Sooner5030

all he had to do was not get worked up or sidetracked.

I hope it doesnt cost him the election.....but he's a fricking idiot.

tonight was a lay up. im worried he screwed that up.

she's not "winning". This is not a footbal game.

She is moderately achieving her goals and he is not achieving his goals.

His fricking ego might actually cost him the easiest election ever.

My problem with Trump and the Rep party - why do you agree to this shite.

I dont feel sorry for you when I can predict this. It gets old. Im tired of losers.

They will hold their noses as she is the only one that they believe can have full access to the $91M or so campaign money left.

If it's not her I believe the campaign would have to donate it to the party or give it back to the donors and hope they re-donate it to the new nominee.

"cant the party just use it then?" Yes....but then they get to decide how it's used. "they" might have different priorities and different ideas on how to best use it.

This is one of the many things that's wrong with politics, the media, and voters.

He did this to raise money and to get his name into the media cycle.

Voters and the media just blindly publish it and talk about.

Any reasonable and prudent person knows a constitutional amendment is not getting passed.

But here we are talking about it.

picking someone other than the person that won the primary sounds threatening to democracy lol

Dear Eight Pound, Six Ounce, Newborn Baby Jesus, in your golden, fleece diapers, with your curled-up, fat, balled-up little fists pawin' at the air......please keep Socali away from this board.

depends....the list that helps trump win might be a different order than the list that has the person I want in 28...or earlier should trump leave early.

quote:

---

Getting sick or injured is not a decision made by the sick or injured.

---

Not all healthcare is the same.

Routine and preventive care is a lot different than catastrophic care.

We should be able to treat routine and preventive care like any other free market like service. Neither the seller or buyer have any kind of advantage.

The problem with catastrophic care is the provider has all the negotiating power. No one has the ability to get quotes and read reviews when you're having a heart attack. This has created a lack of natural market price pressure on the service.

During the evolution from health insurance to HMOs to what he have now we have linked all health care together in some massive costs sharing program with only the insurance provider caring about the costs. And they are regulated to pool all costs...not just risks (which is what the insurance model was built for).

The current system also incentivizes going to the doctor or ER if there is any doubt.

Once we went to HMOs it was all down hill from there. People stopped having control of their care and wanted everything packaged into one nice cheap plan.

deregulate and delink healthcare from employment. There will be a disruption but things will resettle once people take charge of their care and insurance companies can go back to just insuring against risks.

If you go for a check up....freaking pay for it. It's your health.

dont care...none of my business.

I dont want him judging my bedroom behavior and I wont judge his.