Started By
Message

re: Would the SEC consider targeting Cincinnatti?

Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:47 am to
Posted by cajunjj
Madison, AL
Member since May 2008
7427 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:47 am to
Ban!
Posted by WeBleedCrimson
Member since Mar 2008
21955 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:48 am to


wow Oregon is mad
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22045 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:52 am to
quote:

A team from Ohio in the southeastern conference? That makes sense.


Cincinnatti is on the border with Kentucky. And it's closer to another member school than either aTm or Mizzou was/is.

I threw it out there knowing it's unlikely but challenging people to compare it to other recent moves. Mainly Rutgers to B1G
This post was edited on 12/14/12 at 9:53 am
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29307 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 10:21 am to
I would rather take Virginia Commonwealth, and VCU doesn't have a football team.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 10:32 am to
quote:

VT and NC State should be the next 2 schools added.. Then move Mizzou to the West like they should be.


^this
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
9080 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 3:25 pm to
Maybe with a drone strike.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter