Started By
Message
re: AM video - Reviewing the SECCG Finish "A game that haunts me every night"
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:09 am to Lord of the Board
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:09 am to Lord of the Board
Once again, watch the freakin REPLAY...there was NOWHERE to put the ball...did you listen to CMR's presser? There are 2 options on the play, the fade and over the shoulder...the Bama defender bit on neither
1
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:25 am to RD Dawg
Even if Murray can't get it to him, it's an incomplete pass and we can still run another play or 2
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:04 am to Lord of the Board
Understand, but the whole point of spiking vs non spiking was that Bama was on their heels and perhaps not prepared on the play and clearly the were. Now, if we had attempted something in the middle of the field (wide open)
I wouldn't have had a problem with the non-spike decision...even with the same results
I wouldn't have had a problem with the non-spike decision...even with the same results
Posted on 12/13/12 at 9:20 am to JimDawginTexas
quote:
The call was a low probability call. Evidenced by the fact it did not work
I don't think logic is your strong suit. Just because the play didn't work (and it didn't work because it was tipped by a DL btw, not because of the playcall itself) doesn't mean it was a low probability call.
Using your logic, ANY pass at all is low probability evidenced by the fact the ball was tipped. I guess the only thing we should've done was run it eh?
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:09 pm to RD Dawg
The point of calling the play instead of spiking it is to catch the defense winded and off guard. Whether Alabama was actually off guard is a different matter. The play call was good even if it didn't work as intended. To say otherwise is to deny the strategy while focusing only on the outcome.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 12:10 pm
Page 2 of 2
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News