Favorite team:LSU 
Location:false river
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:327
Registered on:8/4/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

Sold

Posted by cajunboi03 on 10/1/26 at 8:45 pm
Section 210 seats 1 & 2 row 10
First come first serve. 2255729680
It could. But even if it’s overturned at that point, you won’t be able to retroactively punish a school for following a court order that was valid at the time. And by that time the season will be over.
Yes. I think it’s just called the pyburn case. But it refers to all of the plaintiffs when they say that. But he is out. Idk who dubbed it “the pyburn case”. Maybe he was the first name in the suit. Idk
I also thinks it adds weight to winning the appeal that the sec will undoubtedly file right after.

To the Louisiana Supreme Court where 3 of the 4 judges are LSU graduates. Lol
It’s 14 pages long. I asked chat gpt to give cliff notes. This is what it said.

Here are the cliff notes in plain English:

What this is

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill is asking the Baton Rouge court for permission to submit an “amicus brief”—basically, Louisiana is not one of the players suing, but the State wants the judge to consider how the case affects Louisiana universities and college athletics.

What happened

According to the brief:

* Jack Pyburn and the other plaintiffs entered college in 2022.
* The NCAA originally said they would not have another season of eligibility.
* The NCAA then indicated they could receive an additional year.
* Around April 27, 2026, the NCAA reversed course again and took that eligibility away.
* Players made major life decisions based on those shifting rules—graduating, going professional, signing contracts, taking jobs, or deciding not to enter the transfer portal.
* On August 28, 2026, the Louisiana court issued a temporary restraining order allowing them to pursue playing opportunities, including entering the transfer portal.

Louisiana’s main argument

The AG calls the NCAA’s actions a “bait-and-switch.”

Louisiana argues that it is fundamentally unfair to make players follow one set of rules, encourage them to rely on those rules, and then change the rules after they have made decisions that cannot easily be undone.

The State is not arguing that NCAA rules can never change. It is arguing that changes must be fair, consistent, predictable, and account for players who reasonably relied on the previous rules.

The problem for LSU and other Louisiana schools

The court has ordered the NCAA and conferences not to enforce certain eligibility restrictions against these players. However, the SEC reportedly threatens serious penalties if a university allows an athlete to compete contrary to conference rules, including:

* Suspension of the head coach
* Loss of conference voting rights
* A fine equal to 50% of the school’s annual sports budget

That creates a no-win situation: a Louisiana university could obey the judge’s order but get punished by the SEC—or follow the SEC’s position and potentially disobey the court.

The AG argues that a public university should never have to choose between obeying a Louisiana court and protecting its coaches, athletic program, and public money.

What Louisiana wants

For now, the filing formally asks the judge to:

1. Allow Louisiana to submit this brief.
2. Consider the statewide consequences when deciding what relief the players should receive.
3. Protect players and universities from retaliation for following the court’s orders.
4. Push toward eligibility rules that are consistent and workable for everyone.

The biggest takeaway

This filing strongly supports Pyburn and the other players, but it is broader than simply saying, “Give them another season.”

Louisiana’s position is essentially:

The NCAA repeatedly moved the goalposts, players relied on what they were told, and Louisiana schools should not be punished for obeying a Louisiana judge.

It does not permanently decide Pyburn’s eligibility. The temporary restraining order is short-term protection while the court considers the larger case. But having the Louisiana Attorney General formally supporting the fairness argument is a significant boost for Pyburn and the other plaintiffs.
Y’all can come to ours. We are always hosting out of towners. It’s a good time. Here is my email. I’ll send you my phone number if you rather text. Bwaguillard@gmail.com

re: Knoxville recs to stay?

Posted by cajunboi03 on 5/12/26 at 12:21 pm to
You can. But we didn’t. If I remember right it’s about a mile walk. Maybe a little more.

re: Knoxville recs to stay?

Posted by cajunboi03 on 5/11/26 at 3:02 pm to
I stayed at the crowne plaza Downtown. It is the same owner that owns the one in baton rouge. Its across the street from market square, which has a ton of bars and restaurants, all within walking distance. Pretty cool area.
Hurt his foot in early Feb. cost him the rest of the season
Nope. Never got anything. Just listening on the radio.
Can someone help a guy out and send me a link ? Bwaguillard@gmail.com
Yt link or where ever

re: Delete

Posted by cajunboi03 on 2/15/26 at 10:45 am to
2255729680
next if you cant get in touch with him. bwaguillard@gmail.com
Idk. I shook his hand this morning.
Oh. It wasn’t like that. Was just eating breakfast. Saw them. Told them good luck. Hope you pick the tigers. It was just in passing. I was just letting yall know they are 100 percent on campus right now. I didn’t know Nash was visiting until I saw him.
I talked to him this morning at the rennassance. Also saw Mario Nash from Fla st.

re: Nakos/Wiltfong Portal Updates

Posted by cajunboi03 on 1/2/26 at 10:37 am to
I thought visits weren’t allowed until Monday ?
I know they have them online. I'm trying to buy from an individual to stay away from the fees if possible. let me know what you got please. 2255729680. bwaguillard@gmail.com