Started By
Message

re: Would Bama have beaten LSU's non-Bama opponents?

Posted on 12/24/11 at 2:34 am to
Posted by Analyze That
ThereAndBackAgain
Member since Nov 2009
19867 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 2:34 am to
Bama wouldn't have beat Oregon at the beginning of the season with the Oline and QB rotations/problems
Posted by SouGent
Sherman, TX
Member since Jul 2007
1975 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 3:58 am to
quote:

LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten


Just another dumbass Gump who is too stupid to understand that coulda/shoulda/woulda beaten is NOT the same as HAS BEATEN!!

Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10452 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:46 am to
5 turnovers vs mighty Kent.
Posted by Lafayetiger
Houston
Member since Dec 2003
71 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 8:36 am to
Yes the Gumps would have beaten LSU's opponents, just as LSU would have run thru Bama's.

But that doesn't matter.

At the end of the season did Bama beat LSU?
Bama couldn't even beat its own scheduled opponents.
So the point is moot.
Posted by alatxtgr
The Nation of Texas
Member since Sep 2006
2382 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 8:48 am to
Conjecture pure conjecture, or you might say Would LSU have beaten ULM when BAMA didn't???
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 8:58 am to
I think Alabama would have beaten each of the LSU opponents by double digits just as LSU did. Perhaps Oregon's speed might have created some issues, but I think Alabama would have worn them down and won by double digits
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
82918 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 9:16 am to
And I bet okie St goes 11-1 against bama's schedule too.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
82918 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 9:21 am to
Well the bcs this year has allowed Bama to just claim it would have gone undefeated against any schedule (except the schedule Bama actualy played) without having to actually do it. That's the beauty of the eyeball test.
Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7700 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 9:44 am to
The only team on that schedule which Bama may not have been a double digit favorite over is Oregon...and we all know Bama would have whipped them too.

No we don't. Assuming only makes an arse out of you. You never played a team that throws the ball as much as Oregon and West Virginia, that's why your defensive stats are padded...
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 10:02 am to
saying YES to beating Oregon does not make it automatically true.

Oregon is a handful. They can beat anyone.

remember, it was at a neutral location.

Posted by SL Tiger
Houston
Member since May 2007
2289 posts
Posted on 12/24/11 at 11:45 am to
quote:

I dont really consider him an LSU fan. Just a bitter sad little man whose sole enjoyment comes from trolling


Kinda like you? This post was stupid for a reason that you Gumps wouldn't comprehend. BAMA obvuiously wouldn't have beaten LSU at LSU. You couldn't do it at home.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter