Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:25 pm to REBEL5 AC
quote:
I don't think he's overrated. I just think he is in a tough backfield. We have a lot of RB's of equal skill. The thing about Kailo is his weaknesses can be improved through coaching. He has the speed, shiftiness, and quick feet.
This is the correct answer frustrated Miss St fans
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:31 pm to engie
quote:
If only we had the RB depth of OM and a QB that could run it like Brunetti, maybe we wouldn't have had to run our defensive tackles at the position...
You can't be serious
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:48 pm to engie
Yards per game is literally the dumbest way to tell which unit is better.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:26 pm to adammwilson
quote:
Yards per game is literally the dumbest way to tell which unit is better.
How is better?
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:26 pm to adammwilson
quote:
You can't be serious
You obviously don't have a clue what I'm referring to.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:30 pm to engie
Yeah I do and it's dumb
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:32 pm to engie
Touchdowns given up and yards per attempt average yards per game is ok too
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:33 pm to adammwilson
How?
It's pretty ridiculous to claim you've got a badass stable of RBs that's better across the board than MSU's(yes they claim this). Thus forcing a "badass" to move to corner -- when, with the marbles on the table, you gave the ball to a DT.
Easy to understand -- unless you are an idiot.
It's pretty ridiculous to claim you've got a badass stable of RBs that's better across the board than MSU's(yes they claim this). Thus forcing a "badass" to move to corner -- when, with the marbles on the table, you gave the ball to a DT.
Easy to understand -- unless you are an idiot.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:35 pm to adammwilson
Nice run-on sentence.
If "yards per game" is ok -- what are you bitching about?
If "yards per game" is ok -- what are you bitching about?
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:36 pm to engie
You don't seem to understand the difference between RBs that are speed backs and power backs. They have a lot of quality speed backs but no power backs. Either way who cares? Still a quality rotation.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:37 pm to engie
Thanks grammar nazi. I'm on my IPhone and thought it did the punctuation for you. I'm bitching because trying to make your point and only using one criteria is dumb.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 10:00 pm to adammwilson
Can't even operate an iPhone? You are certainly a UGA grad**
I don't even remember what this "criteria" was about -- since that argument was literally weeks ago. If you'll remind me, I'll be happy to break it down further for you.
Why are you in here arguing in a recruiting thread about a player that's going to State and has no interest in UGA?
I don't even remember what this "criteria" was about -- since that argument was literally weeks ago. If you'll remind me, I'll be happy to break it down further for you.
Why are you in here arguing in a recruiting thread about a player that's going to State and has no interest in UGA?
Posted on 7/17/14 at 10:03 pm to adammwilson
quote:
They have a lot of quality speed backs but no power backs. Either way who cares? Still a quality rotation.
If the entire RB corps in one dimensional -- it's not "quality" now is it?
And yes, I know the difference. How does that change the fact that this mid 4* badass that I called a likely bust from day 1 has already been lost in the shuffle -- and sent to defense(where he's 3rd string -- at best)?
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:05 pm to engie
quote:
If you'll remind me, I'll be happy to break it down further for you.
Jesus Christ here come the pie charts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:36 pm to reggierayreb
engie pls
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:07 am to engie
This is my first time on td with it. Let's not act like Miss St is the finest of schools.
Because I hate fans talking shite for no reason that are full of it. I also came because I am an LSU fan and I know they are in the distant hunt.
Because I hate fans talking shite for no reason that are full of it. I also came because I am an LSU fan and I know they are in the distant hunt.
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:08 am to engie
There can be quality even if it is 1 dimensional. That doesn't change the quality.
He didn't offer anything the other RBs didn't. Regardless it's absolutely dumb to give up on a player after a year. He could always move back to RB once some players leave.
He didn't offer anything the other RBs didn't. Regardless it's absolutely dumb to give up on a player after a year. He could always move back to RB once some players leave.
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 12:10 am
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:21 am to adammwilson
damn engie mad and dumb.
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:24 am to engie
quote:
Why are you in here arguing in a recruiting thread about a player that's going to State and has no interest in UGA?
When Peters doesn't sign with MSU next Spring, you will completely deny ever claiming he was going to state. You do that with every recruit that ends up going somewhere else...
Page 25 of 40
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News