paper tiger
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | acadiana |
| Biography: | na |
| Interests: | football, hunting, reading, writing, golf |
| Occupation: | na |
| Number of Posts: | 1199 |
| Registered on: | 2/2/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Cool fact about Frank Wilson
Posted by paper tiger on 10/27/25 at 12:24 pm
Duh me. Deleted. lol
We find out if we are good next week…
Posted by paper tiger on 9/21/25 at 8:00 pm
The question for all the pollsters about LSU is whether LSU is that good, or whether Florida andClemson just suck. Having watched Clemson and Florida play this week, it seems a fair question.
LSU can make the debate moot this week. If LSU beats Ole Miss at Oxford, Few will argue that LSU is not a good team. Kiffin has transformed Ole Miss to a contender. Ole Miss is a tough out.
If LSU loses at Oxford, they probably are over rated as #3 team in the country. Ole miss is good, but not special. How are going to beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa and Oklahoma in Norman if you can’t beat Ole Miss in Oxford?
That said, the Clemson and Florida wins give LSU a nice cushion. LSU has a tough schedule. A two loss LSU team is likely a shoe in for a playoff spot. Ole Miss is not a must win game. But if you beat them in Oxford then your chances to make the playoffs go way up.
LSU can make the debate moot this week. If LSU beats Ole Miss at Oxford, Few will argue that LSU is not a good team. Kiffin has transformed Ole Miss to a contender. Ole Miss is a tough out.
If LSU loses at Oxford, they probably are over rated as #3 team in the country. Ole miss is good, but not special. How are going to beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa and Oklahoma in Norman if you can’t beat Ole Miss in Oxford?
That said, the Clemson and Florida wins give LSU a nice cushion. LSU has a tough schedule. A two loss LSU team is likely a shoe in for a playoff spot. Ole Miss is not a must win game. But if you beat them in Oxford then your chances to make the playoffs go way up.
Don’t the three Week’s brothers remind you of…..
Posted by paper tiger on 9/14/25 at 8:01 pm
The three Hanson brothers in Slapshot? Can someone post an image of those guys? I dont know how to attach an image, I’m too old I guess. Lol. I do know that the Hanson brothers and the Weeks brothers both are like three brother wrecking crews, born to create havoc, born to tackle.
Seriously, how crazy is it that LSU played three different brothers, all linebackers, in the same game in a big SEC contest against Florida. If there is a 4th Weeks brother, I’m offering him sight unseen.
Seriously, how crazy is it that LSU played three different brothers, all linebackers, in the same game in a big SEC contest against Florida. If there is a 4th Weeks brother, I’m offering him sight unseen.
re: WAFB: JT Lindsey turns himself in on accessory charge
Posted by paper tiger on 8/8/25 at 8:03 pm to PP7 for heisman
To be fair, unless they have text message evidence showing that Lindsey was made aware of their situation, he'll walk from this pretty easily. Just so fricking dumb regardless.
Having tried a dozen or more homicide cases, this case sounds a lot more potentially worrisome to me. If Lindsey was housing murder suspects for any period of time, then proving Lindsey knew they were wanted might not be all that hard to prove. People who do stuff like this are almost always knuckleheads who have thought nothing much through and inevitably leave a trail of incriminating crumbs that even Hansel and Gretel could follow.
That said, an accessory is way different than a principal. Accessory charges can be hard to convict if any jurors see the accessory as more of a loyal guy who will not rat out his pals than as an accomplice to a crime.
But if they can prove Lindsey housed guys he knew were wanted for murder, thats a felony. I dont see Lindsey playing at LSU with a felony conviction.
I am hoping he did not know these guys were wanted and/or that they cannot prove it. You just cannot rule out, with so little information reported, that the prosecution may not already have compelling evidence of an accessory crime.
But anyway, anyone who has not seen the police report, including me, and who thinks Lindsey did something wrong or not, is just guessing at this time. I hope the best for Lindsey and that he was unaware his friends were wanted. If he did not know they were wanted, then there is no crime.
If he did know, however, and was just being a loyal friend, then he may have a steep price to pay. I get being a loyal friend. But that can never outweigh the rights of the victim’s family to have the killer tried, not to mention the fact these guys might kill someone else along the way. Once people cross the kill somebody line, its way, way more easier to kill the next guy.
Having tried a dozen or more homicide cases, this case sounds a lot more potentially worrisome to me. If Lindsey was housing murder suspects for any period of time, then proving Lindsey knew they were wanted might not be all that hard to prove. People who do stuff like this are almost always knuckleheads who have thought nothing much through and inevitably leave a trail of incriminating crumbs that even Hansel and Gretel could follow.
That said, an accessory is way different than a principal. Accessory charges can be hard to convict if any jurors see the accessory as more of a loyal guy who will not rat out his pals than as an accomplice to a crime.
But if they can prove Lindsey housed guys he knew were wanted for murder, thats a felony. I dont see Lindsey playing at LSU with a felony conviction.
I am hoping he did not know these guys were wanted and/or that they cannot prove it. You just cannot rule out, with so little information reported, that the prosecution may not already have compelling evidence of an accessory crime.
But anyway, anyone who has not seen the police report, including me, and who thinks Lindsey did something wrong or not, is just guessing at this time. I hope the best for Lindsey and that he was unaware his friends were wanted. If he did not know they were wanted, then there is no crime.
If he did know, however, and was just being a loyal friend, then he may have a steep price to pay. I get being a loyal friend. But that can never outweigh the rights of the victim’s family to have the killer tried, not to mention the fact these guys might kill someone else along the way. Once people cross the kill somebody line, its way, way more easier to kill the next guy.
re: The mood around Deuce Geralds and Jase Matthews remains positive
Posted by paper tiger on 7/29/25 at 6:34 pm to Phillytiger9
If I had to take only one, give me Geralds. This is no knock on Matthews, he would be a great get for LSU.
It just seems like in recent years that the need at defensive tackle for LSU has been greater than the need at receiver. LSU is a wide receiver factory for the NFL now and maybe that’s why so many receivers want to come to LSU.
Getting Lamar and Geralds in the same class could be a game changer for LSU’s defense in a couple of years. Lamar and Geralds have elite athleticism for playing inside. Quarterbacks hate inside pressure.
I’m hoping for both. Getting Matthews would be great, I’m really happy to learn Geralds is in play. Big boys with quick feet are hard to come by. If I had to choose among a great safety, great corner, great lb, great de or a great dt, all things being equal, give me a tackle who can stop the run or rush the qb with equal skill.
It just seems like in recent years that the need at defensive tackle for LSU has been greater than the need at receiver. LSU is a wide receiver factory for the NFL now and maybe that’s why so many receivers want to come to LSU.
Getting Lamar and Geralds in the same class could be a game changer for LSU’s defense in a couple of years. Lamar and Geralds have elite athleticism for playing inside. Quarterbacks hate inside pressure.
I’m hoping for both. Getting Matthews would be great, I’m really happy to learn Geralds is in play. Big boys with quick feet are hard to come by. If I had to choose among a great safety, great corner, great lb, great de or a great dt, all things being equal, give me a tackle who can stop the run or rush the qb with equal skill.
re: Ben says he is healing up
Posted by paper tiger on 7/21/25 at 8:21 am to tigerskin
quote:Was wondering if he was pushed.
but the Good Lord certainly had a hand in this
Lol. Just kidding, I’m glad the big guy is doing well too.
re: LSUs under hyped running back room and Harlem Berry flying under the radar.
Posted by paper tiger on 7/12/25 at 11:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
There are plenty of great RBs that don’t run a 4.3
In fact, just about all of them. I don’t really care that much about speed at RB.
Sorry, but that seems a really dumb thing to say. Speed is an important and objective metric at running back and at every position in football and most all other sports.
Speed is not the only metric and some players without elite speed are still very good. But if I get a step on you, and I’m faster than you, you can be smarter than me, stronger than me, take the best angle, have more experience than me, on and on, you still ain’t catching me because I’m faster than you.
Being fast is not the end all. But you might be the only person who has any any understanding of football, who doesn’t care about speed.
The people who for their living evaluate high school football players appear to disagree with you that speed hardly matters. They ranked Berry highest rb of the 2025 class. I bet speed mattered to them. What Berry apparently brings to the table is that he has great speed and great natural instincts.
What’s your point? You dont think it’s okay to be excited about having the hiighest ranked and fastest rb in your recruiting class favored speed into the equation?
re: LSUs under hyped running back room and Harlem Berry flying under the radar.
Posted by paper tiger on 7/12/25 at 9:40 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Berry can be smaller, he just has to learn how to shock defenses Witt his speed vertically, like say Chris Johnson or jamyr Gibbs or even bush when he finally learned he couldn’t just run sideways in the nfl. Berry playing in 1A built some habits that will have to be re-trained, otherwise is just a situational gadget back
Berry was reported as being the fastest high school running back in the country in his class. He’s faster than any 5A player in the whole country and the number one rated running back in the whole nation in the 2025 class. Berry’s level of competition has zero to do with his elite speed.
How good he will be, no one can say. What we do know is that virtually every recruiting site totally disagrees with your assessment he needs to learn stuff or be a situational back. Is there some other running back in the country in the 2025 class you would rather have than Berry?
re: LSUs under hyped running back room and Harlem Berry flying under the radar.
Posted by paper tiger on 7/12/25 at 8:18 pm to thumperpait
quote:
Reggie Bush wasn't that big either but made people look stupid. And that's who a lot of experts comped him to
I had not heard that, but insofar as a combination of speed and moves, that’s a great comparison. Bush wasnt as slight of build as Berry. I think the only question mark Berry has is his SEC ready physicality.
I was trying to think who Berry reminds me of and, betraying my age, the butter smooth way he changes direction reminded me of Gayle Sayers. Lol
LSUs under hyped running back room and Harlem Berry flying under the radar.
Posted by paper tiger on 7/12/25 at 7:09 pm
Most of the chatter about LSUs 2025 offense is about Nussmeier and a very deep and talented receiving group. What makes for a great passing game, aside from an offensive line, is the running game.
I read some article about freshman who might contribute this year and saw Harlem Berry on the list. That’s an obvious choice, Berry was a top rated running back in his class. But he doesn’t come in with near the hype Fournette did. Fournette came in with a sec ready frame and speed, if not NFL ready. I knew Berry was good, I guess I just figured at 5’10”, 174 pounds, he might have to sit behind Durham and Jackson a year while he develops.
Just to see why Berry is supposedly so good, I pulled up a highlight reel of his and watched it for the first time just now. I linked to it below. Holy crap. Berry is special.
I know, everyone looks good on a highlight reel, even better if they are playing against small schools. Berry is the fastest back in his class, thats an objective measurable. But lots of kids are fast and thats not what stood out to me on his tape. Berry is almost impossible to tackle in the open field. One move he has thats crazy good his stutter step with sudden deceleration and just as sudden acceleration Just as the tackler slows in reaction to the move, Berry accelerates by the tackler in a flash. And it’s not just the stutter step he has, Berry changes direction on a dime. He’s one of those backs that create holes in the line where there are none by juking guys out of their jockstraps.
Durham had a great season last year. Most publications have Durham as the second best rb in the SEC headed into the 2025 season, only Wisner from Texas is ranked higher. Kaleb Jackson is a monster in the weight room, but how that translates to the field is an unknown. It would be great, at a minimum, if he could be a third or fourth and one guy that pushes the pile. Then you have JT Lindsey, a top ten back in the 2025 class, who also has elite speed.
I’m mostly excited about Durham and Berry. Durham looks more physically ready for the SEC than Berry. And Durham also has great speed and change of direction. I didn’t see much playing time for Berry, just based on his size. His tape changed my mind. This could be a really special running back room to go along with a Heisman hopeful qb and a receiving room with a few future NFL players.
Take a look how Berry leaves people in the dust with his stutter step more and his crazy fluid change of direction. Berry loos like a great candidate to return punts and kicks too.
LINK
I read some article about freshman who might contribute this year and saw Harlem Berry on the list. That’s an obvious choice, Berry was a top rated running back in his class. But he doesn’t come in with near the hype Fournette did. Fournette came in with a sec ready frame and speed, if not NFL ready. I knew Berry was good, I guess I just figured at 5’10”, 174 pounds, he might have to sit behind Durham and Jackson a year while he develops.
Just to see why Berry is supposedly so good, I pulled up a highlight reel of his and watched it for the first time just now. I linked to it below. Holy crap. Berry is special.
I know, everyone looks good on a highlight reel, even better if they are playing against small schools. Berry is the fastest back in his class, thats an objective measurable. But lots of kids are fast and thats not what stood out to me on his tape. Berry is almost impossible to tackle in the open field. One move he has thats crazy good his stutter step with sudden deceleration and just as sudden acceleration Just as the tackler slows in reaction to the move, Berry accelerates by the tackler in a flash. And it’s not just the stutter step he has, Berry changes direction on a dime. He’s one of those backs that create holes in the line where there are none by juking guys out of their jockstraps.
Durham had a great season last year. Most publications have Durham as the second best rb in the SEC headed into the 2025 season, only Wisner from Texas is ranked higher. Kaleb Jackson is a monster in the weight room, but how that translates to the field is an unknown. It would be great, at a minimum, if he could be a third or fourth and one guy that pushes the pile. Then you have JT Lindsey, a top ten back in the 2025 class, who also has elite speed.
I’m mostly excited about Durham and Berry. Durham looks more physically ready for the SEC than Berry. And Durham also has great speed and change of direction. I didn’t see much playing time for Berry, just based on his size. His tape changed my mind. This could be a really special running back room to go along with a Heisman hopeful qb and a receiving room with a few future NFL players.
Take a look how Berry leaves people in the dust with his stutter step more and his crazy fluid change of direction. Berry loos like a great candidate to return punts and kicks too.
LINK
re: Orgeron fights back against Louisiana Supreme Court ruling that he owes ex-wife $8 million
Posted by paper tiger on 7/11/25 at 6:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Why not?
When he was being a belligerent drunk and she kept the family together and his life from shambles thus allowing his career to continue is a big part of him getting to earning that buyou
The conduct of either spouse has little to do with how they share community property. If the money was earned during the marriage, she gets half. She could have been the drunk and belligerent one, the result would be the same. And I have no knowledge or opinion on what spouse behaved poorly.
I agree with whoever wrote that the odds of getting a 5-2 decision overturned are very slight. I doubt they are presenting any new argument not argued at the hearing.
Adding 20 law firms doesnt bolster the argument.
re: Big John Pearson is tearing up summer ball
Posted by paper tiger on 7/9/25 at 6:56 pm to Jack Crevalle
I think John has a great chance to be the DH or one of the DHs. I can’t figure out if he has a chance to be a position player. One has to think to convince Frey to come back it’s so he can show the pros he has a position to play. That would be first base, I guess, if all our starting outfielders return.
What position does that leave for Pearson? It’s good he is hitting because that might be his best chance to start, as DH. There will be a lot of competition for DH too.
Pearson looks like one of thise guys on your softball team who is kind of fat, drinks beer in the dugout, and hits homeruns on every at bat. Lol
What position does that leave for Pearson? It’s good he is hitting because that might be his best chance to start, as DH. There will be a lot of competition for DH too.
Pearson looks like one of thise guys on your softball team who is kind of fat, drinks beer in the dugout, and hits homeruns on every at bat. Lol
re: Any comments from coastal fans about the ejections?
Posted by paper tiger on 6/29/25 at 8:21 am to CDawson
quote:
You’re missing the point that caused the ejection.
When the ump gives a warning hs is supposed to tell the HC why. When Schnall asked, twice,, why the warning was issued, the ump refused to tell him and instead escalated the situation by telling him get in the dugout.
I think the ejection was too quick, but Schnall 100% knew what the warning was for arguing balls and strikes. Did you not see the part where Schnall went started hollering at the ump it was not one call you missed, but three?
Schnall escalated the incident as well when he did that. Schnall knew from the moment he left the dugout what the warning was for, his statement that he heard some “vague” warning was pure BS. But even if it was true that he did not know what the warning was about when he first approached the ump, he knew what it was before he aggressively approached the ump and hollered that it was three missed calls.
re: Any comments from coastal fans about the ejections?
Posted by paper tiger on 6/25/25 at 6:48 pm to Rohan Gravy
The consensus opinions I have read from most people not associated with LSU are generally these:
1) The coach way over reacted and should have known better.
2) While the ump acted within the rules, he tossed the coach too fast in that spot in the World Series and should made a more emphatic warning that expulsion was imminent.
3) I have heard very few say it impacted the game that much. Most everyone thought LSU was the better team.
I agree pretty much with all three. I particularly did not care for the ejection is 1) I was worried it would motivate the Coastal players and 2) It would become an excuse for losing. 3) I was shocked when it happened, it seemed too quick to me in real time.
As it turned out, while Coastal did use it as an excuse, very few people bought the excuse. There will be no asterisk or footnote on this win in years to come, just another year to put on the intimidator. There has been a lot of debate on if the toss was too quick, but very little debate as to if the best team won.
1) The coach way over reacted and should have known better.
2) While the ump acted within the rules, he tossed the coach too fast in that spot in the World Series and should made a more emphatic warning that expulsion was imminent.
3) I have heard very few say it impacted the game that much. Most everyone thought LSU was the better team.
I agree pretty much with all three. I particularly did not care for the ejection is 1) I was worried it would motivate the Coastal players and 2) It would become an excuse for losing. 3) I was shocked when it happened, it seemed too quick to me in real time.
As it turned out, while Coastal did use it as an excuse, very few people bought the excuse. There will be no asterisk or footnote on this win in years to come, just another year to put on the intimidator. There has been a lot of debate on if the toss was too quick, but very little debate as to if the best team won.
re: Scheduling Clemson for the first game: good move or not
Posted by paper tiger on 6/25/25 at 2:46 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
n this era, the playoff era, it is, without question, a terrible beyond words move. Zero upside. Should have been cancelled as soon as they moved beyond a 4 team playoff
I think with the way the committee penalizes teams for losing tough games and rewards teams for rent-a-wins, we probably lessen our playoff chances scheduling Clemson. Clemson took the same risk, as beating LSU even at Clemson is no given and they have to come here next year. If the goal is to make the playoffs, as it should be, it’s kind of hard to argue scheduling Clemson was a good move. I agree with your rationale there.
But zero upside? There’s a huge upside for LSU if they beat Clemson on the road. It’s the same thing for Texas if they beat Ohio State. The selection committee historically has rewarded teams who win big out of conference games, it’s just that they unfairly punish teams for taking a chance on a big game and losing while rewarding one loss teams who play the likes of Austin Peay.
Scheduling Clemson for the first game: good move or not
Posted by paper tiger on 6/25/25 at 2:28 pm
Pros: Beating Clemson at Clemson would he a big step to getting in the playoffs. It’s one the bigger opening games in recent college football history, the entire country will be tuned in, its great for LSU’s brand. A win at Clemson would create huge momentum, just as the win at Texas in 2019 was one of several signature wins that spurred on their championship season. Big games are more exciting than rent-a-wins. No pollster or media person will accuse LSU of padding their schedule. The game features two legit Heisman hopefuls in Nussmeier and Clubnik and Nuss can get a leg up with a big game. Brian Kelly and Dabo Swinney are two of the most successfully coaches and personalities in college football, adding more intrigue to the game and a chance for Kelly to exorcise his first game demons in a big way. Swinney is a dick, so ruining his season in game one would be cool. Big games are good for recruiting, kids want to be on national tv in big games. And we get Clemson in Tiger Stadium next year for another great opening game in front of a national audience.
Cons: Pretty much the opposite of the above. The selection committee has never fairly rewarded teams with the balls to play big teams, on the road and lose. LSU would probably get more credit for beating a Syracuse in Tiger stadium than for a close loss at Clemson. A loss to Clemson gives LSU little to no margin for error with games at Ole Miss and Alabama coming up and tough home games with A&M and Florida. Two SEC losses might eliminate LSU as a three loss team, whereas with only two losses LSU would probably be a shoe in to the playoffs. Another opening game loss for Kelly would tarnish his image. Klubnik could be the one to get a leg up should he and Nuss be in the Heisman conversation at the end of the year. Swinney is a dick and listening to him do his country bumpkin crowing after the game would be insufferable.
I’m sure there are other pros and cons I missed, and maybe got some wrong that I did.
That said, I think there are enough pros and cons to the point where I can’t predict how the rant will vote. I will say this, if the committee wants college football fans to see more great games like Texas at Ohio State and LSU at Clemson this year, they have to figure out a way where if a team like LSU who loses a close game to Clemson gets less credit than a team like Georgia for beating Marshall, Austin Peay, the Charlotte 49ers and Ga Tech as their out of conference games.
Cons: Pretty much the opposite of the above. The selection committee has never fairly rewarded teams with the balls to play big teams, on the road and lose. LSU would probably get more credit for beating a Syracuse in Tiger stadium than for a close loss at Clemson. A loss to Clemson gives LSU little to no margin for error with games at Ole Miss and Alabama coming up and tough home games with A&M and Florida. Two SEC losses might eliminate LSU as a three loss team, whereas with only two losses LSU would probably be a shoe in to the playoffs. Another opening game loss for Kelly would tarnish his image. Klubnik could be the one to get a leg up should he and Nuss be in the Heisman conversation at the end of the year. Swinney is a dick and listening to him do his country bumpkin crowing after the game would be insufferable.
I’m sure there are other pros and cons I missed, and maybe got some wrong that I did.
That said, I think there are enough pros and cons to the point where I can’t predict how the rant will vote. I will say this, if the committee wants college football fans to see more great games like Texas at Ohio State and LSU at Clemson this year, they have to figure out a way where if a team like LSU who loses a close game to Clemson gets less credit than a team like Georgia for beating Marshall, Austin Peay, the Charlotte 49ers and Ga Tech as their out of conference games.
Braswell and the Mendoza line
Posted by paper tiger on 6/23/25 at 5:26 pm
Most baseball fans know the story of Mario Mendoza, the light hitting shortstop who was a wizard with his glove while playing for the Pittsburgh Pirates. All baseball coaches have some players who do not hit well, but have great fielding prowess. But at some point their batting average gets too low to justify starting them. Mendoza’s batting average hovered around .200 for his MLB career and .200 became the Mendoza line. No matter how good their glove was, one had to hit at least over .200, the Mendoza line, to play.
Braswell, who actually hit okay at the end of last season, for some reason struggled at the plate this year. He ended up hitting .189, just below the Mendoza line, but Johnson stuck with him.
It paid off in the world series where Braswell had some real web gems that saved runs. In the 1-0 game one win over Coastal, a run saved was every bit as valuable as a run made.
It was interesting to see how Braswell remarkably remained popular with many LSU fans who are notoriously hard on players who can’t hit. He hit some hard outs in his last few games, you had to feel for the guy, you knew he so wanted to help his team at the plate. It was a pretty cool moment when he finally got a base hit in the second Coastal game that got him a standing ovation from fans and his team mates.
My favorite defensive play of the World Series was in the ninth inning of game one with the score 1-0 where he snagged a hard hit grounder headed for left field and then making one of the coolest off balance, snap sidearm throws I’ve seen. He not only robbed the guy of a hit, that out helped keep Anderson in the game with his pitch count rising. If I knew how to link to the play, I would, it was smooth as butter. Braswell seems like a well liked, cool dude. His glove played a big part in the World Series, he made a few great throws on tough bunts as well.
Mario Mendoza returned to Mexico in 1983 to play seven more years in the Mexican league batting a respectable .291. Hopefully Braswell will find his bat if he goes on to the minor leagues.
Braswell, who actually hit okay at the end of last season, for some reason struggled at the plate this year. He ended up hitting .189, just below the Mendoza line, but Johnson stuck with him.
It paid off in the world series where Braswell had some real web gems that saved runs. In the 1-0 game one win over Coastal, a run saved was every bit as valuable as a run made.
It was interesting to see how Braswell remarkably remained popular with many LSU fans who are notoriously hard on players who can’t hit. He hit some hard outs in his last few games, you had to feel for the guy, you knew he so wanted to help his team at the plate. It was a pretty cool moment when he finally got a base hit in the second Coastal game that got him a standing ovation from fans and his team mates.
My favorite defensive play of the World Series was in the ninth inning of game one with the score 1-0 where he snagged a hard hit grounder headed for left field and then making one of the coolest off balance, snap sidearm throws I’ve seen. He not only robbed the guy of a hit, that out helped keep Anderson in the game with his pitch count rising. If I knew how to link to the play, I would, it was smooth as butter. Braswell seems like a well liked, cool dude. His glove played a big part in the World Series, he made a few great throws on tough bunts as well.
Mario Mendoza returned to Mexico in 1983 to play seven more years in the Mexican league batting a respectable .291. Hopefully Braswell will find his bat if he goes on to the minor leagues.
re: Official statement of LSU in response to official statement of Coastal Carolina
Posted by paper tiger on 6/23/25 at 10:10 am to OffTheRails
quote:
Lern to spel, OP.
And all CAPS?
Punctuation and paragraphs are helpful. Remedial grammar much?
I promise to work on my grammar if you promise to work on not being such a dick. Deal? :cheers:
Official statement of LSU in response to official statement of Coastal Carolina
Posted by paper tiger on 6/23/25 at 12:23 am
LSU IS AWARE OF THE UNFORTUNATE INCIDENT THAT RESULTED IN THE EJECTION OF COACHES SCHNALL AND SCHMIDT IN GAME 2 OF THE COLLEGE WORLD SERIES. EVEN THOUGH LSU HAD NO ROLE IN THE INCIDENT BETWEEN THE UMPIRES AND COATAL COACHES, LSU RESPECTFULLY DISAGREES WITH THE CLAIM BY THE COASTAL CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION THAT THE EJECTION OF THEIR COACHES HAD ANY IMPACT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE GAME. IF THE CAROLINA COACHES WERE TOO frickING STUPID TO KNOW THAT ARGUING BALLS AND STRIKES AFTER MULTIPLE WARNINGS WOULD GET THEM EJECTED, OVER A MEANINGLESS STRIKE ONE CALL IN THE FIRST INNING NO LESS, HOW WOULD HAVING THESE TWO MORONS IN THE DUGOUT HAVE CHANGED ANYTHING ANYWAY? ITS EQUALLY UNFORTUNATE THAT RATHER THAN ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY AFTER THE GAME FOR HIS ANGER ISSUES THAT GOT HIM EJECTED AND CONGRATULATE LSU AND THEIR PLAYERS FOR THEIR WIN, COACH SCHNALL COMICALLY CLAIMED HE WAS ONLY VAUGLY AWARE HE HAD BEEN WARNED, AND FAILED TO MENTION THAT HE WENT ON TO ARGUE THREE OTHER CALLS AFTER BEING WARNED THREE MORE TIMES. THE STATEMENT BY THE COASTAL ADMINISTRATION WAS NOTABLE FOR TAKING ZERO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR COACHES ROLE IN GETTING TOSSED AND IN ITS FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND CONGRATULATE THE LSU PLAYERS AND COACHES WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CAROLINA COACHES HISTORIC MELTDOWN. LSU DOES WISH TO CONGRATULATE THE COASTAL CAROLINA PLAYERS ON REACHING THE WORLD SERIES FINALS AND FOR PLAYING WITH GREAT SKILL AND HEART IN BOTH GAMES. FINALLY, LSU WOULD LIKE TO CONGRATULATE COACH JAY JOHNSON FOR WINNING WITH CLASS AND DIGNITY, AND FOR KNOWING THE RULES AND FOR NOT GETTING EJECTED OVER THE MANY STRIKE AND BALL CALLS THAT DIDN’T GO HIS WAY. GO TIGERS.
re: Brown could’ve scored
Posted by paper tiger on 6/22/25 at 4:25 pm to DBG
quote:
He wouldn’t have scored
Whether he would have scored or not or whether it was the World Series or a weekend game against Nicholls is not the point. From little league on kids are taught to hustle and run out everything, there is zero reason not to.
Add to that, Brown likes to call himself the fastest guy on the team. Brown was 100% wrong in jogging to start from 1st base. He’s a good kid and a good player. I bet he would be the first to admit he made a lazy and undisciplined play.
I dont even understand the debate. Not giving full effort was bad in any coaches book.
Popular
10












