Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1613
Registered on:3/15/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: MBB: LSU 62 vs. #21 Arkansas 91

Posted by Decisions on 2/10/26 at 2:03 pm to
I’m gonna go ahead and wear black. We can have a second line down to Fred’s afterwards.
There’s not a stark swing, no matter what some may claim. There are loads of families (mine included) north of what is traditionally claimed as Cajun Country with French heritage and cultural customs/influences. I grew up on both traditional Cajun food and Southern food at home, loads of us celebrate Mardi Gras locally, and some of us even learned a bit of French as kids.

South Louisiana should stop trying to be so derogatory and cliquey and start trying to proselytize. People want to join and contribute. That’s how you grow the culture.
There’s a lot of overlap between several of the options you posted. I think the best system is protection from outside state players, relatively laissez-faire domestic regulation, and the very occasional trust-busting/utilitification. Keep the government to an absolute minimum.

re: 2026: A nowhere to hide market?

Posted by Decisions on 2/5/26 at 2:09 pm to
If gold/silver don’t drop back too much their respective miners are eventually going to pop big time. Lots of talking heads also thing energy (especially O&G) is the next big commodity to run. That’s what I’d be looking at.
Money isn’t everything. --always said by a rich dude with a paid off house and cushy job

You just need to pick a woman. Have some kids. Don’t worry about divorce or affordability. —always said by the worst fools who wouldn’t stand a chance in the modern dating scene and probably weren’t great parents
If the company just kept doing exactly what it does now and nothing else the value it provides is immense. Affordable internet around the world without needing to build/maintain piles of infrastructure like fiber optics or towers? Game changing.

It’s comparable to someone making hover cars widespread and thus crushing the upkeep/maintenance of roads.

Now do I think they’ll have relatively no competition long-term? No. The margins are too huge. We’ve already heard of the Bezos rockets and whatnot, but eventually someone in Japan, China, etc. is going to do this, as well. How long that takes is up for debate, though. It could take them a decade or more.

On the flip side I also don’t expect SpaceX to rest on its laurels, either. I doubt anything else they do will be as revolutionary, but it doesn’t need to be to stay in the pole position.

This is like when Apple came out with the iPhone. It will be improved and reiterated on, but a market leader like this can coast on one amazing idea for a long time.

re: Do P/E ratios still matter?

Posted by Decisions on 1/30/26 at 8:14 pm to
Not as long as the overall market sentiment is positive and the stock in question is in a “sexy” field.

There’s so much dumb money sloshing around right now.

re: How fake is the US economy?

Posted by Decisions on 1/21/26 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

When in the history of the US was it ever not prudent to buy the dip?


Many tech stocks who survived the .com crash never really recovered. The 70’s was a “lost decade” for the stock market across the board.
It would be pretty hard for us to take it worse than OM is right now. He’d have to leave for Bama and win a natty or two there for it to even approach the levels of pettiness we’re seeing out of that bunch right now.
All fair points. I can’t say I disagree. I think there’s still a little demand for open-world if done right (BotW was very well received not that long ago), but it can’t be procedurally generated slop.
I think a lot of us had some disagreements with the official ratings a while back. What would you have rated differently?

A refresher on the system:

3 Stars: Worth making a special trip for

2 Stars: Worth making a detour for

1 Star: Worth stopping for

Bib Gourmand/Rising Stars: Those with good value/potential
quote:

I love the Pelicans but I don't see how or why the league would expand and end up with teams in cities like New Orleans or Memphis that are just doormats with owners who don't look like they give a flying frick about anything.


The league needs losers to make the stars shine brighter. You’ve got to know your role.
Faults with the tv series aside, I think this world would be pretty fun to play around in if done right. There’s loads of runway for future expansions and content. The shortage of true magic could make healing a bit of a lift to explain, but I’m willing to suspend disbelief, lol.
We’re just assassinating programs out here. You love to see it. By the time we’re done Mississippi State might be the best program in their state again. :lol:
Louisiana
Best: Food, drinking, events, social scene
Worst: jobs, culcha, politics
quote:

Remember when Marvin Harrison Jr got the Biletnikoff over Malik Nabors?


That was insult enough. Some of those tools actually thought he deserved the HEISMAN over Daniels. Insanity.

re: Kiffin ain’t leaving for bama

Posted by Decisions on 12/11/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:

And honestly I don't understand the Kiffin/Bama "dream job". Why? Because he was an OC for a few years there?


I think if Kiffin ever had a “dream job” it was USC. He spent a lot of his early career around the West Coast and the high-tide of that program under Pete Carroll.

Dream jobs are for kids. Kiffin is fifty now. A man grown. He cares about hard facts and what is needed to build his own legacy. Not basking in the afterglow of a program past its prime.
It’s because they view us as merely a wacky side character in college football. Not more worthy of the spotlight than”prestigious” programs like Notre Dame, Alabama, etc. On a state level we’re not viewed as a peer or serious people. We’re just those funny, dumb swamp people who like to party.
If Ole Miss has three natties then we have AT LEAST five. Maybe six.
Haven’t you heard? He’s el gaucho. :lol: