Started By
Message
Stanford leading rusher Nathaniel Peat to Mizzou
Posted on 1/16/22 at 9:40 am
Posted on 1/16/22 at 9:40 am
Gives us a nice option for a 3 man rotation in the backfield. He’s originally from COMO and was the state 100M champion his SR year.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 10:23 am to JesusQuintana
Did he graduate?
He averaged 6 carries and a little over 30 yards a game last year....hopefully he at least got a degree from Stanford.
He averaged 6 carries and a little over 30 yards a game last year....hopefully he at least got a degree from Stanford.
This post was edited on 1/16/22 at 10:24 am
Posted on 1/16/22 at 10:28 am to JesusQuintana
Maybe he could have helped you beat Army.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 10:55 am to theenemy
Splitting time obviously. All conference kick returner as well. He’ll help us there and be in the rotation in the backfield with Elijah Young (Gatorade player of the year in TN) and 4* incoming freshman Tavorus Jones.
Good pickup that fills a need.
Good pickup that fills a need.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:08 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
Good pickup that fills a need.
Maybe so.
But my point was....playing at Stanford didn't work out great....hopefully he still got a degree from there.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:11 am to theenemy
Part of the reason he's transferring to Mizzou is for better academics. He will get his degree from Mizzou and be set for life
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:23 am to theenemy
It’s pretty wild how far Stanford has fallen in the last 3 years. I wonder how much good will David Shaw has stored up from the good years because he probably would already be fired at any SEC school.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:03 pm to JesusQuintana
He’s mainly a get for KR with a little 3rd/4th string RB action.
Led the pac in return yards at 26 per
RBs prob look like:
1 Young
2 cox
3 Jones
4 peat
Led the pac in return yards at 26 per
RBs prob look like:
1 Young
2 cox
3 Jones
4 peat
This post was edited on 1/16/22 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:23 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Led the pac in return yards at 26 per
I hate to break it to you but the PAC 12 isn't the SEC.
Good luck with a PAC 12 reject.

Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:34 pm to ArHog
That’s fantastic my guy, and if this “project” fails I guess we can just use Burden who would likely be the best in the country at returning. Point of not issuing him all the time is for injury. Not worried, we’re in a pretty neat spot on that.
Also I get sec vs pac argument for most, but KR is pretty stupid one to take on.
Also I get sec vs pac argument for most, but KR is pretty stupid one to take on.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 1:15 pm to JesusQuintana
Maybe this will happen and maybe it won't but,
this is in no way remotely official at this time.
JQ has no source, just a random twitter acccount.
this is in no way remotely official at this time.
JQ has no source, just a random twitter acccount.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 1:56 pm to JesusQuintana
We have more pressing needs. I thought our rb's looked fine.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 2:06 pm to mizslu314
quote:
1 Young 2 cox 3 Jones 4 peat
Cox won’t be number 2
Him or Harris for #4.
Peat will get carries. The battle for #1 back is wide open and will be between Young, Jones and Peat. You’ll likely see more of a committee approach this year with Badie gone.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 2:06 pm to Miznoz
quote:
just a random twitter acccount.
LOL…hardly.
It’s done and will be announced soon
Posted on 1/16/22 at 2:35 pm to JesusQuintana
Totally forgot about BJ
Posted on 1/16/22 at 2:50 pm to JesusQuintana
If it was done it would be announced officially, not on some fly by night account.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 3:26 pm to Miznoz
Ha, ok bud.
Go ahead and show me where this account has ever been wrong or when it wasn’t the first to report the news.
They very obviously have a source close to the program. He never misses. Hasn’t happened once and he’s broken multiple pieces of recruiting and staff news.
Go ahead and show me where this account has ever been wrong or when it wasn’t the first to report the news.
They very obviously have a source close to the program. He never misses. Hasn’t happened once and he’s broken multiple pieces of recruiting and staff news.
Posted on 1/16/22 at 3:48 pm to Miznoz
A few ppl have sorta leaked this, and him to mizzou was really always a thing
Posted on 1/16/22 at 5:00 pm to Miznoz
Why would someone lie about this? It's not like he's the top transfer in the country or something
Posted on 1/17/22 at 8:15 am to mouse_cop
quote:
Part of the reason he's transferring to Mizzou is for better academics.
quote:
Stanford
quote:
better academics

Popular
Back to top
