Started By
Message
re: Lets Talk Politics
Posted on 8/7/15 at 7:55 am to AgBQ00
Posted on 8/7/15 at 7:55 am to AgBQ00
Well Clinton served two terms because he was more like us than them.
But if we don't focus on who is "electable" it won't matter one bit.
Right now I don't know who is actually electable other than bobby J or trump and trump will never sniff the ticket and if he stays in the game much longer will divide the ticket.
And that is a huge problem because then liberals are gonna curb stomp anyone else unless another electable personality steps up. If you don't think they can fire up their hate machine rhetoric and through a personable character out there to run away with this thing then you learned nothing from the last 2 elections.
But if we don't focus on who is "electable" it won't matter one bit.
Right now I don't know who is actually electable other than bobby J or trump and trump will never sniff the ticket and if he stays in the game much longer will divide the ticket.
And that is a huge problem because then liberals are gonna curb stomp anyone else unless another electable personality steps up. If you don't think they can fire up their hate machine rhetoric and through a personable character out there to run away with this thing then you learned nothing from the last 2 elections.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:05 am to Old Sarge
quote:
electable
quote:
trump
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:07 am to Old Sarge
What I learned the last two election is milquetoast "centrists" who pander get run over.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:10 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
You seem to struggle with that word.
If the party put their full weight behind him, he would win. But it's not going to happen.
I'm not saying I support him, read my post again. Electable and who we would prefer are two different things.
If the party put their full weight behind him, he would win. But it's not going to happen.
I'm not saying I support him, read my post again. Electable and who we would prefer are two different things.
This post was edited on 8/7/15 at 8:15 am
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:14 am to AgBQ00
The only way we'll ever win a presidential election with a hard liner is if the live throw out the most uninspiring loser imaginable, and they are too smart for that
Twitter, Facebook, other social media, and a younger generation demand a popularity contest.
Twitter, Facebook, other social media, and a younger generation demand a popularity contest.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:15 am to Old Sarge
quote:
full weight behind him, he would win. But it's not going to happen.
I'm not struggling with the term at all, I just disagree with your statement above strongly. He's a clown and will continue to be exposed as such. He would never win a general election under the scrutiny that would come with it, he would raked over the coals
This post was edited on 8/7/15 at 8:16 am
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:18 am to AgBQ00
The party still has an image problem.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:21 am to Old Sarge
We have got to get out of the left's trap of pandering to groups. Balkanization is their game. We truly need someone who will not approach the election as making promises to groups to get elected. We need someone who can clearly state the case that shrinking the government and allowing the people to work in and enjoy their liberty is the only way we survive going forward.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:22 am to AgBQ00
Couldn't catch it last night....but I stand with Rand 
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:26 am to Old Sarge
It has the image problem it has because it has gotten away from its foundation. It has always been the party of personal freedom and less government intrusion into the individual's life. They need to get back to demonstrating out the democrat policies have always and will always enslave people (both literally and metaphorically)
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:28 am to SpartyGator
quote:
I stand with Rand
If you take Saint Ron and boil off everything about him that makes him great - his intelligence, his fortitude, his sincerity, his true belief in his ideals... you'd be left with Rand - a sniveling little weasel who used his father's name to be a politician.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:29 am to AgBQ00
quote:
We have got to get out of the left's trap of pandering to groups.
California and Florida are lost to the dems forever if we do this. Better to get someone elected than no one elected
Posted on 8/7/15 at 8:36 am to Old Sarge
I think you would be surprised. We have been playing at being dem-lite for so long the party is truly scared that to actually take a stand would mean disaster. It does us no good to be almost like them. We either need to be them or not be them. But the country desperately needs to get away from the current one party system. There is currently no difference between the two parties.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 9:26 am to Old Sarge
quote:
My Hemi > your tundra
My Chevy > your Hemi > any Tundra
If I could vote it'd be for Rubio
This post was edited on 8/7/15 at 9:39 am
Posted on 8/7/15 at 9:30 am to Farmer1906
quote:
I'm all in on Cruz and Paul.
Ted Cruz is a sleeze ball dude.
Posted on 8/7/15 at 9:35 am to cas4t
He's basically a televangelist at this point. He's getting tiresome and Roger was 100% correct when he said he's the MSNBC caricature of a Republican
Posted on 8/7/15 at 9:39 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
he's the MSNBC caricature of a Republican
this is frighteningly accurate
Posted on 8/7/15 at 9:45 am to Farmer1906
Rand Paul was pretty much the only major-party candidate I would've voted for and


Posted on 8/7/15 at 10:34 am to Farmer1906
quote:
Who do yall want to get the nomination?
+
I'm fully aware that neither will be on the eventual ticket.
But that's my dream team.
I'm pretty lukewarm on the others.
Trump? The whole thing puzzles me.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top



4






