Favorite team:Auburn 
Location:ATL
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:919
Registered on:6/19/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Monetizing his office. Very bad look.


This is nothing new. He had foreign guests and their entourages stay at his properties over and over in his first term. Taxpayers are paying for his near constant golf outings, at his courses, now.

Not a bad gig if you can get it, I guess.

re: HSA suggesions

Posted by CharlieTiger on 4/16/25 at 9:39 am
quote:


I have one through an employer but there are no investment options so we opened another one through Fidelity and do a transfer of assets every so often.


Interesting. Your HSA will allow you to move it anywhere you want?

My company uses Optum as the HSA and they have Betterment as the investment vehicle. Betterment is somewhat limited, imo.
quote:

This is a valid concern, but also very limiting if you want to take full advantage of credit card points. Unless someone is using CCs for large business expenses or traveling a ton, the best way to earn points is to get new cards when large bonuses hit, as you did, manage your older cards, and strategically cancel cards when needed.


I get that, but I just don't have the time or patience to play the points game.
quote:

Why would you not keep the Gold and also get a Plat?

Likely missed out on a welcome bonus and the Plat is a horrible daily driver. If you're spending enough to hit the waiver there's likely a lit you can also put on a gold.


We thought about it, but the Gold perks are not great, imo. They have some things like restaurant credits, but they're very limited where you can use them. The annual fee also went up to $325 last year. They compensated by an $84 annual Dunkin' credit, but I could not tell you the last time I've been to a Dunkin. We also already had a gold so would not have gotten any welcome bonus. We did get a big one for platinum. 100k points plus additional points for the first 6 months spend. I think we ended up with about 150k points. Bought two of our four tickets to Italy with that.

The biggest points for gold come from groceries and restaurants. Our main grocery store is a huge "farmers market" about a mile away from us that doesn't take credit cards(only debit). We buy probably 85% of our food there. We also subscribe to a CSA with weekly deliveries from end of April through about Thanksgiving every year. We don't eat out all that much and often cook at home. We also have younger kids so going out to eat can be tedious and now just about twice the cost with them. So, the two biggest reasons to have the card from a points perspective minimally come into play for us. We could definitely get more points from the gold, but I just don't know that they'd outweigh the additional fees of both of us having a gold card.

I also really don't like having more than 2 CC's. We have the Amex and a Visa in case we can't use the Amex. We use that for things like paying for kids afterschool, the kids rec baseball fees, etc. Visa is used more internationally if we're traveling too.
My wife and I switched from Gold to Platinum a few years ago. We both fly a decent bit for work, so the lounge access is nice to have, especially with more Amex lounges starting to pop up. We usually spend enough that we'll have unlimited Delta lounge access, but even if we don't, we can split it between limited Delta access and Amex access. We live in Atlanta and fly Delta pretty much exclusively, so the Amex partnership makes sense. Thought about the Delta Amex, but we like having the flexibility to use points for other things if we want.

We take advantage of enough benefits that it offsets the fees every year. I'm not sweating it if even we miss by $50 or $100, but with the Uber credit, airline credit, hotel credit, digital entertainment credit, clear credit, you're easily at $700+.

The hotel credits are great. We took a spring break trip to Utah last year(Zion and Bryce NP's) and flew in/out of Las Vegas. We got $100 food credit at the Venetian on the front end and $100 spa credit at the Wynn on the backend. Early check ins and late check outs. Upgrades at both locations. Not saying you can't talk your way into that in a place like Vegas without the card, but it makes those things much easier.

There are other things like Gold/Presidents club at Hertz, Gold status at Hilton/Mariott that are nice to have when traveling for work or personal. We don't travel enough for work to have great status with hotels or airlines, so these things come in handy.

re: Braden Smith Article on ESPN

Posted by CharlieTiger on 4/9/25 at 2:29 pm
quote:

My (limited) understanding is that CTE is the physical result of repeated head shots, but CTE can manifest itself through a number of psychological issues. Am I off on that?


Yes, it's caused by repeated head/brain injuries and while I can't speak to the second part, it does seem to manifest itself in a number of ways. Look at some of the former NFL players that were diagnosed after death. Quite a few different manifestations. Seems like the brain essentially just goes haywire.

Mayo clinic on CTE: LINK
quote:

Like Turnpike Troubadours, Black Keys, and some other bands, recently, his team booked venues that were too big, thinking there was larger demand for than there actually was.


Or they're charging too much. I just looked on ticketmaster and probably 1/4 of the seats are left open as of now for a show a little over a month out.

I bought 4 seats on presale for $575 and really had to convince myself it'd be worth it.

re: Braden Smith Article on ESPN

Posted by CharlieTiger on 4/9/25 at 10:04 am
quote:

Also, that Ibogaine stuff seems like a great thing to heal people. I hope they legalize it here for treating PTSD and other addiction/mental health conditions plaguing our country.


Not all that familiar with Ibogaine, but psilocybin research is really showing really great effectiveness for treating those types of issues.

re: Will you pay more?

Posted by CharlieTiger on 4/4/25 at 10:37 am
quote:

I hope we can collectively send the message that we’re willing to pay more to hold these countries accountable


You really think the middle and lower class, who've seen significant inflation over the past few years and are continuing to get squeezed over and over are just going to suck it up and continue to get squeezed even more over the next 2(at a very minimum if tariffs are long term) years?

The dam will break at some point.
quote:

I don’t think we ever bring back making cheap plastic shite mainly because of environmental laws here


Not a bad thing. Do we want smog cities like China and India had/have? People bitch about regulations, but clean air, water, etc is not just some silly left wing thing.

quote:

we can definitely recapture higher end manufacturing if we want. Robots cost the same here or in China. I’d rather things we need be made here.


Don't think anyone would disagree with that, but the idea being sold is all the jobs that manufacturing would bring back, which is just not true given the level of automation that would be used.

quote:

$1 Trillion in manufacturing investment has been announced since Trump took office.


That's great, but what kind of manufacturing? High tech? Cars? Appliances? Low cost goods?

Anything that isn't low cost goods is likely going to have a significantly high level of automation. No one is going to build a factory in the US that is going to be a production line like the 50's and 60's. I think people don't understand that the level of jobs that will be available from a lot of these will be much less than they think.

Also, if tariffs are long term and while these locations are being built, we'll have to import materials(steel, aluminum, etc). If those are still tariffed at high levels, that increases the cost of building. If there's an increase in demand for these materials, that adds even more cost, not to mention the increased cost of labor.

What will companies do to try to decrease opex once these places are built? Reduce labor cost through automation.
quote:

If we took a measured approach and gave reasonable deadlines for clearly delineated policy changes, there would be grumbling, but everyone would get over it.


This can't be said enough.

It's the back and forth haphazard way this has been done that is paralyzing many of my current suppliers because they can't plan when they don't know what to expect. Even with the announcement yesterday, there's still not that much clarity on the products they make in Mexico to be imported here.

Trump may think that chaos and confusion is a great tactic when he's negotiating with someone, but when you use that to implement significant change like this, it's terrible for business.

And if he's truly trying to bring manufacturing back, you can't just throw up barriers and expect people to break ground immediately. It's going to take years for a car factory to be built, so in the meantime, consumers are going to be paying significantly more for pretty much any car out there. We're looking at probably 2 years minimum before any new greenfield site is up and running, so you're going to have continued inflation for the next 2-3 years at least because by and large, these tariffs are going to be passed on the consumer.

And if there is a rush to build, not only are those materials going to cost more due to tariffs now, but the spike in demand for materials and labor is going to make those factories incredibly expensive. And how will these companies look to reduce operating expenses once they're built? Automation, which means less jobs. Not that any new factory wouldn't be using significantly more automation anyway, but those higher costs to build will incentivize them to automate even more.

I'm afraid the "short term pain" is going to be way worse than anyone in favor of these tariffs is leading on.

::plays beach volleyball in jorts::

....Playing with the boys!!!

re: Samples you didn't know were...

Posted by CharlieTiger on 3/27/25 at 2:51 pm
quote:

I once bought a random old record and to my surprise it contained the whistle that was sampled at the beginning of Devil’s Haircut.


Another one for Beck.

LINK

Basically the entire melody for Jackass.

I'd never heard this cover until a few months ago and was like....oh wow. It's instantly recognizable when it kicks in.
quote:

Eh context matters, especially for programs who had recent coaching changes. Here's UF's starting five

Walter Clayton 0* out of high school with 0 P5 offers
Alijah Martin: 0* out of high school with 0 P5 offers
Will Richard: 3* out of high school with 0 P5 offers
Rueben Chinyelu: 4* out of high school with 5 P5 offers, signed with Washington State
Alex Condon: 0* out of Australia, only P5 offer was UF


There's a lot to be said for "late bloomers" getting a chance.

Auburn has a similar makeup. Our top 7 for minutes played this year.

Pettiford is by far the highest ranked player as a recruit we have.

Pettiford - 5* out of high school multiple P5 offers 1 year on the team
Broome - 3* our of high school 0 P5 offers 3 years on the team
Kelly - unranked out of high school 0 P5 offers 1 year on the team
Baker-Mazara - unranked out of high school in the Dominican 0 P5 offers 2 years on the team
Jones - unranked out of high school 0 P5 offers 2 years on the team
Johnson - unranked out of high school 0 P5 offers 2 years on the team
Cardwell - 3* out of high school. 5 P5 offers. 5 years on the team

While it's not ideal, is this any worse than the one and done situations from the past 10-15 years? Overall it seems like guys are staying in college longer at this point.

re: Montverde Academy

Posted by CharlieTiger on 3/25/25 at 2:08 pm
quote:

I don't know but their 2019 roster had 5 starters go to the NBA. Cade Cunningham, Scottie Barnes, Moses Moody, Caleb Houstan, and Day'Ron Sharpe.


2023 had Cooper Flagg(Duke), Liam McNeely(Uconn), Derik Queen(Maryland(and yes he walked)), Asa Newell(uga) and Robert Wright(Baylor). All in the top 28 composite on 247.
quote:

quote:
I choose not to escrow. I pay my property taxes and insurance annually.


That is my recommendation to anyone where it is not required by your mortgage company


I've fought it but they won't let me get out of it. We refinanced in 2021 to 3.25 and I guess the loan was still large enough where they said it had to be escrowed.

Our property taxes have gone up year over year for the last few years, but not significantly. They usually send us the notice in June for the escrow adjustment in July, but they adjusted it in March of this year out of nowhere. It's up over $500/month because they're assuming our property tax will hit a certain level. Our city doesn't send property taxes for the year until April 1st and the increase over the last few years doesn't come close to justifying this increase. We're in a unique area where we pay pretty much all property taxes to our city and not our county. The county makes the home value assessment and the city uses that to calculate the property taxes. We have our own, very good school system, which a significant portion of our taxes go to.

I fought it over the phone with them for probably an hour and just gave up. They said they'll re-asses in June when they normally do and will credit back anything that's over what the account needs. That's fine, but needless to say, I'm not happy about this and am looking at any way to get out of escrow, but not sure they'll let me.
Butterfinger Blizzards are still the best though.

I only eat Butterfingers around Halloween, so I guess I never really noticed the difference. My kids have to pay me the Butterfinger tax before they can eat any of their candy(or at least what they haven't managed to shove in their mouth before they get home).
quote:

How does having an "LGTBQRSTUV+ outreach liaison" a benefit to the national park system?


I don't know the demographics of NP visitors, but it's likely to try to get more LGBTQetc people interested in visiting, enjoying and feeling like they belong at the parks. Seems pretty self explanatory and I don't really think that's a bad thing.

Given the ROI for the park system and the avg pay for those jobs being some of the lowest in all of the federal govt, it doesn't make sense as to why these jobs are being targeted. I'm very skeptical that all those that got fired were hired under the premise of them being a "DEI" job. It's not like doge hasn't fired swaths of people inadvertently only to hire them back when they realized they did it in error. Scapegoating them as DEI seems like the easy way out.

This all goes back to my premise that much of what doge has done so far has been haphazard and sloppy, in my opinion. It seemed as though it was more of a performance than truly being strategic and weeding out actual inefficiency.
quote:

But your quote, although "technically" accurate, fails to mention that every one of those employees were specifically DEI employees.


In this situation, I couldn't care less what kind of employees they are. Just cutting jobs to cut jobs is a poor decision, imo. It's not doing anything to cut waste, imo. Go after what is truly not efficient and wasteful.

It will cost more to go through the process of finding and hiring replacements, if they end up doing that, then just keeping them on the payroll. That is the definition of wasteful and inefficient regardless of how you feel about those hires.