Favorite team:Southeastern LA 
Location:New Orleans
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:13493
Registered on:7/30/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Was that even a conspiracy theory? It's not even an open secret with the lower income demographic that they do it, it's just an open fact.
quote:

She made that choice. Her mother is a citizen so they can file the family petition. Chances are good since she is under a year


There may be some alternative options, I would suggest speaking an immigration attorney. FWIW the bar for over stay of 180-364 days is only 3 years, not 10.
quote:

Once you over stay a year the chances of coming back are slim to none


Correct, unless you wait outside 10 years.
quote:

ICE is not deporting the women and children and their anchor babies.


:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

I have some ocean front property in Arizona to sell you.
quote:

It won’t be replaced overnight, and anyone can see that. If their labor is so integral to our country’s future, why hasn’t it always been this way? The answer would be that our own government has now created an entitlement class that is unwilling to do those jobs anymore.



And a policy of mass deportations without mass entitlement cuts are going to have some interesting economic impacts.
quote:

How easy would we have to make the process to get these “good hombres” to want to get their asses in gear? They had a good thing going for awhile


There, generally speaking, is no process to legalize yourself for most people. It’s why anchor babies are a big myth.
quote:

ROLANDO CHUB-SUB


What a name. :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
quote:

It “matters,” yes, but the play was to clearly let them in, securing their votes and then stack the system with your own legislators, judges, and administrators and it damn near worked.


I genuinely can't understand the reasoning behind Biden's border policy. What you say makes sense, but the easier route would be to simply offer an amnesty for people already here.

Under Trump the highest month of approvals for those in court proceedings was 4400 approvals and Biden's highest was 4700. 300 is negligible. Not like these people were coming in and instantly being given status.

Truly no rational basis for essentially erasing the border for 4 years other than to do the opposite of Trump.
quote:

Does that really matter when you rule by executive order?


Yes and no.

The BIA or AG can issue any precedent decision they want, but especially in a post-Chevron world, the circuit courts and SCOTUS ultimately get to decide the legality of the situation. So even if a DNC AG tried to say that economic persecution is enough for asylum the 5th, 6th, or 11th Circuits would for sure shut it down. So in that sense it does matter.

On the other hand the Biden policy of minimal to no border screening is an executive policy decision, so case law doesn't matter much, which is my point earlier.

Trump has secured the border in 11 months tighter than it has been in my lifetime. Even some of the biggest leftist I know agree with that because ultimately we need to know who is in our country. That can go away with the stroke of a pen in January 2029 though.
quote:

That’s not what that means and libs changed what qualifies as “asylum” to include economic hardship which is total bullshite. Any nation in the world has less economic prosperity so it can be used as a tool to grant anyone asylum they want.



That's actually not true legally speaking. There is no BIA or circuit precedent that recognizes economic hardship as a basis for asylum. There is some very specific law on situations where severe economic restrictions can constitute persecution but very rare.

Now that isn't to say that the left doesn't use terms like "economic refugee" and "climate refugee" but those aren't currently recognized legal concepts.

quote:

Asylum is without argument being abused


When Sessions was AG he began to address that issue with border crossings. Biden mostly ignored it for the first 3 years of his presidency, and then when he was getting hammered in the polls in early 2024 they started ramping back up the Trump 1.0 use of Credible Fear Interviews and not issuing general parole. Biden also implemented the Circumvention of Lawful Pathway rule which is still in effect that if made you ineligible, but for a few exceptions, if you entered at a place besides a port of entry.
quote:

do you have some examples of how long they were here and when they were vetted?



If they are naturalizing they had to have been a resident for 5 years. Who was president 5 years ago when they filed their application for their residency?

quote:

Often times, no

These people are all already here, and that’s the problem with 90% of you retards argument. Live in reality, we aren’t going to be able to round up 10s of millions of people and get them out of here… for a million reasons. So can we stop acting like idiots and find a sensible realistic solution to a very real problem?

Or we can keep making idiotic tik toks that do nothing so we can rabble rabble with the people we already know agree with us.

So fricking dumb


We've had the chance, in real time, to watch the pendulum swing back and forth since 2015 depending on who won the election from Trump 1.0 deportation efforts (which was mostly moderate) to Biden's lax border and programs like CHNV parole that was filed with fraud to Trump 2.0 which is extremely harsh.

The last 11 months have been going all in on executive power like there won't ever be another president that isn't a MAGA ideologue. There has been no codified changes to the immigration law or policy, and if they have any hope of doing it the clock is running out before 2026. The pendulum is going to swing back in 2028 and it will make Biden's term look like he took the border serious. Even as pro-immigration as I am, that is not good for the country.

But lol the libs got pwned and we got some Ice Ice Baby TikToks!
quote:

The folks I mentioned were in the last step of the legal naturalization process


were they here illegally?


Does it matter? The INA has very specific requirements to go from being illegal to legal. So if they took the steps why does it matter?

Thought we just wanted people to "follow the law."
quote:

“Pardon My Take,” “The Ryen Russillo Podcast” and Spittin’ Chiclets.”


The cream of the crop for Barstool podcasts, and honestly some of the best sports podcast in general. I don't even like hockey but Biz and Whit are hilarious.

Not sure how many people will log in to watch, especially when Big Cat said 80% of PMT listeners are audio, but good on Barstool for getting the bag every way they can. Big Cat said this deal will fund a ton of other programming.
Both primaries for the 2028 noms will get messy. Anyone trying to poll that shite right now is going to get no reliable data.
Lincoln Riley beefing up that OOC schedule!
I got my wife Petrossian last year for Christmas and I don't remember it being outrageous.

I do second the Whole Foods recommendation. We usually get a couple ounces for NYE from there. I think even regular price it's not terrible.
quote:

don't understand how ND can consider itself a power team either. They just played for a chip, went 10-2 this year…


There are maybe 5 or 6 programs that have accomplished more than ND in the last 10 years.

OSU, UGA, Clemson, Bama, LSU, and Michigan. LSU and Michigan won titles in that time but have been meh more often than not in that time frame, especially Michigan. Clemson is falling out of that tier too. There’s no other teams besides those 6 I would trade ND’s last 10 years for.
quote:

If you’re here on a green card and can’t financially support yourself, you have to go back.


FWIW that is the law already. Trump in both terms has ramped up the requirements to demonstrate that a person won't be a "public charge."

quote:

Illegals getting welfare to begin with is asinine.


If the program is receiving federal funds they legally aren't supposed to be. Now since the state administers the programs I'm sure some do. Think some states, like California, may have totally state funded programs that don't care about status.
quote:

This is not sustainable.


1000000% agree our welfare system is unsustainable, and I include Social Security in that as well.

quote:

Why is it misleading? Whether it's going to the anchor baby or not, the illegal is the cause of another mouth for taxpayers to feed.



For the Medicaid part it's only for the citizen children, so the household may be 5 people, but if only 3 are citizens then those are the only 3 getting Medicaid. Likewise, and if I am wrong on this happy to retract, but SNAP benefits are given on a per person who qualifies basis, so using that example the amount the household is given isn't for a household of 5 but for a household of 3 based on only 3 people in it qualifying. So the illegal parents aren't getting extra money than what the 3 children would be receiving regardless of their parents' status.

It's misleading because CIS wanted those numbers to be higher so they named it "illegal lead household" to imply that the illegals were receiving the benefits and not the US citizen children in that household.
quote:

Sark has already gone on record saying that he is re-evaluating their non-conference schedule after the next two years.


Sounds like Sark is scared. :dunno: