tigerwave168

Very sure.

LINK

If he was running 6.39 in the 60, he would be #1 on the NCAA Indoor Track and Field performance list by more than a tenth of a second which isn't very likely. Kid is still one heck of an athlete though.

It's a good way to find tidbits on recruiting for people who don't have access to insider information. Simply thought it was an interesting thing to say.

THEE MACK TRUCK
?@DaylonMack
LSU got the #1 defense in the SEC>>>>

We're his flavor of the week I suppose.

I happened to find this post amusing. An upvote for you, sir. :lol:

I thought the same thing as well. I guess I'm frustrated with the fact that we essentially fixed the defense with personnel changes and if we aren't doing the same with the offense, then we have to change the scheme (I know, join the club).

Last night's loss has little to do with Anthony Jenning being terrible, LF not getting carries, the OL being a mess.

The game plan had absolutely no creativity. How can any team, regardless of the running backs, run when the line gets absolutely zero push? At halftime, how can a staff look at the offensive output and suddenly think the opposing defense will fare any differently using the same exact formations?

At halftime, it's not about putting Harris in. He wouldn't have been put in a position to succeed with no creativity.

Starting the 3rd quarter, there's no reason not to go into the shotgun with a few 3/4 wide receiver sets (for example). Your offensive output can't possibly get any worse. Give them a look they haven't seen very often on film. The drive where Jennings fumbled: we moved the ball with relative success. Why? Because we attempted to give them a different formation. Arkansas had 10 days to prepare for this game. They weren't going to be confused by our offensive sets used for the Alabama/Ole Miss games. It didn't work in those games either. It just allowed us to stay in those games.

Solid offenses need versatility in their formations/pre-snap looks. Our lack of offensive output has nothing to do with run/pass ratios. We can still run the ball effectively if we mix up formations. I'm not suggesting we switch to the spread, completely abandon what we've done, etc. I'm simply suggesting a mix-up of pre-snap looks, not always running on first down, getting backs involved in the passing game, just to name a few.

Most LSU fans understand QB problem isn't our only problem.

There's not much LSU can do to fix it's D-line/O-line problems from a personnel standpoint but we can hope the units continue to grow together and get better. Strong QB play can make up for many other deficiencies on the field. The QB play can be CHANGED. We can go from a game manager to someone who at least has potential. Not saying Brandon Harris is going to come in and light up the SEC in his first start on the road, but he gives us more of a chance on offense than Anthony Jennings can at this point in time.

There's your reasons why LSU fans talk about it so much.

The QB play isn't about who does/doesn't make mistakes. There hasn't been a single game this year that Jennings showed he can win you a game or provide big plays. Even in the Wisconsin game, if it wasn't for Diarse willing himself to the endzone, we lose that game. At some point, the offense can't simply be a unit that doesn't turn the ball over. Seems obvious, but they have to score points. Harris played with the same o-line Jennings did. It doesn't matter that it was against a 3 man rush or against backups, etc. Miss State's backups were better than any of the 3 opponents we faced prior to the game. Harris proved he can move the ball up the field.

I'm not delusional enough to think Harris won't make freshman mistakes during the year if he starts. But he also gives us a chance to make plays that Jennings hasn't proven he can make.

Agreed it's tough to tell outside the tourist areas here in NOLA. But I see a decent amount of Ole Miss folks so I'd probably put them somewhere behind Bama in terms of fan base here.

Couldn't agree more. Also, I feel like Ego and AJ didn't give consistent EFFORT and neither lived up to their expectations.

Experienced doesn't always mean better. Example: we had experienced corners last year that were displaced by 2 true freshmen (very talented freshmen). I think this year's defense will be significantly better than last years. By how much, only time will tell.