front office appears closer to Path A.
4. Add more shooting
The Pelicans have often surrounded Zion with lineups that lack enough perimeter shooting.
To maximize Zion's downhill attacks, they need:
* Reliable catch-and-shoot wings
* Stretch bigs
* Bench scoring
Spacing has been a recurring issue throughout the Zion era.
5. Be patient with the young players
The most encouraging part of the roster may be the youth.
Players such as:
* Jeremiah Fears
* Derik Queen
* Yves Missi
could become foundational pieces if developed properly. Mosley's reputation for player development is one reason the hire makes sense.
What I would do
If I were running the team:
1. Keep Zion for one more season.
2. Keep Trey Murphy untouchable.
3. Acquire a defensive center.
4. Add shooting around Zion.
5. Let Mosley develop Fears, Queen, and Missi.
6. Reevaluate Zion's future at the 2027 trade deadline if the team is still outside playoff contention.
That path gives New Orleans a chance to compete while avoiding a full rebuild. The Western Conference is too strong for half-measures, but the Pelicans still have enough talent that a smart retool is more sensible than tearing everything down.
quote:
He reads this board .
Hey Brian: Go frick Yourself
Nah. He was so lazy he probably didn't even do that.
It is already documented that he hired a PR firm to help him with fan relations.
"Hey Brian, we discovered an LSU fan website named Tigerdroppings. The demographic of this website seems to skew heavily toward young and middle aged white men. They call themselves "baws" and appear to have a particular affinity for the number three hundred fifty. You might want to reference this in discussions in the future."
If the Super Bowl ended right this second, Seattle’s kicker would be the MVP.
Posted by Rhino67 on 2/8/26 at 7:54 pm
Jason Meyers is the only one who’s scored.
That halftime show was better than I thought it would be.
Posted by Rhino67 on 2/8/26 at 7:37 pm
Of course, I’m talking about Bad Bunny. I’m not too familiar with him or his music, but that was a pretty good performance. I’ve always liked Latin culture and music. I was dancing in my living room during some of it.
Way better than watching Kid Rock celebrate pedophilia, I’ll tell you that.
Way better than watching Kid Rock celebrate pedophilia, I’ll tell you that.
If Ole Miss loses tonight, this board will be saying “Thank God that’s over.”
Posted by Rhino67 on 1/8/26 at 6:38 pm
If Ole Miss wins tonight, this board will be saying…..what?
I wonder how LA feels losing a game on a no call pass interference.
Posted by Rhino67 on 12/29/25 at 10:18 pm
Must suck.
LSU will lose by four scores at least.
Defense is playing at half-speed.
Posted by Rhino67 on 12/27/25 at 10:15 pm
It’s clear they don’t care about this game, so why should I? This isn’t a talent discrepancy; it’s simply lack of effort. Houston wants this game more. They’ll win it, and I won’t be surprised if it’s a blowout. Has there ever been a more unlikable LSU football team?
re: How many nattys will we win with Kiffin?
Posted by Rhino67 on 11/30/25 at 12:56 am to LSUGrad9295
None.
He will do marginally better than Brian Kelly did, averaging three losses per season to Kelly’s four. Kiffin won’t do as well here as he has at Ole Miss.
He will do marginally better than Brian Kelly did, averaging three losses per season to Kelly’s four. Kiffin won’t do as well here as he has at Ole Miss.
re: Lane coming or not coming rests on the outcome of the Iron Bowl.
Posted by Rhino67 on 11/29/25 at 9:53 pm to Tigerfan5523
I said this three weeks ago. Is anyone actually surprised that’s it’s happening.gif?
Lane coming or not coming rests on the outcome of the Iron Bowl.
Posted by Rhino67 on 11/29/25 at 9:47 pm
Bama wins, he’s LSU bound.
Aubie wins, he’s staying at Ole Miss and waiting for the Bama job to open up.
Simple as that.
Aubie wins, he’s staying at Ole Miss and waiting for the Bama job to open up.
Simple as that.
re: Everyone root for Bama to beat Auburn next weekend.
Posted by Rhino67 on 11/21/25 at 5:23 pm to WavinWilly
quote:
Their trigger finger isn’t that quick is it?
No one thought we would fire BK when we did.
At Bama, a four loss season followed by a three loss season is cause enough if LSU is a threat to land Lane. Could be why Lane is holding out.
Popular
28
