Started By
Message
re: Who has been the most dominant CFB Program since 2000
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:10 pm to LarrySellers
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:10 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
Some people discount USC b/c of Reggie Bush
Irrelavant. Bush didn't play for the decade. Its a clear thing of looking at the numbers and not picking out what you want to read. Yeah USC was good, they had a couple losing seasons during that span, they lost wins and titles per NCAA.
dom·i·nant
1.ruling,governing,or controlling;having or exerting authority or influence
2.occupying or being in a commanding or elevated position.
Dominant does not = losing seasons. Sorry buddy.
1
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:11 pm to LarrySellers
You used undefeated seasons as a barometer for success over a ten year period or so. If auburn was more dominate using the number of wins, why do numerous other teams have way more wins in that time frame? You literally picked the one statistic that auburn looks good in. There are shitloads of others in which they are way behind. I guess if it makes you feel better buddy lol.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:11 pm to beatbammer
quote:
I'm gonna pat myself on the back here and admit that my list is the best list put together on this thread.
i agree
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:11 pm to HokieHigh540
quote:
Found this on the web Top 25 last decade.
nice find. Interestng take, that article ranks the last decade as follows
1.USC
2.Oklahoma
3.Texas
4.Ohio State
5.Florida
6.LSU
7.Georgia
8.Boise State
9.Miami
10.Virginia Tech
11.Oregon
12.Florida State
13.TCU
14.Auburn
15.West Virginia
16.Boston College
17.Utah
18.Alabama
19.Michigan
20.Wisconsin
21.Nebraska (tie with Iowa)
22.Iowa (tie with Nebraska)
23.Texas Tech
24.Oregon State
25.Tennessee
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:13 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
are you serious?
Its an opinion, there is no right or wrong answer... it all depends on what "most dominant" means to you
well atleast stick to your own damn topic
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:15 pm to LarrySellers
LSU
UF
UF
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:16 pm to Brageous
quote:
You used undefeated seasons as a barometer for success over a ten year period or so. If auburn was more dominate using the number of wins, why do numerous other teams have way more wins in that time frame? You literally picked the one statistic that auburn looks good in. There are shitloads of others in which they are way behind. I guess if it makes you feel better buddy lol.
Thats just one stat to look at. I'm no Auburn fan, but I find that to be an impressive accomplishment. Although I never once said that makes them the most dominant, I just think they should be in the discussion b/c that is something none of the other teams on the list were able to do. And besides 1 bad season, there were pretty solid every other year
there are lots of barometers to look at for this question, thats just one of them
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:17 pm to LarrySellers
quote:.
25.Tennessee
Woohoo we made it!!
quote:
19.Michigan
bullshite
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:19 pm to Android
quote:
Dominant does not = losing seasons. Sorry buddy.
so by your definition... If a team won 9 out of 10 National Titles in a decade, but the one year they didnt win a title they went 5-7... that would exclude them from the discussion?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:19 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
And besides 1 bad season, there were pretty solid every other year
they had 7 years where they lost 4 or more games....and you want to knock LSU for their '07 NC
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:20 pm to HokieHigh540
quote:
Found this on the web Top 25 last decade.
Except that doesn't include 2010, so it doesn't include all of last decade.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:21 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
Dominant does not = losing seasons. Sorry buddy.
so by your definition... If a team won 9 out of 10 National Titles in a decade, but the one year they didnt win a title they went 5-7... that would exclude them from the discussion?
Good thing you didnt start a topic going back to 1999 then cause LSU would be discluded.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:23 pm to beatbammer
Y'all done beat me down in this one ...I am outta here
Until after lunch
Until after lunch
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:23 pm to Choctaw
quote:
they had 7 years where they lost 4 or more games....and you want to knock LSU for their '07 NC
I only knock LSU for '07 b/c ya'll claim that as the top reason ya'll should be considered the most dominant
AU and LSU both have a bunch of 3-4 loss seasons over that period, but I never said Auburn should be considered because they went 12-2 one year. I said they should be considered b/c they ran the table twice
LSU has a 2 loss season and b/c they lucked out and won a title act as if we should bow down to their greatness
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:25 pm to beatbammer
quote:
Except that doesn't include 2010, so it doesn't include all of last decade.
Still a pretty interesting take
Its obvious they put stock in different factors than the people in this thread have
He lists how he factors wins, conference championships, bowl wins, BCS bowl wins, top 25 finishes, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes and MNC into a formula
and this is what he comes out with (again this is 2000-2009 so not exactly the same time period we were talking about but close enough)
1.USC
2.Oklahoma
3.Texas
4.Ohio State
5.Florida
6.LSU
7.Georgia
8.Boise State
9.Miami
10.Virginia Tech
11.Oregon
12.Florida State
13.TCU
14.Auburn
15.West Virginia
16.Boston College
17.Utah
18.Alabama
19.Michigan
20.Wisconsin
21.Nebraska (tie with Iowa)
22.Iowa (tie with Nebraska)
23.Texas Tech
24.Oregon State
25.Tennessee
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:26 pm to LarrySellers
I think LSU fans are claiming dominance because LSU has the most wins since 2000 according to stats posted early in the thread. 2000-present.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:27 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
nice find. Interestng take, that article ranks the last decade as follows
As I pointed out above, that list was done prior to the 2010 season.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:28 pm to LarrySellers
quote:
I only knock LSU for '07 b/c ya'll claim that as the top reason ya'll should be considered the most dominant
ummm...no we don't. its also because we have the most NCs (tied with UF) and a shitload of wins
quote:
I said they should be considered b/c they ran the table twice
yea...but we're talking about over 12 years. 7 of which they lost 4 or more games
quote:
LSU has a 2 loss season and b/c they lucked out and won a title act as if we should bow down to their greatness
the reason you started this thread is blatantly obvious....especially since you're trying to give auburn more credit than LSU
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:29 pm to Brageous
quote:
I think LSU fans are claiming dominance because LSU has the most wins since 2000 according to stats posted early in the thread. 2000-present.
Which is inaccurate. Three teams have more wins than LSU during that time frame.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:29 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Good thing you didnt start a topic going back to 1999 then cause LSU would be discluded.
Yeah thanks for this glorius, but obvious comment.
quote:
Who has been the most dominant CFB Program since 2000
2000.
Page 14 of 24
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News