Started By
Message

re: New evidence that Grantham's D was too complicated?

Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:45 pm to
Posted by Dawgs9
Where ever I am
Member since Sep 2012
1958 posts
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

That could mean a number of things. He could have simplified the scheme for those players




Or those players are smarter than the ones at UGA
Posted by Cobb Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
9804 posts
Posted on 3/12/14 at 7:37 am to
For the sake of argument what will everybody say if Coach Grantham has tremendous success up at Louisville right out of the gate. Some of you will be eating a lot of crow pie.....

I'll eat the crow if he has better players on D at Louisville than he had in '12 and has tremendous success with them. But also keep in mind that he's playing against ACC teams.
Posted by Huntnzkennel
south ga
Member since Jan 2014
3 posts
Posted on 3/12/14 at 10:05 pm to
I wish todd grantham all the luck and hope he is successful at Louisville but I'm glad we went another direction. defense was a problem: hopefully its fixed. special teams was a problem: hopefully its fixed. S&C has been a problem: hopefully were making strides here also. 6 months from now we'll all know more but for now we can all just speculate
Posted by Chef Leppard
Member since Sep 2011
11739 posts
Posted on 3/12/14 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Or those players are smarter than the ones at UGA


Just think how nasty the defense at Harvard would be if they threw some money at CTG
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter