Started By
Message
Posted on 12/24/11 at 3:58 am to FTBLFN
quote:
LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten
Just another dumbass Gump who is too stupid to understand that coulda/shoulda/woulda beaten is NOT the same as HAS BEATEN!!
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:46 am to Analyze That
5 turnovers vs mighty Kent. 
Posted on 12/24/11 at 8:36 am to Mayhawman
Yes the Gumps would have beaten LSU's opponents, just as LSU would have run thru Bama's.
But that doesn't matter.
At the end of the season did Bama beat LSU?
Bama couldn't even beat its own scheduled opponents.
So the point is moot.
But that doesn't matter.
At the end of the season did Bama beat LSU?
Bama couldn't even beat its own scheduled opponents.
So the point is moot.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 8:48 am to FTBLFN
Conjecture pure conjecture, or you might say Would LSU have beaten ULM when BAMA didn't???
Posted on 12/24/11 at 8:58 am to FTBLFN
I think Alabama would have beaten each of the LSU opponents by double digits just as LSU did. Perhaps Oregon's speed might have created some issues, but I think Alabama would have worn them down and won by double digits
Posted on 12/24/11 at 9:16 am to FTBLFN
And I bet okie St goes 11-1 against bama's schedule too.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 9:21 am to SouGent
Well the bcs this year has allowed Bama to just claim it would have gone undefeated against any schedule (except the schedule Bama actualy played) without having to actually do it. That's the beauty of the eyeball test.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 9:44 am to FTBLFN
The only team on that schedule which Bama may not have been a double digit favorite over is Oregon...and we all know Bama would have whipped them too.
No we don't. Assuming only makes an arse out of you. You never played a team that throws the ball as much as Oregon and West Virginia, that's why your defensive stats are padded...
No we don't. Assuming only makes an arse out of you. You never played a team that throws the ball as much as Oregon and West Virginia, that's why your defensive stats are padded...
Posted on 12/24/11 at 10:02 am to FTBLFN
saying YES to beating Oregon does not make it automatically true.
Oregon is a handful. They can beat anyone.
remember, it was at a neutral location.
Oregon is a handful. They can beat anyone.
remember, it was at a neutral location.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 11:45 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
I dont really consider him an LSU fan. Just a bitter sad little man whose sole enjoyment comes from trolling
Kinda like you? This post was stupid for a reason that you Gumps wouldn't comprehend. BAMA obvuiously wouldn't have beaten LSU at LSU. You couldn't do it at home.
Popular
Back to top

1




