| Favorite team: | New Orleans Pelicans |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1880 |
| Registered on: | 12/23/2014 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Brett Seigel Reporting WG still coach Tuesday
Posted by Baron on 11/2/25 at 9:39 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
![]()

re: Pels vs Spurs: the Wemby Problem
Posted by Baron on 10/24/25 at 1:07 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
Sorry... Jose is not part of the future. The vision is clear. Fears is the future.
I understand that, and again I’m not trying to start the same argument that’s been going on all summer, but this is what is so incredibly frustrating about not having our pick this year.
Is our number 1 goal this year to win or is it to develop for the future?
re: Pels vs Spurs: the Wemby Problem
Posted by Baron on 10/24/25 at 12:51 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Fears took his minutes. I wish Jose would get Hawks minutes.
This is what I was afraid of. Obviously Fears played very well especially when you consider his age and this being his first game, but I cannot imagine we are a not a better team with Jose on the floor.
Zion plays his best with Jose. Each of the last 3 years, Zion’s +/- was highest when playing with Jose. We are in a weird catch 22, where we need Zion to play well, but want to give Fears minutes, but want to win, but we don’t play Jose.
I’m not looking to start this argument again on here, but we are seeing in game one the effects of the unclear vision for the future. We either want to win or want to develop the young players, this team is not in the position or have the foundation in place to do both. If we want to win this year, we have to find 15-18 minutes for Jose
re: Pels vs Spurs: the Wemby Problem
Posted by Baron on 10/24/25 at 12:30 pm to whatiknowsofar
Wasn’t sure if I missed it, but is there a reason why Jose didn’t play opening night?
re: Blazers HC Chauncey Billups and Heat guard Terry Rozier arrested by FBI
Posted by Baron on 10/23/25 at 12:05 pm to VL Lsutiger
quote:
Damon Jones and lebron use to be real close
LeBron sat the first game due to a “nerve” injury.
I’ll give him credit, he’s really committed to one-upping Jordan
quote:
Think Willie just draws a hangman puzzle on his whiteboard

re: Pels vs Grizzlies Game 1 Thread
Posted by Baron on 10/22/25 at 7:03 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
I am no longer a mod
Lasted longer than I thought you would
re: Pels Free Agency Thread: Scoop says Pels still pursuing Kuminga S&T, pg11
Posted by Baron on 7/2/25 at 11:25 am to Dantheman504
quote:
We could also give him like a (4) yr 90mil deal and do it 13-21-26-30.
Just load the back end, which that still wouldn't be a bad contract honestly.
Per year raises/declines are capped between 5-8%. Since he’s a sign and trade, he’d be capped at 8%. To give him 4/90, the lowest we could start him out at would be around $19.8m.
The other issue is the way the new cap rules work is that GSW can only take back about half of whatever Kuminga’s starting salary in contracts. In a way that helps us as it lowers the potential other suitors, but also limits our options of getting him and still avoiding the tax (ie we can’t Trade Murray for Kuminga). Even though I don’t think we should trade him, it is a big reason why Herb’s contract fits so well with a Kuminga trade.
Technically the Poole/CJ trade doesn’t become official until July 6th. Nothing is obvious, but it could potentially give us a couple more cap options expanding that we aren’t discussing
re: Opinion Request - SI Suggests CJ to Pistons
Posted by Baron on 5/3/25 at 9:30 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:
A deal for Fonteccio, who's not really any good but makes $8.3M on an expiring deal, and then a S&T of Hardaway in what is essentially a 1 year deal for $16.5M, would make the deal legal for just CJ.
Unless something has changed recently, you can’t add contracts to a S&T to match salary, so you couldn’t do that. To do a S&T with Hardaway we’d have to give him something like $22m to make it work.
Instead, the pistons could just renounce Hardaway’s cap hold and make the trade with minimal salary, but as you pointed out, DET has some guys they probably want to bring back like Beasley, as well as guys who are going to be needing extensions like Duran and Ivey. So a S&T doesn’t really make sense for either team.
A trade centered around CJ for Fonteccio and Stewart is a legal trade that makes the most sense for both teams and clears DET some salary too. I don’t think they’d do it, but I think it’s the most realistic trade scenario if we are moving CJ to DET
quote:
the Zion Stans here
I’m not sure these exist anymore, and if so they’re an endangered species.
I said this in another thread, and I’m not trying to dump on Ingram, but he shares some blame in this too. Since 2022-2023 season, Ingram has only played in 13 more games than Zion. By the time he comes back from his current injury it will probably be single digits.
Griff needs to take some heat here too though. I haven’t seen anyone mention it but a real contributing factor for why we are in this mess is because of the extension he gave to CJ. It was absolutely unnecessary to do it at the time he did and for the price. People were beating the drum at the time that this is going to really hamper our cap flexibility in the future and it has predictably lead to multiple sunk-cost moves. Think of all the things we’ve done (or couldn’t do) the last two years because of the cap/tax crunch. It really was just such an obvious and avoidable misstep
re: Teams very interested in Jose and CJ, Zion a hot commodity
Posted by Baron on 2/6/25 at 4:16 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
I love how people down vote this fact simply b/c they can’t accept acknowledging that BI is a really good player.
No one is downvoting that post because they believe that BI isn’t a good player. People are downvoting GI because he’s being unnecessarily bullish. He is arguing that the team is worse when Zion plays which is objectively false by any metric.
Everyone agrees that Zion’s unavailability or unreliability is an issue that has made it impossible to build a team around him so far in his career. Nearly everyone also agrees that his future with the Pels probably won’t last much longer.
Btw, and I don’t say this to bash Ingram, but in the last 2.5 years, Ingram has only played 13 more games than Zion. Each of them have some blame in this inability to share the court
quote:
agreed. Without him we’re a bottom 3 team in the league, with him we’re a bottom 15 team
:lol:
Touché, we could be 14-37 if he had been healthy all season
re: Teams very interested in Jose and CJ, Zion a hot commodity
Posted by Baron on 2/6/25 at 2:08 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
You should post our record with Ingram this year.
Sure, we are 5-13 with BI (.277 win percentage).
Pelicans overall record when they play:
Zion 103-96
BI 149-156
People can argue that we need to move on from Zion because he can’t stay healthy, is immature, has conditioning issues, can’t be a number 1 option, or any other off the court problems they want. But it’s simply dumb to act like the Pels aren’t better when he’s on the court
quote:
Had heard a lot about how many contenders had some interest in Brown. Not sure if that was true, but if so, would think it would have been easy to unload him for a 2nd with another expiring.
The problem is that we don’t want to take back anything with a future salary commitment or puts us back into the tax, and contenders don’t have the matching salary or the expirings to fit with Brown’s salary. The trade partner just doesn’t exist.
What is more surprising is that we haven’t moved Green since there were some rumblings of interest and nearly every team can make his salary work
re: Teams very interested in Jose and CJ, Zion a hot commodity
Posted by Baron on 2/6/25 at 1:49 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Our record is worse when he plays. The only teams we've beaten with Zion this year are teams we've also beaten without Zion this year.
Cold hard facts
We are 4-11 with Zion this year (.266 win percentage)
We are 8-28 without him (.222 win percentage)
We also beat IND and POR the first time we played them with Zion, but haven’t beat them without him.
So literally nothing you said is correct
re: So Griffin trades our opening day center..says well figure it out
Posted by Baron on 2/5/25 at 2:41 pm to poolplayah
I’m not defending Griffin, just want the timeline to be clear. We traded for Murray when we did because we had to get him before the start of the new league year otherwise his contract wouldn’t fit with the raise he was about to get.
Griffin gambled moving early in the offseason when getting Murray and thinking he could figure it out later, which never materialized. Obviously going into the season with Theis/Missi rotation at the 5 was probably plan F, but I’m curious what plans A - E looked like and how realistic they were. Griffin has shown in the past to have unrealistic offseason plans (i.e. signing Kyle Lowry)
Still, even if he is merely a victim of bad luck, this has become a common theme of the Griffin era: accumulate talent regardless of fit and figure it out later. We have had one of the most baffling roster constructions for the last 4 years in a row. Even worse, he does this knowing we dont have close to the level of coaching ingenuity needed to make it work.
In the end, I don’t think Griffin is a terrible GM, he’s made some good moves too and the injury problems aren’t entirely his fault, but this franchise has so many issues that we can’t get by with a GM/President who is merely passable. Coming in and fumbling this rebuild by trying to needlessly speed it up (after watching the guy before him do the exact same thing) is inexcusable. With how this year has gone, seeing other franchises start off their rebuilds after us but pass us up, it is clearly time to move on from Griffin
Griffin gambled moving early in the offseason when getting Murray and thinking he could figure it out later, which never materialized. Obviously going into the season with Theis/Missi rotation at the 5 was probably plan F, but I’m curious what plans A - E looked like and how realistic they were. Griffin has shown in the past to have unrealistic offseason plans (i.e. signing Kyle Lowry)
Still, even if he is merely a victim of bad luck, this has become a common theme of the Griffin era: accumulate talent regardless of fit and figure it out later. We have had one of the most baffling roster constructions for the last 4 years in a row. Even worse, he does this knowing we dont have close to the level of coaching ingenuity needed to make it work.
In the end, I don’t think Griffin is a terrible GM, he’s made some good moves too and the injury problems aren’t entirely his fault, but this franchise has so many issues that we can’t get by with a GM/President who is merely passable. Coming in and fumbling this rebuild by trying to needlessly speed it up (after watching the guy before him do the exact same thing) is inexcusable. With how this year has gone, seeing other franchises start off their rebuilds after us but pass us up, it is clearly time to move on from Griffin
re: Ingram hoping to return in 2-3 weeks
Posted by Baron on 1/26/25 at 9:18 am to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
If we are now referring to Ingram as “The Cancer” of the team, what does that make Zion? “The AIDS” of the team?
The “Diabetes” of the team. It was right there in front of you
Woof, I think I hate that for everyone. I’m trying to figure out who wins that trade and I think I’ve settled on the unknown facilitator receiving unknown/unwanted salary + unknown draft capital.
Then again, this is probably the best the Heat can hope for at this point
Then again, this is probably the best the Heat can hope for at this point
Like a kindergartener with his field trip money, someone needs to write out the rotation before every game and pin it to Willie’s shirt with a safety pin
re: Pels vs Celts
Posted by Baron on 1/12/25 at 5:18 pm to whatiknowsofar
CJ going to carry us to two in a row


Popular

1











