Started By
Message
locked post

(Poll) Is this comment racist or not.

Posted on 12/29/12 at 5:42 pm
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 5:42 pm
Racist-5
Slightly Bigoted-2
Not racist-2

===================================
This is the first time I have been banned from a place and it is for supposedly being "racist". The comment was in response to the NSA getting the greenlight from congress(still awaiting President Retards signature) to continue warrant-less wire taps.

The comment was this.

"The US would be better off if we would realize that both sides are out to screw us. If we would realize that we don't need to fund wars we can't afford, and cut off shaniqua with her 22 children. Then maybe she will think twice before spreading her leg......"

There was more after this, but the "shaniqua" comment was what they banned me for. They(being Verge.com) said this was a racist comment(even though I am also on record for calling out about every other teet sucker too.) So, are they being way oversensitive about this, or was it really racist? Keeping in mind there is plenty of research to prove what I said. I never said this to be a dick, but it is proven that being born to "shaniqua" means you are 3x more likely to be born into a single parent household and more times then not live off welfare. My entire point was to disincentivize the welfare system. But clearly that makes me racist. Or so I am told.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 9:34 pm
Posted by RunLindsayRun
LaGrange | Athens
Member since Sep 2012
2781 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 5:48 pm to
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26184 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 5:53 pm to
The Jefferson signal has been lit, watch out RLR
Posted by Lord of the Board
Member since Nov 2012
2045 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

The Jefferson signal has been lit
I always imagined it looked a little something like this LINK
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70459 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:18 pm to
Racist.
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Racist.


Well, at least I can get one legit answer.
Posted by stateline
Member since Sep 2012
175 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:26 pm to
Slightly Bigotted....fricktards that throw around 'racist' don't know what the word actually means
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Slightly Bigotted....fricktards that throw around 'racist' don't know what the word actually means


That's kind of the way I thought. I mean I might could have understood a PM or something, but a banning?
Posted by Lord of the Board
Member since Nov 2012
2045 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:34 pm to
I would say it definitely has a racist undertone to it. Obviously you picked the name to represent a black woman and people might take offense to that due to the 22 children comment going along with it. Not worth a banning at all, maybe a warning at most. Just my .02
Posted by adawgj
Brunswick
Member since Oct 2012
1749 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:50 pm to
Yeah, its racist, but You spoke truth and thats all that matters to anyone above a liberal.
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

I would say it definitely has a racist undertone to it. Obviously you picked the name to represent a black woman and people might take offense to that due to the 22 children comment going along with it. Not worth a banning at all, maybe a warning at most. Just my .02


You're probably right, but it's not like I said something without a factual basis. It would be one thing If I said something about chicken and dubs. But other than exaggerating the amount of children, there is plenty of research to back up my claim.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51185 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 6:57 pm to
You could have worded it differently, but I am in total agreement. As it stands, it is ban worthy.

Georgia is a tough place to be, if one is white.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 6:59 pm
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

You could have worded it differently

You are most definitely correct there. And I probably should have.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70459 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 7:03 pm to
You didn't pick the name Tammy or Katrina, or Norma Jean, to represent the Appalachian poor white people that collect welfare, and teach their kids to NOT read so they get child disability as well.

You chose a black name. You did it on purpose. After you clicked Enter, you licked your lips and wrung your hands, just waiting to see what they were going to do about it. They banned you. You expected it. Now here you are looking for validation.

You are an amateur.
Posted by Chef Leppard
Member since Sep 2011
11739 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

The Jefferson signal has been lit


The funny thing about that.

Ive actually chuckled at a few of Jeffys threads :cringe:, but the guy will make a quantum leap as a poster when he figures out this is a message board

Fake indignation towards ppl that use short quips and humorous pics while you spend two hours on a single post with elaborate visuals and anti-snarky snark is just..idk

Its like going to an Apple convention wearing a commodore 64 t-shirt and trying to get the phone number of the whore by the door texting on her busted blackberry

But all in all, I like Jeffy. I really do
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

You didn't pick the name Tammy or Katrina, or Norma Jean, to represent the Appalachian poor white people that collect welfare, and teach their kids to NOT read so they get child disability as well.


You're comparing the minority of one subset to the majority of another. The only other subset of people that I could have used there are Latinos or american Indians. Which would have still drawn the racist comment. And no, I actually didn't expect anyone to come back with a racist comment. That was just the first set of people I think of when it comes to welfare. The second being Latinos. By stating the truth that doesn't make one a racist. My comment may have had a "racist" undertone because of exaggerating the number of children, but other than that, it's not like I said anything that wasn't true. Should I have added "Norma Jean" and "Isabella", but I didn't. For that, and only that, am I sorry.

LINK

In addition to this^ there is also this
quote:

Poverty: Two fifths of single mother families are poor, triple the poverty rate for the rest of the population. Single-mother families are nearly five times as likely to be poor than married-couple families. The poverty rate for single-mother families is 40.7% compared to 8.8% for married-couple families.4 The majority of poor children are in single mother families with 24% of children now living in such households.5 Hardship: Two fifths of single mother families are “food insecure,” one seventh use food pantries, one fifth have no health insurance, one third spend more than half their income on housing. Three quarters of homeless families are single mother families. Welfare & Food Stamp Receipt: Two thirds of all single mothers receive Food Stamps6. Among children with single mothers, 41% get food stamps and 59% don’t. Although two fifths of all single mothers are poor, only one tenth of all single mothers receive TANF. Though a small percentage, they represent more than 90% of all TANF families. For those who do receive assistance, the amount was far less than the minimum they’d need to to stave off hardship. In 2010, TANF benefit levels for a family of three were less than half of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) in all states.


LINK /

It's not hard to see a correlation here. You are 2-3x as likely to be born to a single parent house in a black community. And 2/3's of single parents are on welfare. Those are straight out of the research. Nothing "racist" about it.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 7:43 pm
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Yeah, its racist, but You spoke truth and thats all that matters to anyone above a liberal.


This
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70459 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 8:03 pm to
So your original point was that poor unskilled unemployed single mothers with many children should have their government paychecks cut off.
Posted by 1454
He77
Member since Sep 2012
325 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

So your original point was that poor unskilled unemployed single mothers with many children should have their government paychecks cut off.


Yes. That and able bodied old people. It's time to start phasing these items out. That was my point. Which would have been known to anyone that actually read the entire post.(the original one, not the repost above.) In fact, I was asked to clarify by one poster prior to the ban. In which I replied that starvation is a great motivator. And we needed to disincentivize popping out multiple children with no way to pay for them.
Posted by Batdawg
Member since Dec 2012
360 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 8:41 pm to
Are their black women named shaniqua?

Yes

Do alot of black women spread their legs for any man?

Yes

Do most black women have multiple children?

Yes


Facts are facts. It's not racist. If they don't want that stereotype then they should stop friggin doing it to themselves.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter