Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:5093
Registered on:6/4/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
They would have been fine with a trade to NY, Milwaukee, and a few other places. Legitimately, as I can tell you they were talking to some other teams trying to convince them to offer big packages to get him out. So, how does that fit with your "Doing it for Lebron" theory? Rich Paul was on the phone with the Clippers and Knicks A LOT, getting them to call Dell. And Knicks offered some monster packages.

I mean no offense by this, but you guys simply don't know what you are talking about. You grabbed on to some narratives that made sense to you, but I can tell you for a fact they just aren't true.

But I am probably a fraud who doesn't know the behind the scenes stuff and your theories are better, so I will shut up
They took their shot, probably overvaluing the Lakers assets, and missed.

I mean, even the smartest in the media thought the Lakers "all in" package couldn't be trumped. That it was better to take it than risk the distraction that came with AD playing out the rest of the season, etc

Look, I won't convince any of you. Don't care. If and when it plays out, you guys will talk yourselves into it being the best course of action. I have seen it enough times. All I gotta do is give it time and the seeds I have planted combined with people wanting to be optimistic will sprout.
And what do you know about them other than the takes you have heard from witty Twitter people?

I know, for instance, Griffin really respects Rich Paul. Not just when he speaks in public, but behind the scenes. I know Rich Paul has done some things for clients that has actually gone against what is best for Lebron. So, he doesn't just do everything with Lebron in mind.

I just don't see how you guys all acknowledge how much better the franchise is now, yet can't seem to wrap your head around how bad AD should've wanted out, no matter what it took. You must be blocked by emotion because there is no logical connection you can make between those points

re: Trajan Langdon named new GM

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 11:12 am to
Bad franchise make the playoffs all the time. Get lucky every once in a while because the players overcome the front office. I think of the Arizona Cardinals that one magical year with Warner, for instance.

But only good franchises have sustainability. The foundation of this franchise was garbage. Utter garbage. The fact that they had one awesome 10 game win streak and then got an ideal playoff matchup one year and happened to win says nothing about the foundation.
I don't get the connection between your first paragraph and 2nd

Basically, in your first you acknowledge how bad the organization used to be and how great it is now. And then in the second, paint Klutch as this villain with no logic

They wanted to get him out of here BECAUSE the organization was crap. Which you guys all now realize after seeing what it could be with an owner who actually focuses on it.

Nothing Klutch did was wrong IMO if their goal is to get their client away from a crappy franchise while he is in their prime. And it was a crappy franchise.

I don't get how people don't see this clearly yet. They know all the pieces but don't connect them properly. I am guessing it is because emotion is involved

re: Trajan Langdon named new GM

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 10:58 am to
Because that guy is a fraud ;)

re: Trajan Langdon named new GM

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 10:50 am to
It's Gayle.

Every POBO in the world would want an amazing staff. Gayle realized after she calmed down from The Jump dunking on us that it is necessary. I give her all the credit for looking in the mirror and saying, "Why aren't we giving this franchise the attention and resources we give the Saints?"

And she changed. Just in time
Man, you just getting greedy now.

That said, there are still some analytics and scouting department hires coming. Griffin is building a top notch staff that will compete with any in the league

I would say they were in the 23-26 range the last 5 years or so and will easily be top 6 moving forward

re: Trajan Langdon named new GM

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 10:45 am to
It is a lot like the D Rob situation and the LeBron leaving Cleveland first time situation.

Without either of those things happening, which bummed the fan base out a lot at the time, a title would have never been possible

re: Trajan Langdon named new GM

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 10:40 am to
I was honestly shocked by how quickly some people guessed it

Gonna have to make the clues harder moving forward :cheers:

re: Trajan Langdon named new GM

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 10:36 am to
39.6% career from 3

13.6 points per 36 minutes

I like it :lol:
Congrats to those of you who figured it out.

I was truly impressed :cheers:
I honestly couldn't care less about swaying you guys. I am here to provide insight and balance to the conversation. I don't expect 98% of people to be open minded enough to live in the gray. But for those that are, I give them some more nuanced things to consider.
Is Pascal Siakam's career being hurt by all this will Kawhi or won't he stuff?

Again, you guys are assuming there will be drama and a bad, manipulative Klutch, an uninterested AD with one foot out the door, etc

You guys don't give even the smallest bit of consideration to an AD situation that is closer to Kawhi or Paul George - where he is all in this season and hoping to win big and be won over by a franchise that is finally doing things right.

I am ready for this to all just play out. I just like to explore the gray a little more than most. My suggestion for all of you -- Watch More than an Athlete with an open mind and see if you come away from that thinking Klutch is this big, evil crew that wouldn't be open to AD staying in NOLA if they truly had turned stuff around.
I think AD can make decisions for himself. But if all the people in your life, including the most important ones, tell you that you need to get out of something, it is hard not to listen.

But I keep coming back to Rich Paul, AD, and his inner circle being soured on Demps and the Pels ownerships buy in version from December. If Gayle was this focused on the franchise then and Griffin was in place, I don't think the mess would have happened.

I don't believe AD and Rich Paul are these evil geniuses and schemers who do everything at Lebron's whim. I think Rich Paul saw an all time great player being wasted by a franchise that had a terrible foundation and was 3rd priority towards the ownership. AD's inner circle saw this too. They met in September and laid out all the options - one of which being, 'If this shite don't change soon, I will get your son out of there"

Now, the way it was handled wasn't ideal but I get it from their perspective. As I have been telling you guys for years, the franchise was a joke. It isn't any more, so I am good with a clean slate for both sides if he is too
I don't think its that cut and dry. Unfortunately, at fans, we will only see the major results coming out of that meeting. Either he will sign the contract or opt in or nothing.

But I think a lot of sincere words and promises can be said in that meeting that could make me feel comfortable going into the season with AD on my roster and no extension signed yet.

I will say this -- It is not AD or Rich Paul I am worried about. There is another figure that I think is most important for Griffin to win over. If he is open minded, I would feel good about AD staying. If not, I ship out AD in June.

The Historical Argument for Keeping AD

Posted by Crewz on 5/19/19 at 8:11 am
In the last 35 years, only two franchises have gotten the #1 pick a won a title with that guy.

And in both situations, they had another #1 pick who was taken years before and was in his prime, but some weird shite happened

Spurs - Robinson and Duncan
Cavs - LBJ and Kyrie

You need a lot of top tier talent and a lot of luck to win it all in this league. Pels situation, in some ways, mirror both of these historical precedents. Might be foolish to trade AD if the end goal is a ring. #1 picks don't seem to win it all with the team that drafted them otherwise. The last one before that who did was Hakeem, who was taken first in the pre-lotto era.
I like the idea of Patrick Beverly a lot. Darren Collison if he comes cheap. Satoransky would be a nice 20-25mpg guard who can push the pace and hit the 3.

On the wing, I'd be curious if I could take Kyle Anderson off Memphis's hands if they are looking to dump some money. I also might take a flyer on Jake Layman. Garrett Temple cheap. Josh Richardson would be near ideal, but I don't know how we could get him. Danny Green or T Ross if we spend a little bit more money

re: Bojan Bogdanovic

Posted by Crewz on 5/18/19 at 3:01 pm to
You guys need to drastically adjust your expectations for what some of these FA's will get. Bogan will get closer to 25 than 15

re: Is getting Brogdon realistic ?

Posted by Crewz on 5/18/19 at 10:37 am to
It's true though. Marc Gasol is overpaid. So is Serge Ibaka. Middleton will be starting next year. Regular season Iggy is vastly overpaid, Milsap is overpaid

But those teams don't regret any of those deals. They regret Tony Snell and Norman Powell. Portland regrets Meyers Leonard, and on and on and on

If you KNOW a guy can be a core piece, it's hard to overpay him to an extent he hurts your ability to be great. But the guy who makes real money that can't see the court when it matters - that kills you.