Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:559
Registered on:11/15/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Box and 1 is middle school stuff.

They just need to be smart and timely with their double team, trapping, and rotations.
I like it how it is. I liked the BCS how they tried to get the 2 best teams to play for the championship.

But sometimes the #3 team had an argument.

So to remedy that, they added the #3 team and #4 team to the mix so now everyone who is deserving of playing for the National Championship can decide it on the field.



It's perfect.



There is no need to expand it to 8 teams. I like the high-stakes of college football how it was with the BCS and how it is now.

I don't want the #8 team getting a shot.
quote:

So if the sex noises were lower in volume, you would be okay with it?
I don't know... I mean, it's also kind of awkward if you're watching a show and the next scene cuts on and it's just some woman getting drilled from behind for 20 seconds.

And it's also annoying when it happens like 3 or 4 times in one show.
I've been watching The Americans. A lot of the show is just people talking in somewhat hushed voices, so I have to turn the volume up a good bit to hear.

Then they cut to the next scene which is some woman getting plowed and moaning her head off.

Sounds like I'm watching porn or something.

re: Brett Farve - Sponsorships

Posted by Ralph Nader on 1/5/16 at 7:10 am
But Toughblade shaves you better and saves you more.
quote:

but that doesn't and should carry over to next year.
But it does carry over and you know it. When the SEC is considered to be the best conference, it helps all teams in the conference in the rankings.


quote:

So? There were still just as many teams from the B1G and Big XII in the playoff as SEC teams and just as many ACC teams as SEC teams in the final. LSU and OM still have 3 loses and didn't sniff the playoff. So we will be ranked 15 maybe instead of 22,. Yay?
Because in the cases where there are teams with one or two losses and they are trying to figure out who should get in, being in a conference with a strong reputation could be the boost needed to put that team ahead of the other 1 or 2 loss teams in the rankings.

It matters. Stop pretending that it doesn't.

LSU got to the national championship with 2 losses. Alabama got to the national championship to play against LSU after they had already lost to them and didn't even make the conference championship game.

If they were in the Big 10, do you think they would have gotten the benefit of the doubt in those cases? Most likely not.
quote:

Who gives a crap about "looking better?"

You either win or you don't.

Bottom-line.

Iowa, TCU, Stanford, etc would not have had a problem of making the playoff if they took care of business.

Do you think people sit around saying "LSU looks a lot better after losing because Alabama beat Michigan State."

You think the general public gives a shite about this stuff.

No, they care that Alabama won.

You didn't win, the SEC didn't win and your next door neighbor didn't win shite either.
Oh look, another idiot who doesn't get it.

You know who cares about "looking better"? Voters. The people making the rankings. Having a loss to an SEC team is a lot better than having a loss to teams from another conference. It doesn't count against you as much.

And winning against SEC teams is a boost that another conference doesn't get.

Having a very strong conference boosts your wins against conference opponents and softens the losses against conference opponents.




And it's not just some kind of false perception that the SEC was stronger than all other conferences the past decade or so. It was proven in their out of conference records. And often times, it was a higher-seeded team from another conference losing to a lower-seeded team in the SEC.

For example... two similarly-ranked teams might play each other from the Big 10 and SEC. However, that team in the Big 10 might be their #3 ranked team in their conference, and they are playing the SEC's 6th best team. Yet they are comparable teams, and the SEC team often wins.

Because the SEC is strong, to get a competitive match-up in a bowl game, they have to match up a #3 Big 10 team with a #6 SEC team in the bowl game.


If you went ranking by ranking:

SEC #1 vs. Big 10 #1
SEC #2 vs. Big 10 #2

Etc...


The SEC would be the best conference without a doubt when ranking tit for tat like that.



They've had a few down years recently, but the SEC being the best conference in college football was not even a question for the past decade or longer.

quote:

No. The post I referred to was someone beating his chest over teams that LSU beat beating other teams. I mentioned Arkansas because Toledo.
I wasn't even talking about this year specifically. I was talking about in general.

It makes LSU look better when the teams they beat in their own conference beat other teams out of conference.

But then you have to get all butt-hurt and try to point out the exceptions.
quote:

Like Arkansas? Or Florida? Or A&M?

Louisville was 5th in the ACC and Texas A&M was 9th in the SEC.

If Louisville played the 5th best team in the SEC they would have played Georgia or LSU.


Florida was a completely different team after they lost their QB.





And I don't know what Arkansas has to do with anything considering they haven't played their bowl game yet.
quote:

I hate the stupid pro sec crap. Seriously this has to be one of the stupidest things. So what your rivals beat some team? Who cares? How does that help you in any way shape or form?
Because we know how brutal the SEC is.

People in the Pac12, Big10, ACC, and Big12 don't believe it's that tough.

I enjoy seeing SEC schools beat the crap outta these schools from other conferences because maybe people will realize how brutal it is to play these SEC teams week in and week out.



Being an LSU fan, it makes LSU's record look even more impressive when they can run through teams that beat the crap outta schools from other conferences.
quote:

Would you count as white or black given your recent DNA results?

I'm a proud black man.
quote:

Why so obsessed over race?
I'm not.

quote:

I bet you love the OT which scours the internet for minority based crime.
I've never posted on the OT and never read the OT.



quote:

It takes more than speed to be a good running back anyway.
Of course it does... but speed is really the only thing that separates black and white athletes. There are more black players with raw speed, it seems.

quote:

Why not you just enjoy the damn games

I can multi-task.
quote:

Not sure how timely this thread is as they seem to be making a comeback over the past few years. Quite a few now.

You can probably still count them on one hand in all of the power 5 conferences.
There are a lot of strong and fast white guys out there.

I mean, they might not be Tyson Gay on the track... but they don't have to be the absolute fastest guys on the field.

There are plenty of white guys who are fast enough to be a good running back.



So why are they so rare? I mean, I can understand there being more black running backs. But a white running back is almost unheard of. They shouldn't be THAT rare.

What gives?
I would have named him Fig, but whatever.

re: Spidercam appreciation

Posted by Ralph Nader on 12/31/15 at 10:59 pm
Watching it on the big screen with surround sound is pretty cool because it sounds like you would hear the game in the stadium.

Plus the camera angles are pretty cool.


It's a nice switch-up from the regular broadcast.


The game feels much more intense when you just hear the sounds of the game without the announcer's commentary. I don't know why. It just does.
It's a shame Jeremy Hill didn't get more touches per game.

re: The Hat returns

Posted by Ralph Nader on 12/29/15 at 9:22 am
Thinking of the game
Whoops, ran to the wrong sideline
I am embarrassed