Started By
Message
re: Georgia about to lose their best recruiter
Posted on 12/30/17 at 8:21 pm to jangalang
Posted on 12/30/17 at 8:21 pm to jangalang
Big difference between the amount of fortune au needed to beat uga and the other games.
Anyways. 2013 East had 2 top 5 teams, a ranked Vandy, and a 4th place uga who beat LSU and lost via miracle vs AU. Amount of rushing yards in the seccg doesn't trump that or change any of that. That point was weak from the start.
Anyways. 2013 East had 2 top 5 teams, a ranked Vandy, and a 4th place uga who beat LSU and lost via miracle vs AU. Amount of rushing yards in the seccg doesn't trump that or change any of that. That point was weak from the start.
1
Posted on 12/30/17 at 8:31 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Big difference between the amount of fortune au needed to beat uga and the other games.
Lol no
Against Moo State- One of Prescott's WRs dropped a GW TD pass in the EZ.
Against TAM- A critical horsecollar penalty was not called which allowed Auburn to lasso and beat a strong Manziel led squad in the end.
Against Bama: kick fricking six
Are you stupid?
quote:
Anyways. 2013 East had 2 top 5 teams,
Auburn and Bama were top 3 until the Iron Bowl. LSU, Moo State and TAM were pretty strong as well.
tSECw was much stronger and it wasn’t even close. There were only two SECe teams with less than 5 losses while there were 4 in the west as a matter of fact. shite like that cannot be denied.
This post was edited on 12/30/17 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:06 pm to jangalang
quote:
There were only two SECe teams with less than 5 losses while there were 4 in the west as a matter of fact. shite like that cannot be denied.
Wrong,Vandy went 9-4 and finished in the top 25 and if not for our starting RB's and WR's being lost pretty much for the season and the fluke at AU we easily win 10 games and finish with 10 victories and end up with 3 victories over top 12 teams.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:20 pm to jangalang
quote:
Against Moo State- One of Prescott's WRs dropped a GW TD pass in the EZ. Against TAM- A critical horsecollar penalty was not called which allowed Auburn to lasso and beat a strong Manziel led squad in the end. Against Bama: kick fricking six
All of that was fortunate, but None of that compares to what was needed for au to beat uga. Big diff between fortune and extreme fortune.
quote:
Auburn and Bama were top 3 until the Iron Bowl. LSU, Moo State and TAM were pretty strong as well. tSECw was much stronger and it wasn’t even close. There were only two SECe teams with less than 5 losses while there were 4 in the west as a matter of fact. shite like that cannot be denied.
Uh, no one was comparing said the east was stronger than the west. The west being stronger doesn't mean the east can't also be strong.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:48 pm to djsdawg
quote:. They were all game changing plays. Any other distinctions that exist inside your pea brain aren’t relevant nor insightful.
All of that was fortunate, but None of that compares to what was needed for au to beat uga. Big diff between fortune and extreme fortune.
quote:
The west being stronger doesn't mean the east can't also be strong.
It’s all relative. The west was stronger, the east was just no where near as strong. Don’t get butthurt over that fact.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:53 pm to Razor Dawg
quote:
Wrong,Vandy went 9-4 and finished in the top 25 and if not for our starting RB's and WR's being lost pretty much for the season and the fluke at AU we easily win 10 games and finish with 10 victories and end up with 3 victories over top 12 teams.
You can “what if” things all night, it still won’t change the fact that your team had 5 losses and didn’t help the image of the east at all.
Auburn’s 74 rushes, 545 rushing yards, and 7 rushing TDs against the SEC east champions didn’t help either, so...
This post was edited on 12/30/17 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 12/30/17 at 10:43 pm to jangalang
quote:
Auburn’s 74 rushes, 545 rushing yards, and 7 rushing TDs against the SEC east champions didn’t help either, so...
And Auburn's defense gave up 530 total yards to Missouri.Not like the game was some type of blowout.
We beat LSU and if not for a complete fluke we beat AU.
To sit here and think that the west was somehow heads and shoulders above the SECe is absurd. SC also beat
it's 2 Webster opponents and 6th ranked Clemson and finished 5th in the final AP poll.
Posted on 12/31/17 at 12:52 am to jangalang
quote:
They were all game changing plays. Any other distinctions that exist inside your pea brain aren’t relevant nor insightful.
Not all game changing plays are equal. Plenty of relevant distinctions to make between them. Ignorant to declare otherwise.
Some involve luck, some dont.
Some involve a bad ref, some dont.
Some happen early, some happen late.
quote:
It’s all relative. The west was stronger, the east was just no where near as strong.
Ok. Again, you are off topic. How strong the west was is totally irrelevant to the topic, which is about the east and only the east. If you want to stay on topic, you need to prove the east was crap in 2013. Are you up to the task, or are you gonna do more mouth breathing.....?
quote:
Don’t get butthurt over that fact.
To accuse me of being butthurt despite no indications of such a feeling makes you look out of touch with reality.
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 12:58 am
Posted on 12/31/17 at 4:49 am to djsdawg
quote:
Not all game changing plays are equal.
They were all gamechangjng. Whether you want to call them fortunate, moderately fortunate, or extremely fortunate, I don’t give a flying frick. Again irrelevance.
quote:
Some involve luck, some dont. Some involve a bad ref, some dont. Some happen early, some happen late.
In Auburn’s case they all happened within the last minute of the game I believe. But now that you mention it, I will add that a “bad ref” did generously give Georgia a TD and other favorable calls, so there shouldn’t have been an opportunity for “extreme fortune.”
quote:
If you want to stay on topic, you need to prove the east was crap in 2013.
The topic was actually proving the SECe wasnt very strong, dumbass. Believe it or not, there is a middle ground. Missouri gave up 59 points on 74 rushes for 545 yards and 7 rushing TDs in the SECCG and they did as the best available out of the SEC East. No division can make a claim of strength after losing the SECC to a 2 loss western division team like that.
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 5:01 am
Posted on 12/31/17 at 4:59 am to Razor Dawg
quote:
And Auburn's defense gave up 530 total yards to Missouri.Not like the game was some type of blowout.
For one, Auburn won by 17 and never had to break a sweat on offense. Two, you’re talking to a guy that has accepted that Auburn was a two loss team that was not strong enough against FSU. It’s all relative like I said. Strong, stronger, strongest. Nice try.
quote:
To sit here and think that the west was somehow heads and shoulders above the SECe is absurd.
Had been that way for years, if not decades...Also, don’t kid yourself if you think we couldn’t have beaten USCe. Would’ve ended up just like 2010.
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 5:05 am
Posted on 12/31/17 at 8:55 am to jangalang
quote:
Had been that way for years, if not decades
No it wasn’t. It has only been stronger for about the last ten years. The East was better for a very long time prior to that. The West isn’t that good now. Stop brown-nosing Auburn idiots.
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 9:06 am
Posted on 12/31/17 at 10:12 am to jangalang
quote:
were all gamechangjng. Whether you want to call them fortunate, moderately fortunate, or extremely fortunate, I don’t give a flying frick. A
You seem to care a lot about it. Not all game changing plays require luck, much less extreme luck.
Big difference between making a purposeful game changing play and lucking into a fluke off a bad pass with a weird bounce to a wr and it only standing because a ref let your LT choke hold a pass rusher in plain view who beat him off the snap.
I don't see why this bothers you so much. Maybe because you feel it diminishes the accomplishment, which is does in a way.
Posted on 12/31/17 at 10:25 am to jangalang
quote:
topic was actually proving the SECe wasnt very strong, dumbass. Believe it or not, there is a middle ground. Missouri gave up 59 points on 74 rushes for 545 yards and 7 rushing TDs in the SECCG and they did as the best available out of the SEC East. No division can make a claim of strength after losing the SECC to a 2 loss western division team like that.
The discussion started when your boy fan said the east was crap starting in a specific time period. I think he tried to claim 2001 was when the east went to crap. That was never proven. The east being crap in 2013 also wasn't proven.
The argument for it being strong is much stronger than the one for it being crap.
Being strong is supported by the rankings of 3 teams and the 4th place teams performance vs 2 top west teams. Cherry picking a specific stat in one game doesn't come close to trumping all of that.
quote:
No division can make a claim of strength after losing the SECC to a 2 loss western division team like that.
So you are saying the west was not strong in 2017 because uga beat auburn worse than auburn beat mizzou in 2013. Interesting
Posted on 12/31/17 at 10:59 am to jangalang
quote:
Nice try
What?This was in regards about the SECe being
shite in '13 compared to the SECw.
quote:
Had been that way for years, if not decades
ETC are you talking about?SECw was 6-11 from '92 to '08
Decades??
quote:
you think we couldn’t have beaten USCe. Would’ve ended up just like 2010.
Not close to being the same team...beyond idiotic to think the outcome would be the same 3 years later.
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 12/31/17 at 11:09 am to Razor Dawg
quote:
What?The topic was started about the SECe being shite in '13 compared to the SECw.
No it wasn't. The topic has and had nothing to do with the west at all.
Posted on 12/31/17 at 11:14 am to djsdawg
quote:
No it wasn't
Got sidetracked from OP...should have said sub topic.
Posted on 12/31/17 at 3:13 pm to djsdawg
quote:
You and phan sure are reaching for some super Arbitrary comparisons. It's beyond pathetic to attempt to try to separate the Hershel and bo years, but that's what auburn has been reduced to.
Ok, start in 1986 (after Bo). No UGA fan would trade those 30 years for AU's last 30 years.
6 SEC Championships to 3
1 NC to 0
3 perfect seasons to 0
2 title game appearances to 0
1 Heisman to 0
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 12/31/17 at 3:21 pm to RandySavage
Anything but including the Herschel years, right? It's just such a pathetic and obvious attempt to make your own school appear better than a hated rival. Anyways, Since 86, uga is 10th and au is 13th in overall winning.
Posted on 12/31/17 at 3:22 pm to djsdawg
Since 1992:
Uga 7th
Au 18th
Dayum
Uga 7th
Au 18th
Dayum
Posted on 12/31/17 at 3:31 pm to djsdawg
It's convenient for me because I was born in 1982.
I know it's been a long, long, long 37 years. Fret not though things appear they will start getting better soon. May only be 8 days away...
I know it's been a long, long, long 37 years. Fret not though things appear they will start getting better soon. May only be 8 days away...
Page 8 of 11
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News