Cowboyfan89
| Favorite team: | McNeese State |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 13046 |
| Registered on: | 9/4/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Trump to open up more national parks to hunting, eliminate many regulations
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 5/12/26 at 1:13 pm to Ron Cheramie
quote:
This is slowly happening
There is a proposed bill from Bill Cassidy to transfer the Kisatchie lands in Grant Parish to the police jury
True, but Mike Lee has tried this for years out in Utah with no success, and there's alot more support for transfer of federal lands out west than there is here. Those attempts aren't subversive.
But take management of a NF or NWR out of the hands of the federal employees, and continue to sniffle their ability to manage said lands with budget and staffing cuts--now you've created an environment where "the only logical answer is to give it to the people that have been managing it."
Which isn't the case at all, but now you've shown that it's the "locals" managing it, not the feds. Now you have public support for such a transfer.
What most people don't realize is that if you transferred all of the federal land in LA into state or local control, it wouldn't remain in their control long because they couldnt afford to actually manage it.
re: Trump to open up more national parks to hunting, eliminate many regulations
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 5/12/26 at 1:09 pm to REB BEER
quote:
Personally, I've never deer hunted public land, but i think it should be available to those who want to.
It is available.
It just doesnt have the rifle season that private does, and for good reason--if you had the same rifle season on KNF as you do in Area 2, those deer would be getting hammered by every Tom, Dick, and Harry for 2.5 months.
You wouldn't have a deer herd very long if you did that.
re: Trump to open up more national parks to hunting, eliminate many regulations
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 5/12/26 at 9:09 am to nolaks
quote:
That would be horrible for the waterfowl hunting
Yeah, alot of people will celebrate this, but if they don't at least have some restrictions, these places will be terrible very quickly.
Public lands need to have more restrictions on them than private. There needs to be a balance between true "refuge" and hunting (i.e., we shouldn't have 100k acre NWRs where hunting is prohibited). But I suspect this administration is going to overcorrect and have it wide open.
This feels like a subversive way to pass management off to the states, then claim that "well they are doing a great job 'managing' the land, so why should the federal government maintain ownership?"
re: Logos that didn’t need to change
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 5/12/26 at 7:00 am to UKWildcats
quote:
To this horseshite two birds fricking logo Nike is pushing on us:
I couldn't see it, then I saw it. Now I can't unsee it...
:lol:
re: Vatican investigating Diocese of Baton Rouge
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 5/9/26 at 12:18 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
At some point, the Catholic Church will figure out letting priests marry and have sex with women will solve so many of their problems.
Yeah, because married men can't be in the closet, right?
I've known men that were married to women, only to come out as gay.
It's not a "not allowed to marry" problem.
re: CCA announces 2 new artificial reefs in Lake Charles...
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/29/26 at 9:24 am to DuckSausage
quote:
Rock the ship channel before the channel, lake, west cove become one single body of water.
My understanding has always been that jetties/rock armoring don't happen near as much anymore because of federal agencies like NMFS opposing it because of interference with fish passage.
re: Question: The work acronym you hate the most..
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/15/26 at 6:28 pm to suavecito80
quote:
New manager has a team meeting every morning
He said "Micromanager: challenge accepted!!"
:lol:
I don't know if theres one I hate, but theres some that I get tired of seeing all the time.
What I do hate is when people just assume you know what an acronym means.
re: Leesville man lies about where he caught fish, ends up with forgery/attemp theft charges
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/14/26 at 7:57 am to Loup
quote:
The arrests are the result of an investigation into the theft of two Generac Generators owned by VPSO from a VPSO storage facility. The incident occurred in February 2019.
Not that I'm condoning crime, but if you're going to commit crime, don't commit it against the guys paid to stop it or investigate it when it happens.
Dumb and cheap is no way to go through life, baw.
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/6/26 at 4:01 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Dude, did you even read my post
I did.
quote:
The irony is
that you seem to think we are talking about The Lord of the Rings where the author controls the entire environment and nothing outside of the book impacts the story.
The Bible is a record of real events, taking place at some point in history. That means that there are things that may not have been recorded in the book that impact how the book is understood and interpreted. I doubt anyone that wrote those books thought people would be debating the meaning of it 2000 years later without using spoken word and by sending written messages over invisible signals.
:lol:
So naturally, there are details that they assumed their audience would understand that didn't require explanation. A prime example of that is Jesus telling people "if someone makes you go a mile, go with him two". Jews would have understood what that meant in that time. How many non-Jewish people know what that means today? Someone made a comment in a discussion about The Chosen in the M/TV Board that most people today probably wouldn't understand how reviled the tax collectors like Matthew were back then, but that's not really explained.
It wasn't written in such a way that every verse can stand on its own without some understanding of the culture at the time.
Maybe we can agree to disagree on that, I don't know.
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/6/26 at 12:28 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
This is another fundamental misunderstanding of the Jewish calendar and how it works based upon New Testament scholars who don’t understand what they’re looking at
You keep arguing that the issue is with how the scholars interpret it, but seems to me the issue is your interpretation and lack of consideration to anything outside of the Bible, like historic norms. You can take it literally all you want--the non-biblical evidence that inclusive reckoning was the norm of the time is strong. So the reason biblical scholars don't take his words literally in this case is because it didn't mean 3, 24 hour days.
quote:
And no, I am not basing this off of Palm Sunday specifically. I was just presenting a coherent chronological order.
So by your own admission, Nissan 10 doesnt have to align with Palm Sunday; you just did it because of the literal interpretation of Matthew 12:40.
The minute you consider that maybe it wasn't meant literally, or that the way they kept time was not the same way we do, that opens the possibility that the crucifixion occurred on what we would know as Friday.
In the end, nobody knows for sure, and it doesnt really matter. The Church could have easily decided to treat Easter the same way Christmas is treated--i.e., moving based on where a specific date/event falls. The whole "controversy" (if it even is one) comes from the setting of it on a particular day of the week that wasn't even used by the Jews at the time. The "7th day" was always the sabbath for them. April 7th, 2026 is a Tuesday, i.e., not a Sabbath (which we would equate to "Saturday" in current times).
Nisan 15 (according to the sources I've seen) fell on April 1/2, 2026 (Wednesday/Thursday).
re: The Chosen - Who's caught up and what's the board's opinion on the series?
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/6/26 at 11:54 am to finchmeister08
quote:
that's the problem with multiple interpretations.
I mean, I've always kind of laughed at the fact that even the 4 gospels aren't consistent on the events that are documented in each. The where, who, how seems to vary by Gospel, which is wild to me...:lol:
re: The Chosen - Who's caught up and what's the board's opinion on the series?
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/6/26 at 7:47 am to meeple
Before I read it, let me ask you this--what qualifications does Pastor Gabriel have that I should trust over the rabbi, Catholic priest, and university professor that the show consults with?
I'm not asking this to discredit him, but there is a stark difference between some seemingly random Protestant pastor on the internet and the 3 men that the production company chose to consult with.
Father Mike Schmitz recently put out a video that is very clearly alluding to The Chosen when he essentially criticizes the way people have tried to recharacterize Judas's motivations for betraying Jesus. We only know what is portrayed in the Gospels, which is that he was a thief, and he betrayed him for 30 pieces of silver. That doesnt necessarily prescribe motive. Maybe it was as simple has he was looking for a quick buck. Maybe he just got tired of Jesus, but why not just walk away if that were the case? Others did. The story The Chosen tells, while not in the Bible, at least gives some rationale to why he did it. Is it accurate? Who knows. And ultimately, all that matters is that he did betray him--the reasons don't matter.
They make it clear from the start that it's a TV show based on the Gospels. They never claim to remain 100% true to the phrasing of every verse. I guess if people feel their faith is threatened by that, they shouldn't watch.
But I'll fall back to what I said before: it's a much better show to watch--even if they take liberties with the presentation of certain events, or the creation of back stories--than most shows on TV or streaming today.
But, I love to make this point also--taking issue with some creativity in a show based on the Gospels is no different than taking issue with movies or TV shows based on true stories. If someone wants to take issue with those--fine. But the only reason people seem to get more frustrated with The Chosen doing it is because it's based on Jesus.
No one really cares that the T.C. William Titans actually spanked everyone, or that Gerry didn't get hurt until after the state championship. That doesn't make a great movie.
You wouldn't have much of a TV show if they didn't do some of this. Episode 1 would be Jesus calling his disciples, then Episode 2 is them at some rando's wedding...how did we get here again?
:lol:
I'm not asking this to discredit him, but there is a stark difference between some seemingly random Protestant pastor on the internet and the 3 men that the production company chose to consult with.
Father Mike Schmitz recently put out a video that is very clearly alluding to The Chosen when he essentially criticizes the way people have tried to recharacterize Judas's motivations for betraying Jesus. We only know what is portrayed in the Gospels, which is that he was a thief, and he betrayed him for 30 pieces of silver. That doesnt necessarily prescribe motive. Maybe it was as simple has he was looking for a quick buck. Maybe he just got tired of Jesus, but why not just walk away if that were the case? Others did. The story The Chosen tells, while not in the Bible, at least gives some rationale to why he did it. Is it accurate? Who knows. And ultimately, all that matters is that he did betray him--the reasons don't matter.
They make it clear from the start that it's a TV show based on the Gospels. They never claim to remain 100% true to the phrasing of every verse. I guess if people feel their faith is threatened by that, they shouldn't watch.
But I'll fall back to what I said before: it's a much better show to watch--even if they take liberties with the presentation of certain events, or the creation of back stories--than most shows on TV or streaming today.
But, I love to make this point also--taking issue with some creativity in a show based on the Gospels is no different than taking issue with movies or TV shows based on true stories. If someone wants to take issue with those--fine. But the only reason people seem to get more frustrated with The Chosen doing it is because it's based on Jesus.
No one really cares that the T.C. William Titans actually spanked everyone, or that Gerry didn't get hurt until after the state championship. That doesn't make a great movie.
You wouldn't have much of a TV show if they didn't do some of this. Episode 1 would be Jesus calling his disciples, then Episode 2 is them at some rando's wedding...how did we get here again?
:lol:
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/6/26 at 5:13 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Sunday - Nisan 10
- Exodus 12:3 - The lamb is chosen and taken into the home for four days of inspection.
- The Triumphal Entry. Jesus enters Jerusalem, presenting Himself as the Lamb of God.
You still haven't actually proven how anything indicates that these events would have fallen on what we currently know as Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, etc.
It appears that you're using what we currently recognize as "Palm Sunday", the entry into Jerusalem, as the basis for your claim, when theres nothing to suggest this to be the case. The closest we get is Jesus entry occurring 5 days before Passover, which would have been Nissan 10. But no indication is given that this would be the same day that we now call Sunday.
You also appear to be basing "3 days" on 24 hour days. Didn't the Jews of that time use "inclusive reckoning"? If so, then Friday would have had to be "Day 1" in order for Sunday to be "Day 3".
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/5/26 at 8:31 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Go actually read the Bible yourself - look at what I wrote - read the verses
I mean, I most certainly will because I'm genuinely curious to see if theres any real indication within the Gospels or Acts. But so far the only time frame I've seen for his arrival was 5 days before Passover in John. That gives no indication of what day of the week that would have been.
All I know is that every attempt I've ever seen to correlate the Jewish calendar to the Gregorian calendar between the years that Jesus's ministry is assumed to have occurred only produces one year (AD 34) with Passover landing on a Thursday.
The two most popular years (30 and 33) both presumably had Passover occur on a Friday.
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/5/26 at 7:57 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Because they aren’t reading the Bible in its totality
You think a biblical scholar doesn't understand things necessary to interpreting the Bible better than you?
:lol:
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/5/26 at 3:54 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Thursday. He was crucified on Thursday
How are you coming to this when many biblical scholars believe he was crucified on Friday, April 3, 33 AD based on all of the evidence in the Bible?
re: Interesting analysis - Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was resurrected on Saturday
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/5/26 at 3:01 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
In first century Jewish culture, the Sabbath ended on Saturday after sunset. I hope this helps.
Not only that, but I believe they counted that "day", even if it was only part of a day.
So:
Crucified on Friday afternoon (Day 1)
Laid in the Tomb Saturday (Day 2)
Resurrected on Sunday (Day 3)
It's not 24 hour days. It's just what day of the week it happened on.
re: The Chosen - Who's caught up and what's the board's opinion on the series?
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/5/26 at 2:55 pm to meeple
quote:
Why would God refuse worship?
Are we talking about the same guy that constantly said "the first shall be last and the last shall be first" and taught his disciples to serve others?
quote:
Not only did Nicodemus not accept Jesus at this time in scripture
John 3:2 literally says "He [Nicodemus] came to Jesus at night and said to him, 'Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God, for no one can do these signs that you are doing unless God is with him."
No where does it say Nicodemus didn't accept him.
re: Lowes $2 bag mulch extended to 4/22
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/5/26 at 2:46 pm to weadjust
I swear they've been running this sale 2 weeks at a time for the last 2 months. I've gone in 3 or 4 separate times over the last 2 months and this same sale has been going on every time.
re: Woodworkers here? Why it is great.
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/4/26 at 11:05 am to N2cars
quote:
I've also learned that you can cut a board twice and it's still too short.
:lol:
One of the great mysteries of working with lumber.
Always amazes me when I measure things 3 or 4 times, cut the board, and that damn thing is still to long/short. Wth, board?! Doesn't happen often, but when it does, I just quit for the day.
re: Be kind to the Easter bunny this weekend
Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/4/26 at 5:56 am to S
Ole boy must have complained one too many times about those nasty Peeps in his basket instead of another Cadbury egg.
:lol:
:lol:
Popular
0












