Favorite team:USA 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:29505
Registered on:4/10/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Josh Pate is one of the best at covering CFB. Pretty wild take especially this early but the man is no dumbass.


Pate was solid before he got sponsors. He wasn't a bad watch at all back in the day.

After he started getting real money flowing in he became another hot take machine.
quote:

Net debt less than 3x EBITDA and less than 20% of EV is some mortgage



Again, United taking debt isn't the main point. The issue is that they can do that AND operate like a top tier club while other clubs don't have that luxury. United can do shitty business and not have an issue.

Newcastle's owners could buy United today and sell them for a penny tomorrow and laugh about it but due to PSR they have to sell players to meet regulations.
quote:

They skipped over 8, which would have been perfect.



I go back and forth on this but I think this is the way. On one hand I like 12 for the byes because it rewards success but with the committee just chasing vibes each season it doesn't work well. The autobids and shite kind of hurt this too.

If they went with a BCS style ranking maybe I'd like 12 more but without that 8 is probably right.
quote:

Both actions just give the Glazers more cash now and less at the club’s sale. As long as the actions don’t threaten the club with insolvency (they’re nowhere close) it makes no difference to the health of the club. It’s merely an advance of the owners’ sale windfall


PSR was implemented to prevent clubs from becoming insolvent. Is it going to happen with United? No. They're too big to fail. It is still an artificial barrier to success for smaller clubs. United, Liverpool, Arsenal, and Chelsea are big enough (or juiced enough) prior to the rules being implemented to where the rules have zero impact on their operations. Villa, City, and Newcastle's owners could write a check for all those clubs right now. Everton isn't far behind. Yet those clubs, bar City for now, constantly have to sell their best players to meet the regulations.

quote:

I’m glad you correctly recognize this is AOK, many people with no understanding of how these things work usually aggressively and delusionally argue otherwise



I understand you're being a smartass here but "advance on the sale's windfall" is mortgaging the future. Still probably doesn't effect United but that's the point. The historical powers can do that, other clubs can't. PSR rules are to prevent debt and insolvency. Pumping money into a club is the opposite of that. Could Mansour and the other owners get bored and quit tomorrow? Sure, but odds are they won't. If they're willing to pump a billion into the club I don't see them just waking up and saying, "yeah frick this I'll let it go bankrupt."


The entire system is anti-competitive.
quote:

1. the club was told in june they were guilty. they then went out and spent 540 million pounds on transfers, including three 100+ million pound transfers. amazing



Where we getting the 540? Most I'm seeing is 525M euro, which is significantly less in pounds. They also brought in a shite load in sales. Net is roughly 190M.

quote:

2. when you look at 2009-2018 their revenue went up each season through illegal means by over 100million pounds. After the line was drawn at 2018 and the investigation was defined they did not have a significant revenue drop and revenue continued to grow. When they were alledgedly playing by the rules and stopped injecting 100million pounds into their revenue reporting.


For one this assumes the Etihad deal was only 11M/year those years which is laughably low even by fair market standards. I get that that's what the report says but come on. The Nike deal was reported to be 20M/year towards the end and then they swapped to Puma for 65M/year in 19. Maybe they juiced it after then but the actual reported numbers from non ADUG affiliates went way up and I'd think they'd be more cautious being under the microscope at that point.

quote:

Haaland officially cost 50million pounds, but there are rumors of 200million more in the shadows. is that deal also going to be investigated?



This is silly. He had a release clause and City met it. Maybe other clubs met it, maybe they exceeded it. At the end of the day as long as the clause was met Haaland could move wherever he wanted. He grew up a City fan, his dad played there, and he was busted posting on City forums. Maybe they paid a shite load of agent fees or signing bonuses but that happens with every single big transfer. Dortmund had a contract that said he could leave for X amount. They were paid X amount.

quote:

ETA BVB rejected 75million from ManU for Haaland and 130million plus a player from CFC but took 50million from MC


Haaland was never going to fricking United. Ever. That ship sailed in 2001. Chelsea IDK. Again, you can't say "Dortmund rejected it" because it wasn't their choice. If they got the release clause then Haaland could go wherever he wanted. If City got Kane in 21 then maybe Haaland goes to Chelsea in 22.

re: Red Sox are you kidding me?

Posted by Srbtiger06 on 9/30/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Thinks Chris Hansen is the bad guy.



I mean OP has a point. Why are they prancing around like Richard fricking Simmons when they're down this much in the 7th?

re: Cam's fam receiving threats

Posted by Srbtiger06 on 9/30/26 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

I guess it's possible, but it seems like this has become a frequent go-to when someone is struggling or a player/league gets a big PR black eye for doing something dumb.



It really does seem like a cop out at this point and they never really come to anything.

If there was a thing where athletes were actually being killed or even attacked then sure, I might buy it. CowboyDawg69 on twitter saying "I hope you die" isn't really a threat. These guys need to quit being pussies.
frick it. At this point just split and make it NFL lite. They've ruined the sport already might as well go ahead and kill it off entirely.
quote:

Again Landry only cares about LSU.



This is hilarious considering how many people said he was going to frick LSU because he liked ULL and based his transition team in Lafayette.
quote:

Yea. I’m sure it was isolated to the accounting dept and not spread throughout the entire leadership and culture of the club.



They've been under the microscope for the better part of a decade at this point and nothing has popped up other than financials.

quote:

Check in to reality some time mate.

quote:

So you think all the other clubs were ok with approving the rules because they want to protect Man U and Liverpool?



They did it because they saw Chelsea and City just invest and win and didn't want fans asking questions of the owners IMO. No different than fans bitching about the Pirates or A's. Clubs are an asset for them.

quote:

Clubs can grow organically. It’s just harder. And MC could have cheated a little less obviously



Yeah and turn out like Everton, Villa, and Newcastle where they have a little success and then have to turn around and sell your best players to the big clubs to comply with the bullshite rules.

Meanwhile you watch the Glazers rape and pillage the most successful club in the country and saddle them with debt and it's AOK.
quote:

This is the biggest scandal and blatant fraud in Premier League history so yes its generational.


They cooked the books so they could invest and spend at the same levels as the big clubs. It isn't exactly Calciopoli. They broke the rules sure but it was in the accounting department.
quote:

Etihad is considering suing the EPL



I have no idea why they would but it is odd they're saying Mansour juiced the books but didn't call in Etihad. How did they arrive at these numbers without looking at Etihad's books? CAS looked at them and said they were on the up and up.

I have no doubt there was some shady shite but the numbers they're throwing out seem too absurd to be true...especially without looking at Etihad's (and I'm assuming here ADUG's) books.
quote:

I’m not a City fan, but clearly the Premier League version of FFP protects the three red teams. All of it was originally started to protect Real Madrid from the new wave of Middle East owners. There are ways to protect against a City or PSG spending billions more than everyone without tying everything to current profits and losses. Now the decades established clubs have a perpetual advantage that won’t ever be overcome.


If you want "fair play" then institute a cap. You can't do that because European law doesn't allow it and the people the same people lashing out at City are against billionaires pocketing money from the clubs they own.
quote:

Certainly not Everton.


Nope but they should be able to do what they want. Why does Everton have to sell players? Forest? Newcastle? Because of FFP. The rules are dogshit and prevent investment. I want Everton to be able to invest and secure their future. Same with every other club in the league that has ambition.

Instead we have clubs qualifying for champions league and having to sell players to comply with the dog shite rules.

quote:

Which club(s) is/are the right club(s)?


United, arsenal, Liverpool. They're OKed for interest fee loans. United got more COVID relief money than everyone else combined. Liverpool just rolled with Countinho money forever (they did do this and are the biggest club with a gripe against city but still).

The verdict today literally was "city invested beyond their means". We didn't spend more then other clubs. We didn't match fix like Juve. We didn't just buy a team. The ruling just said we invested more than the rules allowed. The rules are shite. We broke them and I fully accept whatever comes our way, but it's a massive dog and pony show.
quote:

Arguing that Arsenal or any other team has done anything approaching what city has done is pure cope.



Just interest free loans from the shareholders. Totally don't apply to PSR rules and they're grandfathered in. Again, we're approving debt to comply with rules to "prevent clubs from amassing debt."

quote:

Sheikhs hate accountability.



Again, defend Kroenke. This a zero sum race to the bottom. The rules are bullshite and are constantly OK to skirt as long as you're the right club.

re: It was their last hope

Posted by Srbtiger06 on 9/29/26 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

I've not heard you complaining about those higher egg prices, though.


Because some BS happened while Biden what President and it ended shortly after Trump took office. Wasn't necessarily Biden's fault. Trump didn't really do anything there either.

quote:

And those squeezed hardest for diesel have been owners of suburban monsters and owner operators, who often are hit the hardest without a way to pass that increased cost along.



And those that ship things via diesel powered trucks...which is just about everything.

quote:

I mentioned over the weekend paying $4.15/gal to fill-up. I figure it cost me about $.50 / day more. And I (personally) am willing to pay much more if it helped Bessent's anaconda tighten further.


True believer. Nothing wrong with your conviction but it is hammering everyone else.
quote:

sucks because i really like this current roster



I've seen anything from 12 weeks to 2.5 years for the appeal process. Hopefully this drags out because this squad is built for the future.

I hate it but it is what it is at this point. Khaldoon keeps screaming "irrefutable evidence" but at some point I need to see something.

I almost don't care about this shite at this point. I was following the squad with Goater when I couldn't watch and just prayed for quick updates on matches pre-streaming. Accounting isn't the game. I just wanna see us play again.
quote:

He got a lot of hate for getting popular so fast.


He got a lot of hate because he ripped his act from a guy that ripped his act (well I might add) from another guy. He was never funny.
quote:


You got here because oil sheiks do not and never have given a single flying frick about the rules. I’ve been to the UAE and the whole culture there is trash.


Yeah but I'm not going to pretend your billionaires are somehow more ethical than ours. It's a game of capitalism at this point. They looked for an edge and exploited the frick out of a loophole they thought they found.

Unless you want to argue that Stan Kroenke has some sort of built in moral capital then I'm here for it.
Yeah we're fricked :lol:


In all honesty though, idk how they got here. This apparently started 17 years ago. UEFA lost their case and it wasn't solely due to being time barred if you read the entire decision. Deloitte, a big 4, somehow didn't find it but the premier league did?

Getting to nuts and bolts of it, it's still hard to wrap my mind around. The argument is that Mansour bought the club via Abu Dhabi United. Various interests in UAE bought into the club through sponsorships. These same entities received government grants for tourism. The argument is these grants were solely used to fund City sponsorships.

On one hand it's dodgy at absolute best. On the other hand you can't tell me the entire City deal was only worth 11M from 2011-2018. I'll accept it's probably juiced but 11M/year for shirt/stadium/campus sponsor? Nah.

There's a ton of questionable deals and financing in the PL and there's zero chance this is only a City exclusive deal.

I've said from the start of we're guilty then whatever but be realistic. The rules are absolute horse shite but we agreed to them. That said, a billion fricking pounds after reading the ruling also seems like a stretch.

Idk. Khaldoon and Co. seem confident so we'll see going forward. At this point I'd be fine shooting him and Ferran into the sun just to be done with it.