gr82bAnAUTiger
| Favorite team: | Auburn  |
| Location: | Birmingham AL |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 77 |
| Registered on: | 9/17/2006 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 4:25 pm to AU03ALUM
quote:
You are missing the point. Auburn is still under investigation.
I guess we're still under as much investigation as bammer is for Julio and Ingram taking a little fishing expedition/cruise with good ole Curtis Anderson. Did the NCAA ever announce that investigation was closed?
No? They just ruled on eligibility? Same thing.
The only difference in this thing is that the NCAA has had to field 100,000 "tips" from delusional conspiracy theory moron Alabama fans.
3
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 4:19 pm to AUnite
quote:
Hasn't the NCAA already done that four times?
I mean no offense to you hun: but have you been living under a rock?
Yes, clearly there's so much evidence piled up against Auburn that our coach calls the NCAA out on hurrying up and finishing their "investigation". All of the facts of the case have been known since last July.
If you honestly believe Auburn is ACTUALLY in any sort of trouble for Cam Newton, then you've listened way to much to the bammers over here.
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 4:15 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
The entire point of my post was that some of you barner fricks think that milty getting off today is the end of your NCAA troubles. I never said I believed it and have said many times on this board that I will believe the shite when I see it anyway.
If you want to flame someone for being an ATPB'er, you need to find someone else because there are plenty of people here that will tell you you are barking up the wrong fricking tree.
Milty has nothing to do with Auburn's "NCAA troubles" and never has. The fact that you think WE think they are linked is pretty telling and shows a total lack of ability to piece together a coherent thought on your part.
Keep running your mouth all you like, but it's clear you are a fool regardless of your affiliation with "ATPB" or whatever other fantasy land conspiracy theory your fan base has come up with over the last 9 months.
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 4:09 pm to AUnite
quote:
quote:
I wonder if those ATPB'ers are looking back like a kid who was hooked on WoW.
"I can't believe I wasted months of my life doing that..."
Nope, I bet you money that even if the NCAA cleared AU of any wrongdoing, they'd still be in that thread typing away.
Hasn't the NCAA already done that four times?
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 3:58 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
LOL! You can't possibly be this stupid.
Maybe you missed the part where I said..
quote:
I dont necessarily believe they exist, I'm just saying that that is the ONLY thing this affects in terms of the Auburn investigation.
and
quote:
Just because Milty is getting away with bribing politicians, doesnt mean he is getting away with bribing football players, if in fact he did.
Not sure who you are with your 71 posts but dont come in here talking down to me. I was merely stating that the people talking like this has anything to do with Auburn are kidding themselves.
The fact that you think there's ANY CHANCE WHATSOEVER of any of that total BS Conspiracy theory crap just goes to show you are a complete mental midget that shouldn't be allowed to have a driver's license.
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 3:56 pm to RT1941
quote:
quote:
This has ALL been a huge work of fiction, and Tiger Droppings has allowed this rumor mongering to continue for nearly a year now.
Not one person is forcing you and your 71 posts in 5 yrs, to stay on Tiger Droppings and wallow in the rumor mongering.
I just enjoy making fun of you guys when it's obvious you are FOS. LOL!
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 3:41 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
yeah cause we all know if you ask the FBI for info or prior evidence they just hand it out with no questions asked.
Which is fairly irrelevant considering the conversation they are talking about never even took place.
This has ALL been a huge work of fiction, and Tiger Droppings has allowed this rumor mongering to continue for nearly a year now.
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 3:40 pm to AuburnCPA
(No Message)
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 3:40 pm to RT1941
quote:
I've lived in Mongtomery for a long time, been involved directly with the legal, buisness, and banking systems here for years.
I've witnessed what some men are capable of, and the very idea that men like Milton McGregor and Bobby Lowder are honorable men is a freaking joke.
ATPB be damned - I'm sure it's total coincidence that those men just happen to be AU men.
LOL! You guys are so out of touch with reality that it's not even funny. Just more Alabama Conspiracy theory morons inventing some more fiction.
re: Milton McGregor not guilty on three counts
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 8/11/11 at 3:36 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
Yeah, this has absolutely nothing to do with the Auburn stuff other than the fact that if there are in fact wiretaps that cant be used until this is over with, then it will now be longer before they can be used. I dont necessarily believe they exist, I'm just saying that that is the ONLY thing this affects in terms of the Auburn investigation.
Just because Milty is getting away with bribing politicians, doesnt mean he is getting away with bribing football players, if in fact he did.
LOL! You can't possibly be this stupid.
re: Not looking good for Auburn...
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 7/11/11 at 5:10 pm to UAalumnus
quote:
Apr 27, 2004 - Auburn University - Violatons of recruiting legislation
[NOTE: Undefeated Season]
Nov 18, 1991 - Auburn University - IMPERMISSIBLE RECRUITING:
These two were basketball, not football you moron, and in the 2004 one we were charged with calling Mark Komara (the same AAU coach you guys just got Trevor Lacey from) too many times, which is ridiculous. How many times you think Anthony grant called Komara to recruit Lacey?
The 1980 and 1958 situations were just extensions of the previous year's incidents.
Auburn football has had 3 total investigations, resulting in probation.
1957/1958 - The Don Fuell situation which was a complete Alabama fabrication, where you guys hired a private detective to offer Don money NOT to go to AU, and then tried to dig up dirt on him when he turned you down.
1979/1980 - These were legitimate problems with boosters, no excuses. We were cheating and got caught. The irony was this was during the Barfield years where we were terrible anyways.
1993 - The much publicized Eric Ramsey fiasco orchestrated by Don Watkins and Richard Arrington (with rumored help from Alabama boosters) as payback for Auburn taking the Iron Bowl out of Birmingham. This entire violation was over a LOAN and a BOX OF STEAKS given to a scholarship athlete that BEGGED the head coach for money for food to feed his family while he recorded the conversations.
Was it wrong to help the kid and then try to cover it up? Absolutely, but it was a setup from the word go.
Meanwhile, Auburn's football program has been clean since 1993...
In contrast, since that time, Alabama has THREE MAJOR FOOTBALL violations, and has been labelled as a "serial repeat violator" with the most "extensive recent history of infractions cases unmatched by any other member institution in the NCAA."
re: Cecil Interview
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 7/1/11 at 8:17 am to superman
Did you read the whole article?
If you go back to the article that you're quoting you'll see a completely different take:
Cecil Newton is confident the NCAA will find no other improprieties. "We really just want it to calm down, let the smoke settle, let the dust settle," Newton said Thursday in a rare interview. "The truth is out there. They have it in their files."
"I don't really want to go back and rehash that and speak along the lines of what I did or didn't do, what was said, what should have been said. I really don't even want to open that can of worms... I've been transparent throughout the whole process."
And the reason he answered it that way, is because Cecil never solicited anything from anyone. If you go read the articles where Cecil "admits solicitation", it clearly says he HAD CONVERSATIONS about money with Kenny Rogers. That DOESN'T MEAN that Cecil is the one that asked for money.
https://www.wsbtv.com/sports/25778803/detail.html
"a source close to the situation exclusively told channel 2 action news investigative reporter Mark Winne that the player's father, Cecil Newton, has admitted having conversations with an ex-Mississippi State University player about the possibility of under-the-table money if Cam Newton signed to play football at Mississippi State, though he's steadfastly maintained that no money ever changed hands and said no official at Mississippi State ever made such an offer."
Conversations DOES NOT MEAN CECIL SOLICITED THE MONEY.
CECIL NEWTON DID NOT SOLICIT MONEY FROM MISSISSIPPI STATE. Kenny Rogers tried to buy Cecil. Cecil discussed it with Kenny, and decided instead to encourage his son to go to a CLEAN PROGRAM at Auburn, and it looks like it was a brilliant move as his son had one of the greatest seasons in NCAA history, won a National Championship, and won the Heisman Trophy. Then when the controversy came about Cecil took the controversy on himself instead of letting it fall on Cam. He allowed the morons in the media to vilify him to protect his son.
If you go back to the article that you're quoting you'll see a completely different take:
Cecil Newton is confident the NCAA will find no other improprieties. "We really just want it to calm down, let the smoke settle, let the dust settle," Newton said Thursday in a rare interview. "The truth is out there. They have it in their files."
"I don't really want to go back and rehash that and speak along the lines of what I did or didn't do, what was said, what should have been said. I really don't even want to open that can of worms... I've been transparent throughout the whole process."
And the reason he answered it that way, is because Cecil never solicited anything from anyone. If you go read the articles where Cecil "admits solicitation", it clearly says he HAD CONVERSATIONS about money with Kenny Rogers. That DOESN'T MEAN that Cecil is the one that asked for money.
https://www.wsbtv.com/sports/25778803/detail.html
"a source close to the situation exclusively told channel 2 action news investigative reporter Mark Winne that the player's father, Cecil Newton, has admitted having conversations with an ex-Mississippi State University player about the possibility of under-the-table money if Cam Newton signed to play football at Mississippi State, though he's steadfastly maintained that no money ever changed hands and said no official at Mississippi State ever made such an offer."
Conversations DOES NOT MEAN CECIL SOLICITED THE MONEY.
CECIL NEWTON DID NOT SOLICIT MONEY FROM MISSISSIPPI STATE. Kenny Rogers tried to buy Cecil. Cecil discussed it with Kenny, and decided instead to encourage his son to go to a CLEAN PROGRAM at Auburn, and it looks like it was a brilliant move as his son had one of the greatest seasons in NCAA history, won a National Championship, and won the Heisman Trophy. Then when the controversy came about Cecil took the controversy on himself instead of letting it fall on Cam. He allowed the morons in the media to vilify him to protect his son.
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 7/1/11 at 8:10 am to dkreller
quote:
Really though, since you seem to be a supreme court justice and all, can you please enlighten me on the availability of federal wiretaps?
I mean I love me some "Law and Order" and all, but if my memory serves me right, any evidence that is submitted in any trial becomes public record huh? (unless JFK is involved)
Please.
Now I'm asking you nicely. Don't come back with some lame arse deflection, at least supply a link.
I really don't want to ask my lawyer brother about something as trivial as the cheating of Auburn University.
The defense has already heard all the wiretaps and recordings.
The Wiretaps were only done for a little over a month from March 1, 2010 until April 7,2010, and there wasn't a single solitary mention of Cam or Auburn on them.
Then there were the 20 tape recordings with Lewis recording Gilley and McGregor from March 2009 til April 2010. Again, no mention of Auburn or Cam, or anything like that.
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 7/1/11 at 8:05 am to ever43
quote:No kook-aid over here "brah", just the cold hard fact that outside of Vandy, there's not another team in the SEC that could have withstood this level of scrutiny by the NCAA and the national media and come out clean... "brah"
They don't drink the kook-aid over here like ITAT brah. Just a heads up.
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 7/1/11 at 8:03 am to dkreller
quote:They've already been released to the defense and and there's nothing on there about Auburn.
when FBI tapes become public record, Auburn = arse fricked without lube
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 6/30/11 at 8:24 pm to ChemicalXen
quote:
Auburn's guilty as frick
Because ChemicalXen says so on a message board!
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 6/30/11 at 8:20 pm to bamascott2
quote:
GFY. Honestly.
Showing that bammer class! Is that you Scott Moore?
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 6/30/11 at 8:17 pm to sug314
quote:
Well my Auburn "friend"....USC is getting hammered 7 years later, in case u have been living under a rock....so go ahead, have a drink & enjoy your 9month investigation...
As was pointed out by the president of the NCAA, the two cases aren't similar. The Newton's never received a penny, and co-operated with the investigation.
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 6/30/11 at 8:14 pm to BradPitt
quote:
My a-hole is clean, I'm talking squeaky clean!
TMI.
re: AU must be squeaky clean
Posted by gr82bAnAUTiger on 6/30/11 at 8:10 pm to Govt Tide
quote:
Unlike Auburn, most SEC schools actually make a reasonable effort to report infractions when they occur and take steps to actually fix those problems. Auburn takes the "kiss our a## and prove it if you can" approach with NCAA compliance. Seriously, when is the last time you heard of Auburn reporting a secondary violation? They didn't even address the Tiger Prowl secondary violations until the NCAA got involved in the matter. Either Auburn is MUCH MUCH cleaner than the rest of the SEC or they simply don't self report like the rest of the league. I'll let others be the judge of which one they believe.
Wow, you couldn't be more wrong, Auburn reports minor secondary violations every single year.
What's ironic, is you can't find Alabama's online anywhere, so I guess you just made an argument that your own program is dirty?
Popular
19
