
Salviati
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7784 |
| Registered on: | 4/26/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:No combination of Bird, McHale, Ainge and Walton constitute the three top players for the Celtics. It's wrong.
No, that is not wrong. What he posted was a fact and you are denying that fact.
Bird, McHale, Ainge, and Walton. 4 of their top 6 players were white dudes. It's a fact.
Moreover, "4 of the top 6 players" does not contradict Smith's racist comment. It's wrong.
Smith's statement is racist.
But using the 80's Celtics as a counterargument to Smith's racist comment is wrong.
quote:You're wrong.
4 of the top 6 players were white, spin that however you like
And, as usual when you're wrong, you can't accept the fact that you're wrong.
That's not spin. That's fact.
re: Stephen A. rant Lakers ‘bunch of white dudes’ is unacceptable – racist much?
Posted by Salviati on 7/2/26 at 1:59 pm to riverdiver
quote:Smith's comment was racist. But stick with the fact that it was a racist comment. Don't get sidetracked by a Celtics counterargument.
I never said he was.
SAS yammered about a basketball team not being able to win with 3 prominent white players.
You’re saying a starting player wasn’t prominent?
Ok.
Smith did not say "3 prominent white players."
Smith said, "three top players" and "three most prominent players."
I'm not saying a starting player isn’t prominent. I'm pointing out that your argument is a strawman argument because it isn't what Smith said.
OK?
quote:I'm not forgetting anyone.
You’re forgetting Walton. I know he wasn’t really part pf the core for that era but he was key for their greatest team in 86.
Smith talked about the Three Top Players. Parish was the starting center for the Celtics in 1986. Parish was an All-Star who averaged 16.1 points, 9.5 rebounds, and 1.4 blocks in 31.7 minutes per game.
Walton was NOT one of the Three Top Players for the Celtics in 1986. He was not even a starter. Walton was a sixth man who averaged 7.6 points, 6.8 rebounds, and 1.3 blocks in 19.3 minutes,
re: Stephen A. rant Lakers ‘bunch of white dudes’ is unacceptable – racist much?
Posted by Salviati on 7/2/26 at 12:06 pm to riverdiver
quote:Ainge was good.
But since he’s yammering about having three white guys on the team, the Celtics with Bird, Ainge, and McHale were pretty good.
Ainge was important.
But Ainge was no Parish.
re: Stephen A. rant Lakers ‘bunch of white dudes’ is unacceptable – racist much?
Posted by Salviati on 7/2/26 at 12:04 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:You should know better, Chief.
80s Celtics
Sounded like a racist comment to me.
quote:HR might buy that story.quote:my secretary had walked into my office right after I pulled up that tweet. :lol:
Can't post the tweets here but Andy Ngo
WHOOPS!
re: Robert E. Lee claimed his first battlefield victory on this day 164 years ago...
Posted by Salviati on 6/29/26 at 9:39 am to RollTide1987
Lee was good, but he was no Grant.
quote:How does posting the video of the commitment make me an asshat?
Enjoy your 15 minutes asshat.
People asked about the hat fake. I posted the video.
Why are you so angry?
re: Federal judge rules government can't prevent using SNAP to purchase energy drinks and soda
Posted by Salviati on 6/29/26 at 9:11 am to bayouvette
quote:The judge has the right amount of power. And her ruling is correct.
These fed judges have too much power.
The POLICY of limiting SNAP benefits to more nutritious items and prohibiting its use for non-nutritious items is good POLICY.
Even this judge agrees with this good POLICY.
The POLICY was created by agencies. The agencies drafted and promulgated REGULATORY GUIDANCE to put the POLICY into effect.
Agencies, however, are constrained by the language of the STATUTE. Congress enacted the STATUTE that created the SNAP program. The agencies' REGULATORY GUIDANCE concerning the POLICY must comply with Congress's STATUTE.
In this case, the REGULATORY GUIDANCE does not comply with the STATUTE.
That is the Court's ruling. Any other ruling would be judicial activism. Courts are not supposed to rule in favor of POLICY they like. They are supposed to interpret and follow the STATUTE.
For completeness:
The REGULATORY GUIDANCE must comply with the STATUTE.
The STATUTE must comply with the CONSTITUTION.
quote:That's why they use Mel Brooks' jokes instead of their own.quote:90% of men over 60 aren’t funny.
I would bet 90% of American men over 60 could quote 3-4 lines just from his movies being brought up in conversation.

LSU hat fake.
quote:Nearly every settlement provides that each party pays its own fees.
Dominion paid their own legal fees. They didn’t even get legal fees covered in the settlement. What is it you think they got?
The fact that Dominion paid its own legal fees is irrelevant.
re: Dominion dropped its $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against Mike Lindell
Posted by Salviati on 6/26/26 at 7:50 am to wookalar1013
quote:The quote is verifiable and accurate.quote:I’m sure the quote is accurate. The science behind it is not. Unless you don’t understand what “confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt” means, which seems frequent with maga
The quote is verifiable. Do your own GD homework fool!
The science behind it is NOT.
About halfway down this document is the Antrim Michigan Forensics Report performed by Allied Security Operations Group. The Antrim Michigan Forensics Report is the source of the quote.
This article provides a thorough explanation about how and why the Antrim Michigan Forensics Report was created and promoted. The making of a myth
This report is a thorough explanation of what really happened in Antrim Michigan. The Antrim County 2020 Election Incident: An Independent Forensic Investigation
re: Dominion dropped its $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against Mike Lindell
Posted by Salviati on 6/26/26 at 7:17 am to the808bass
quote:Dominion sued Lindell.
Why don’t you explain how it worked here.
The value of that lawsuit is estimated through the analysis of many factors: (1) probability of prevailing, (2) likely judgment amount, (3) the judgement amount that is actually recoverable, and (4) the amount of time until payment of judgment.
Dominion's Probability of Prevailing: Near Certain. The probability of Dominion prevailing against Lindell seems nearly certain. In the Newsmax lawsuit, Judge Davis ruled that Newsmax committed defamation per se against Dominion in each of the 19 alleged statements. Last year in Denver, a jury issued a $2.3 million judgment against Lindell after finding he had defamed a former Dominion director with similar claims of election fraud. Both Fox and Newsmax settled Dominion's cases against them for millions of dollars, far more than nuisance costs. Clearly, both Fox and Newsmax believed Dominion's claims had significant merit.
Likely Judgment Amount: $100+ million Fox agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million to settle Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit. Similarly, Newsmax agreed to pay $67 million to settle Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against it. Eric Coomer, a single individual, received a $2.3 million judgment against Lindell for similar defamation claims. The likely judgment amount of Dominion's claims against Lindell would be $100 million or more.
Judgement Amount that Is Actually Recoverable: $0 While testifying on June 9, 2025, during his Denver defamation trial, Lindell stated that he was millions of dollars in debt due to legal costs, indicating a negative net worth of at least several million dollars as of mid-2025. Thus, it is unlikely that Dominion will recover any amount from Lindell regardless of the stated amount of a court judgment. A $1 billion judgment that is not recoverable is not worth the paper it's printed on.
Amount of Time until Payment of Judgment: 2+ years If Dominion would have proceed to trial against Lindell, it might have been a year or more before the trial was conducted and at least another year until the appeal process was complete.
Thus, when Liberty Vote, founded and operated by former Republican election official Scott Leiendecker, purchased Dominion in October 2025, four months after Lindell testified that he was millions of dollars in debt, the proxy value of Dominion's claims against Lindell were likely little more than $0.
The standard settlement process includes confidentiality, dismissal with prejudice, and each party bears its own costs. I have been involved in the settlement of hundreds of cases. Nearly all of them included a confidentiality clause, the plaintiff's agreement to dismiss with prejudice (which means the plaintiff cannot file the lawsuit again), and a clause that each party will bear its own attorney fees and court costs. The idea of settlement is to put the case and the feud to bed. No talking about the claims, no refiling the lawsuit, and no fighting about how much the attorney's fees are.
re: PETA has gone full retard
Posted by Salviati on 6/25/26 at 12:28 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:Let's not quibble about the classification or cause.
But I’m not a cat hating retard.
Worthless based on probability, prevention probability, and cure.
It's unlikely to happen.
It won't stop it from happening.
It won't make it better if it does happen.
It's unlikely to happen.
It won't stop it from happening.
It won't make it better if it does happen.
I love low IQ downvotes.
quote:
Top companies don’t hire based on coursework they hire based on proof you can operate in real systems and what you can prove in practice under interview conditions. Top companies heavily screen for data structures, arrays, trees, graphs, and algorithms, recursion, dynamic programming, and sorting/searching.
The CS grads that I have interviewed understand concepts taught in class, toy problems, guided labs, but not independent projects that look like real software, and struggle immensely to apply them in a 30–45 minute coding interview, showing a lack of real-world ability. Hiring teams want evidence you can build and ship something with very little ramp time. A candidate needs evidence they can deal with users, databases, APIs, deployment, or real constraints. Without that, entry-level candidates with CS degrees get constantly passed over.

re: Muslim stabs UK cop, cops don't know what to do
Posted by Salviati on 6/25/26 at 11:49 am to real turf fan
quote:If the perp had a knife, and the cops have a two-foot metal baton and pepper spray (see the vid at 0:21 where one cop clearly sprays the perp), why would the cops attempt to tackle the perp from the front? That would be stupid as frick.quote:EXACTLY!
after a bystander took him to the ground.
A good heart of England man did what the cops either didn't know how to OF were trained not to do.
Can I hope they broke every bone in his face and then a dog cam over and urinated on him hitting his blood and contaminating his so-called eternal soul.
The citizen tackled the perp from behind after the perp had been sprayed and while the perp was distracted with the cops. The cops did not have the advantage of surprise.
Popular
0












